limbo

Would be great to have the RA callouts livery specific, didn't that usto be a thing then removed? And for those that want to change it (including other options) can override it and add a restore livery config button in the OIS maybe equipment settings.

Appreciate the response Steve, hope these issues are however on the cards for following updates asap if able to for both the a350 and the a340 as I quite like the hand flying of the 340 but on takeoff it feels like a toy and that is the case for the 350 as well.

Honestly that isn't surprising with it being broken, and the community who don't even look at issues being reported in discord and here have the urgency to call this aircraft study level. This is nowhere near a ultimate airliner experience and yet i'm sure as the months go by no staff will respond at all even if I do that. --> @Eddie or @IniSteve it would be great if there was some clarity in these immersion breaking issues, no staff responses have been issued for these major issues yet anything minor any staff will answer. Maybe it could just be holidays that's fine but it's a bit disappointing none of these issues have been fixed, and a few have probably been logged in discord and left off the cards for a while.

As the title says, when entering the ETOPS entry point on stored waypoints on the FMGS the wasm crashes.

Nevermind disregard, I guess with how the a380 and a350 have newer FBW systems the input lag is no longer demonstrated on the indicator however the behaviour is correct for the a340. I have to say though the flight model does feel quite a lot better with the feel of the 'lag' although that is just opinion. Although the take-off pitch rotation desperately needs to be fixed as it is ruining immersion at higher weights for both the a350 and the a340 and to be frank I fail to see how that can be screwed up and the team never respond, yet respond to a few other things.

They are still, we better hope it's good, although I have 1% hope ini can excel with these two aircraft with no violent pitch up or flight model issues such as wrong pitch rotation. it is getting more and more infuriating the days they don't fix it for the a350 and the a340, since they are very pitch sensitive on takeoff, and the system depth better be fenix level for such a legendary aircraft, atleast we know the modelling will be excellent judging from the emirates bar we have seen

That to, and the only way to get them to fix stuff is discord, some things even here and on there say have been logged and untouched for months. Their discord moderation team is terrible, and some of those people who aren't staff staff and work for inibuids get the pre release aircraft even though they are terrible moderators *cough cough* I have one in mind, inibuilds needs to hire more staff not moderators 😂 I think with the overpriced aircraft they sell they can afford more staff...

I can't edit but the retard callout can cut off, this appears to be for the older airbuses I would assume with the ra callouts taking priority after idle, then it cuts off.

As we know and are told the a340 has delay on pilot inputs to the ailerons through the flight computer and so does the a330 and a350, as well as the A380 which I know isn't available yet from you guys. I have made comparison videos however can't submit here however on the A350 and A380 the sidestick position does not at all correspond with input lag, so why is it like this for the a340. I don't think that would be happening in the real aircraft either (unless it's just cause it's older) P.S. please fix takeoff pitch rotation, it is getting really annoying that you guys don't respond to anything that may be wrong with yall's aircraft flight controls wise, it's rude

In The image above shows the inibuilds a340 in the simulator with the N1 indicators outlines EGT box outlines being grey, as well as below FOB and Flaps and Slats Indicator. However in the image below the outlines appear far more white then what inibuilds has put into the aircraft. Considering inibuilds thinks alot of airbus things are the same I am not surprised, oh well. Also noticed on the PFD it is also white on the top if indications of A/THR I think that is all meant to be white in the CRT's

Exactly, really annoying and Echo 19 used the exact same sample for the a350 and the a340, I don't exactly think we would hear it during cruise or descent..

Still not fixed, I want to know if they are afraid to admit if something is wrong, disappointment..

That's what the title says although I would presume that wouldn't be able to easily implement at all.

Any clarity for this would be appreciated.

Just to add for prosperity down here is that the retard callout should not abruptly cut off before it ends if you idle the the thrust during it if it calls repeatedly, this is not the case for any airbus.

Just to add for prosperity down here is that the retard callout should not abruptly cut off before it ends if you idle the the thrust during it if it calls repeatedly, this is not the case for any airbus.

