limbo

Hello, many other classic aircraft in this simulator have the paper flight bag and I just find it a bit silly to be honest, like a trend that gets dug into for no reason or benefit to a user other than cool and never use it again (but of course this is different in this case) like flushable toilets and stuff which is a plain waste of development time and instead should be put into stuff that matters. I'm all for the atmosphere of a classic aircraft but a paper flight bag seems a bit odd, but this is more than likely only going to be me. If it was an extremely old laptop or just an EFB I think it would be reasonable, but if it's done it's done. I hope this sets a new bar for inibuilds aircraft and while nobody could be able to deduce every single system working in this aircraft simply cause it's glass. I hope it is study level and even though being a completely different aircraft doesn't suffer from modelling issues or flight model issues (especially the latter, that are present on all airbus aircraft) that are refused to fix with certain excuses.

@IniJamirAny chance this can get forwarded, as well as the other thread for the a340 that is the same topic, thanks

Didn't know it worked, clearly other devs are a bit slow.

Sorry for the weird flickering, no clue what's going on there.

Not sure how to upload videos bypassing the size limit, so it's compressed. All callouts are enabled, 90 and 80 callout do not work. Thanks Jamir for the swift response, I think you are valuable to inibuilds, they may not see that, 82 posts already in less than a week! 🙂 8mb.video-ycx-xsvgvnFW.mp4

BATC D-ATIS hasn't been implemented for any aircraft at the moment iirc.

@A330MRTT However, that is not the tonality of the voice of an a350 in contrast to every single cockpit video. (I'd presume OP there as I have said in that post got them from youtube as well) My assumptions are inibuilds (boris himself has done this in his work to. however corrected it) has taken samples from these youtube videos instead of getting additional references from the real aircraft, but however after telling Steve on discord which I am now banned from that they sound like you are wearing headphones and listening without ambient speaker kind of effect they were wrong. And then the sound team looked at the reference I attached and applied some noise reduction and put it in. It would be great if they could be recorded from the real aircraft, or atleast the level D simulator (sometimes those sound different to e.g. a320 simulators have a330 and 340 voice which is odd, but software I guess)

As the title says, not sure if the testers can repo

I agree, it took them months to fix the a350 tonality even after commenting on a post a while back and receiving no response, if i'm going to be completley honest the only way to get a response is on their discord, that is the only way. The forums have to be the absolute worst, no response or a fragmented response. And with that ^ since they use cockpit videos for reference for whatever when it comes to the flight model, I find it hilarious they got it wrong in the first place. And the staff would say "it's company options" or that is how it is supposed to sound when cockpit videos which inibuilds uses tells you everything you need to know, like what? And when the tonality was changed to the proper way for both aircraft, hundred above and minimum was not changed, which is for one silly. And the same with retard. My a340 90-80 callouts still don't work to... No clue with the ai use by the other guy in expressing frustration you don't need ai for that. One's actual words is far better, but inibuilds is known for quantity rather than quality, and this better damn change with the a380. Which means a better flight model (no levitating off the runway bull, and this flight model mod doesn't work because everything is controlled by WASM 😂. The biggest sore with ini flight models at the moment is how bad they feel on takeoff, the pitch is first off sensitive and the pitch rotation is wrong I can't even do a 10 degrees back pressure cause I will tailstrike, so great job inibuilds "our data is so amazing!!! yet you use cockpit videos and can't pick up on sidestick handling on takeoff. I expect better system simulation as well, you have the capabilities, aside from that hope this gets fixed

@IniSteveGreat if this could get added for both a350 and a340 separate post as well, I believe both are slightly different: A bit disappointing I did not get a response last time, but whatever

Couldn't be bothered to make a dual post this time but is there any reasoning why the ground speed is so laggy like input delay, is this similar behaviour to the real a350?

Lufthansa Airbus A350-900 Start Up, Flight Control Check and Flaps ASMR This is a real life flight controls check of the airbus a350, now of course there is no cockpit footage so no sidestick etc. As for in the sim the spoiler deployment and ailerons deflection seems far slower compared to video. Also in the near full deflection on the simulator it slows down considerably in the outer ranges and I was just wondering if this is just how the FBW has been coded or is possibly a simulation limitation or just a flight model problem potentially, which I doubt, or maybe something to do of course with how the simulator as with any game processes these inputs linearly.

Has it been fixed yet a few airlines have these configured, on holiday currently.

@IniSteve are you able to forward this to the systems team, as well as my separate however same topic for the a350: Thanks

Follow that guide to report the wasm crash so they can fix it.

Bumping, any news on this Ini team?

any news on this from the staff?

Looking at streams, the hundred above has not been changed, hope that gets changed before this update with other fixes and the VIP (which I personally don't care for) Also, any news on an a350 update soon? ^The same thing also has to be changed for the a350 although you guys are aware in other threads.

Actually going to add something with this now that I realise what you mean. The 5 callout oes seem to be 1-2 feet above the ground and this is the same in cockpit videos from what I have seen when I did take a look at this.

A340 releasing on ini manger on the 15th.

They changed it forgot what ground speed above however it was changed quite a while ago.. the other info was unnecessary as well..

Would be great to have the RA callouts livery specific, didn't that usto be a thing then removed? And for those that want to change it (including other options) can override it and add a restore livery config button in the OIS maybe equipment settings.

Appreciate the response Steve, hope these issues are however on the cards for following updates asap if able to for both the a350 and the a340 as I quite like the hand flying of the 340 but on takeoff it feels like a toy and that is the case for the 350 as well.

Honestly that isn't surprising with it being broken, and the community who don't even look at issues being reported in discord and here have the urgency to call this aircraft study level. This is nowhere near a ultimate airliner experience and yet i'm sure as the months go by no staff will respond at all even if I do that. --> @Eddie or @IniSteve it would be great if there was some clarity in these immersion breaking issues, no staff responses have been issued for these major issues yet anything minor any staff will answer. Maybe it could just be holidays that's fine but it's a bit disappointing none of these issues have been fixed, and a few have probably been logged in discord and left off the cards for a while.