limbo

Pretty sure they use Javascript, it's also why the OANS when the airport map pops up on touchdown is why there are no stutters compared to the a350

You can see that isn't the case at all in the trailer.

Any chance that could be made a livery config instead like how it works in the a350 for some options rather than user selectable? Would aid in realism for sure

Hmmm... still under Microsoft control tho 😬

True. I prefer pmdg's system where livery painters can select the configuration, and you dont like it then you can change it. Not for it to be locked, maybe something that should be changed in V2. With a restore to original config would be nice.

It'll probably be user selectable although unless someone from ini responds, you'll have to wait and see. Some option such as in the synaptic a220 aren't done with config.ini's which I actually find a bit annoying. Should be similar to their a350.

You retract the speedbrakes by disarming (push down) the speedbrake lever and that is it. No moving it all the way back and up. In all other airbuses this behaviour is the same, excluding the A300 and the a310 probs, by move down not sure if you mean like boeing but you got that wrong.

Another thing as I have mentioned many times (check my post history) is if the RA callouts/GPWS can be made more accurate Currently it seems to be "insert aircraft name here gpws callouts" off of Youtube in terms of the RA callouts, which those videos are mostly inaccurate Yes, the a350's ra callouts do come through the pilot's headset, however the tonality is different in cockpit videos when hooked up to the Audio panel, you can hear that in videos shared by Qatar Airways as they do that all the time. If it was possible, when using headphone simulation it should come through the headphones and when that is off it should use the loudspeakers, I doubt it's possible but if the tonality could be sorted that would be nice.

Will we at all get a welcome to video for the a350 V2 or even just a trailer? A350 V2 seems to be very packed with alot of goodies

Why does a feature which doesn't exist on the real world aircraft need to be in the simulator version. There was a lengthy discussion on the FBW discord about it, with one of your mods who 'jumpseated on an a380' saying that they would ban anyone who disagrees, and sort of implying it exists from the screenshots I saw. Some of the ini discord mods are just silly, glad i'm not in it anymore Atleast it's able to be disabled but a waste of resources imo, curious to hear anyone else's thoughts

It'd be great if speed brake rattling that is extremely audible (this is in the a340 as well) is removed. I find it extremely annoying and no other aircraft has it, nor do I think it is realistic.

As with most companies it's closed internal testing and is not open to application as far as we know. Just be weary, you can come off as only wanting to for early access.

While livery creators such as Hues can do their magic of course it won't be instant like the stock liveries so it would be nice if we could get a livery list. Hope q link is included, harsh uhh didn't know what that meant at first but neither him or Shaye have a clue of the livery list.

Your token can be grabbed for discord so you don't know its compromised then perform all the spam bot actions. So no, there's no 'it wasn't compromised' contact support again if you want to get to the bottom of it. After all most of the staff here do not at all touch discord related stuff.

Your discord account potentially got compromised and you got banned, if you've seen those messages where it's a scam. As much as I would also like my discord account unbanned from ini it was a very reasonable ban and promotes a practice I don't do anymore, however they have a zero tolerance policy for most things afaik.

I second this, I dont like the cabin tint. Not sure if it's connected to the model or whatever but it maybe is. Maybe someone could make a freeware mod for the time being

No. There's no news on pricing. Read synaptic's FAQ on the website. This is all public information that's easily able to be searched up before making a post anywhere.

Copy that, hope it's on the a380! :)

Hi @IniJamir any updates on this? Would really like this system logic on the 340 and 350 please I guess it's probably a lower priority item, however I think it's a very basic thing. If it is known and will be implemented soon hope it's put on the a380 before release to. The current logic is just unrealistic and weird currently

Agreed, personally I find it ridiculous about this operations pack that while optional is a waste of resources, people bought a passenger aircraft for a tristar, why do we all of a sudden need "air-to-air refuelling, a strategic freighter, and a medical and humanitarian evacuation" I do have the pmdg 777F so at best I would use the freighter but neither of the other 2 in practice, cool, but I would personally not use (especially the humanitarian one), of course there are people out there that will but at the same time ini while they do aircraft that their dev team like, I understand but instead of doing what the community wishes and to be frank the better variants of the pax l1011 we get this stuff, it's just to say the least disappointing. And that probably includes not even a UNS-1 that was more commonly found later in the aircraft's cycle.

I made a forum post on this last year and it was already fixed. It is correct to the a340's synthetic voice style. 1. Why are we using AI... 2. It is already fixed, it isn't like the RA callouts that were originally in the aircraft that were ripped from the a350/ airbus gpws callouts off of youtube

Yeah the sounds aren't the best, but good enough.

Second this. I don't care about the printer and don't pay much attention to it. Noise cancelling also doesn't really cancel about much, alot of things are still audible just slightly muffled, I don't know if the approach to it was similar as the a350 but things are still audible.

Yeah I've noticed this to. Yesterday I loaded up an autosave from Johannesburg to Perth and the LNAV was always 0.1R with minimal wind that would cause that. And it was wonky with some turns as well, The plane also oscillated with 4x time acceleration left right, down up so on so forth. However it was working perfectly fine before I went to bed and loaded the autosave the following day. I don't know if the performance degrades after loading an autosave but it was a factor.

1. Yes 2. There is no information on this nor any comment about the variant from inibuilds. I doubt they could obtain data on the airplane at this point since it hasn't actually been flown with Qantas at all, and given just like the 900ULR it will have a specific cabin config and data that needs to be done correctly, alot of factors to it.