As detailed in my other a340 post this is prevalent in the a350 as well. The a350 is correct in terms of 20 retard, however on autoland it still calls out retard at 20 feet, this is incorrect as seen in this video, no clue if still applies https://youtu.be/c44dToFnGzs?si=ATDhhlT6CPBEugBV&t=961 Furthermore, the a350 also will overlap other callouts however this is also not the case, it must override and take priority over RA callouts, once the thrust is set to idle retard will no longer occur and the aircraft can callout the five callout as an example. Also, the retard callout will still occur one time if the thrust is set to idle before the callout as seen here you can see the A/T light extinguish before 20 feet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JjuksTvMRg&t=214s Hope this gets fixed soon for both the a350 and the a340, heck even the default airbus aircraft in msfs2024 as this is a VERY basic oversight that shouldn't have been overlooked and something basic that should have been on release and something that the pilots that test your aircraft should have spotted, but maybe they simply don't care...

This affects all inibuilds airbuses, however retard atleast in the a340 should not be instant as soon as 20FT however it is after 20 in the a350 which it is changed in the a340 for some reason, it should be right after the callout of 20FT. It should also still call even if the thrust is set to idle beforehand, furthermore it should also override any RA callouts, not overlap over them. This is also the case with all ini airbuses. I have not done an autoland at all but I assume it wouldn't do retard at 10FT either.

Not the same tone and sound completely different to the rest of the callouts. A youtube video that the sounds team can probably rip it from: Very loud and high quality just needs some noise isolation

All developers analyse feasibility for the next aircraft they make, Aerosoft and Toliss will be far out of inibuilds league and highly worth it. Aerosoft isn't handling anything systems wise. I disagree with trusting inibuilds, they still don't have a good release criteria for their aircraft, hope that changes.

Aerosoft and Toliss are handling the -600 no need for inibuilds...

Before I was banned from the Discord, I saw a community post about pitch rotation being completely wrong. Eddie said months ago that it was logged, yet nothing has changed months after saying it was logged (iirc) Claiming the flight model is “the best" or this aircraft is "ultimate" is not at all the case even multitude of updates later, performance and less WASM crashes sure, that is nice but the focus needs to be drawn back to the things that matter. Both the A350 and A340 suffer from completely wrong pitch rotation and a pitch-up jerk after raising the gear / immense pitch sensitivity last I was told this is from the transition to direct law to normal law but I doubt this would be the case at all. Despite the flight model being “verified by real-world pilots,” (which sorry to say most are actually affiliated with you guys and we know what happens when you hand out preview aircraft) the aircraft can levitate off the runway, float to the end, and climb at 100 knots even without stalling maybe that is terrible ground effect who knows, speaking from my experience. Even at MTOW, it will still rotate at around 2° of pitch according to the people in the discord For many of us complainers, this breaks immersion. While I accept whatever ini delivers in system depth now, the original promise of ultimate airliner experience hasn’t been upheld atleast in my opinion, and while I know you guys have to work around simulator constraints but compared to the likes of PMDG who have been trusted for decades and flying fenix then hopping into inibuilds airbuses it's a bit unsatisfying, it'd be great if a flight model overhaul could happen with maybe some digital flight data recorder stick aggregate to help with modelling flare physics or takeoff etc as I think having access to data like that could help improve a bit. Also, while cockpit videos may not be the best references it can be helpful a bit in simulating logic, you guys also haven't implemented proper retard logic, and it took you guys month to actually fix the RA callouts tonality, while all your staff without even looking at a video said but oh this is how it actually sounds, while all the airbuses you guys have ever made except the a300 and a310 had the exact same samples and voice for the callouts Stability and performance are decent, but the aircraft still sits in my hangar. I hope it gets fixed, but i'm not so hopeful Just note i'm not trying to come off as a pain here but it would be great to atleast have some clarity or if its taking alot of work if there is a possibility of flight model changes in the works, who knows?

@LineDXThe tone was wrong, it's only the quality that is the issue, it'll be fixed in due time.

You should submit a video, although I think they are aware of some weird timings with the ra callouts, the whole system logic there needs a overhaul.

They do sound like the correct tone but do sound a bit low quality, i'd assume they ripped it from the video I sent them The previous callouts sounded like you were wearing headphones and had a320 like voice, that was slam dunked into the a340 and also fixed.