limbo

While livery creators such as Hues can do their magic of course it won't be instant like the stock liveries so it would be nice if we could get a livery list. Hope q link is included, harsh uhh didn't know what that meant at first but neither him or Shaye have a clue of the livery list.

Your token can be grabbed for discord so you don't know its compromised then perform all the spam bot actions. So no, there's no 'it wasn't compromised' contact support again if you want to get to the bottom of it. After all most of the staff here do not at all touch discord related stuff.

Your discord account potentially got compromised and you got banned, if you've seen those messages where it's a scam. As much as I would also like my discord account unbanned from ini it was a very reasonable ban and promotes a practice I don't do anymore, however they have a zero tolerance policy for most things afaik.

I second this, I dont like the cabin tint. Not sure if it's connected to the model or whatever but it maybe is. Maybe someone could make a freeware mod for the time being

No. There's no news on pricing. Read synaptic's FAQ on the website. This is all public information that's easily able to be searched up before making a post anywhere.

Copy that, hope it's on the a380! :)

Hi @IniJamir any updates on this? Would really like this system logic on the 340 and 350 please I guess it's probably a lower priority item, however I think it's a very basic thing. If it is known and will be implemented soon hope it's put on the a380 before release to. The current logic is just unrealistic and weird currently

Agreed, personally I find it ridiculous about this operations pack that while optional is a waste of resources, people bought a passenger aircraft for a tristar, why do we all of a sudden need "air-to-air refuelling, a strategic freighter, and a medical and humanitarian evacuation" I do have the pmdg 777F so at best I would use the freighter but neither of the other 2 in practice, cool, but I would personally not use (especially the humanitarian one), of course there are people out there that will but at the same time ini while they do aircraft that their dev team like, I understand but instead of doing what the community wishes and to be frank the better variants of the pax l1011 we get this stuff, it's just to say the least disappointing. And that probably includes not even a UNS-1 that was more commonly found later in the aircraft's cycle.

I made a forum post on this last year and it was already fixed. It is correct to the a340's synthetic voice style. 1. Why are we using AI... 2. It is already fixed, it isn't like the RA callouts that were originally in the aircraft that were ripped from the a350/ airbus gpws callouts off of youtube

Yeah the sounds aren't the best, but good enough.

Second this. I don't care about the printer and don't pay much attention to it. Noise cancelling also doesn't really cancel about much, alot of things are still audible just slightly muffled, I don't know if the approach to it was similar as the a350 but things are still audible.

Yeah I've noticed this to. Yesterday I loaded up an autosave from Johannesburg to Perth and the LNAV was always 0.1R with minimal wind that would cause that. And it was wonky with some turns as well, The plane also oscillated with 4x time acceleration left right, down up so on so forth. However it was working perfectly fine before I went to bed and loaded the autosave the following day. I don't know if the performance degrades after loading an autosave but it was a factor.

1. Yes 2. There is no information on this nor any comment about the variant from inibuilds. I doubt they could obtain data on the airplane at this point since it hasn't actually been flown with Qantas at all, and given just like the 900ULR it will have a specific cabin config and data that needs to be done correctly, alot of factors to it.

Just asking if this will ever happen as Domestic is a huge part of Brisbane for obvious reasons, Australia's domestic is truly massive, although of course we can't compare it to the busiest Sydney to Melbourne route.

Imo you are just sounding a bit like AI at the moment (nor do we need the different fonts) to try and drive inibuilds to make this. However as I already said in my opinion they wouldn't go for it for the reasons I have already said. Aerosoft's frankfurt is already good. As well as for terminal 3, they will probably make it up to spec as the rest of their rendition of the airport when they are able to. The standard sim update should be more than enough for the time being

MORA.

Given you mention just console there wouldn't be much point to just develop it soley for console users. I'm sure most of ini's scenery market is on PC, and PC users already have the solid Aerosoft Frankfurt.

These are not functional, given the expectation/norm is using the mouse.

If the a380 turns out to be a huge success in what most consider the short comings of the current ini lineup (in some areas) such as flight dynamics (please no helicopter takeoff and liftoff at 5 degrees) and systems. Will the a350 V2 only add new features and benefits from the a380 like say the foley system in this a380, sounds, new OIS/EFB or could it potentially entail a rebuild of the a350, such as cockpit geometry and systems as well. Not asking for a full rebuild but there has been a couple of things inibuilds firmly believes they are correct which (such as data from flight model, despite using rw cockpit videos where for example we can see the a350 won't usually lift off at 5 degrees and be very quick with it to) Also, cockpit geometry, the windows are to large and this has been reported many times and it's very easy to see the difference in photos, the centre glareshield panel is thicker and shorter. I understand that it will affect livery painters although they take pride in their work and would be able to push a fix out to their liveries quite quickly

Also would like to say in the cockpit interaction video the avionics fans sound alot like what's stock in the a320 neo for the sim, WIP and all. Will definitely miss the features of FBW, some of their structural stuff is very fluid like engine shake, however at the cost of performance.

Yeah, ini has gone for a headphones approach which I didn't realise now (so understandable that my topic a while back was locked, I complain a tad bit much about this) but they've used youtube gpws callouts (insert aircraft here) as reference which isn't entirely accurate, all the vids I've seen have the incorrect tonality Here's a video where it does appear the audio is hooked up to the audio panel in the aircraft which means ATC audio and RA callouts: Etihad A350-1000 landing at super busy New York JFK Airport Airbus A350 - Full Approach and Landing in Boston (ENG subtitles) ^That is a bit more clearer audio, I hear a difference They did correct the voice with the a340 and the quality was superb, although the last time I requested it unfortunately it turned into youtube low quality audio.. if there's anyway to implement it like the a340 would be great.

I have already given you sources and that was quite a long time ago which you said you would 'note it for the team' I saw something mentioned in the changelogs of previous updates but it was not implemented correctly at all. The a340 has received no changes. And attached to that post was appropriate documentation of what is supposed to happen from an A350 and a340 FCOM, I question how nobody noticed it back when the aircraft was released. You guys use youtube videos as reference to.. not sure how this could be missed back when these aircraft were being developed (FWS/FWC on both the a350 and a340 do not use appropriate retard logic on touchdown) A340: https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/35186-retard-callout-logic-for-the-a340 A350: https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/35187-retard-logic-for-the-a350

And basic retard logic which tbh the rw pilots (which they are a joke atp) should never have missed hasn't hasn't added either despite it also being acknowledged. So much silly basic stuff missing with this aircraft. If the competitor does show up to be better on the basics, i'm saying goodbye to the ini and I hope others do so as well.

I loaded an autosave and now have about 40 fps before frame gen, flying over the black sea and whenever I try to use 4x time accel the aircraft will rock and the autopilot is immensely sluggish and sometimes as a result of this time accel behaviour due to the FPS the autopilot will disconnect However everytime I try to reengage the aircraft will do a crazy pitch up jerk and then well, disconnecting the autopilot which is extremely annoying I have to nearly pitch down to the max before I engage it just to fight the tendency it has, that should not be occurring at all 2026-04-08 10-55-50.mp4

In the mailbox, so probably atc com, and then you find all the messages, you can print those.