Jump to content

richboy2307

Moderator
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by richboy2307

  1. Hi. Apologies for the inconvenience! The team is investigating the issue currently. In the meanwhile please make the purchases through our web store instead (https://inibuilds.com/) and then use the manager to download those files. Thanks!
  2. Wrong weights imported on EFB by autofill/sync. Reported, thanks!
  3. Hi thanks for your report. Please try again now and let us know in case it is not working. Simbrief had temporary server issues on their end. Thanks!
  4. richboy2307

    Sound Mixing

    Hi Daniel, Thanks for your feedback! We do have some sound fixes in the pipeline currently to help improve that aspect of the product. Please do let us know what you think whenever that update is out 🙂
  5. Thanks, reported. In case you come across same situation again, please also attach here a screenshot, **during the wrong turn** of the following: PFD/ND MCDU FPLN page It will help to narrow down any specific issues. Thanks!
  6. richboy2307

    A300-600F

    So using the [600RF GE Freighter] profile provided above, I was able to come up with the following simbrief OFP (attached) PANC/07L N0445F320 DCT NODLE R220 NOLTI/N0454F330 R220 NATES/N0441F340 R220 NOGAL/N0452F350 R220 NODAN/N0451F360 R220 NANAC Y810 OLDIV Y809 SUPOK SUPOKT RJAA/34L CI 15, 3334nm air distance, 31kt headwind along the way (250/36 avg wind) I am able to get perf calculations for 15/15 config, for the shortest runway (7L) even for the following conditions (see screenshot 2): max TOW (170.5T kg) max fuel (54.5T kg) no wind (irl metar PANC 260653Z 00000KT 10SM -RA FEW050 OVC065 03/M01 A2953 RMK AO2 RAB47 SLP003 P0000 T00331006) For above conditions, config 15/0 does not work, and it warns me rightfully (see screenshot 3) So you may need to try various runway & configs (different flaps, aircon OFF, anti-ice off, or force toga ON) to eventually get a valid result. Anyways, try to use the linked profiles. Should work 🙂 PANCRJAA_PDF_1711438172.pdf
  7. richboy2307

    A300-600F

    Hi, These are the recommended profiles. I shall test out with the [600RF GE Freighter] profile and report back. Thanks!
  8. Ah ok thanks for the details. Noted, will report for further investigation! 🙏
  9. Hi, Both A300/310 modelled in the sim currently can only do basic LNAV/VNAV coupled RNAV approaches. It is also not capable of flying any RF legs. As such they're not LPV capable. That being said, IRL UPS A306 with the Honeywell EPIC avionics suite are capable of LPV approaches. So that may be possible in future builds 😉 Thanks!
  10. Hi, Can I confirm when you resumed the flight (presumable by loading a saved .flt file?) did the simulator time change to match the current time? Or was it still showing the time at which you saved the flight before exiting? Thanks!
  11. Hi, I just tested via [TOGGLE LANDING GEAR] and also [GEAR UP] / [GEAR DOWN] commands assigned to my Xbox Controller and also BravoTQ and it was working as intended. Can you please confirm you did the testing whilst in the air? By default the controls do not work when you're on the ground, as a safety mechanism to prevent gear retraction on the ground. Thanks!
  12. Hi, Yes I was able to reproduce this. I will report it to the team to see if anything can be done about it. Thanks!
  13. Have you tried to calibrate the throttles via the EFB [Options > Throttle Settings]? First click [Reset Calibration], then [Begin Calibration] and follow the steps by confirming each position. Thanks!
  14. Hey guys, Please post in English only on this forum! 🙏 But yes, use your ✅ Simbrief username (alpha-numeric) instead of the ❌ Pilot ID (numbers only). Thank you for your post. We depend on feedback/reports like yours to help improve the product wherever possible. 🙏 Per our team: "We have accurately simulated this. The heat is inside the brake assembly and has to radiate out. This was all taken from real timings / data on the 320. Carbon brakes on the 320 are expected to only start to show a large temp rise about 5/6 mins after landing and you will expect them to reach peak temps when you are on stand with engines off even." We've noted the other reported issues and will look into these. Thanks!
  15. Sorry not planned at the moment. But we do have our very own excellent A300F already with new PW engines and features coming! 😉
  16. The Camera API of MSFS is not exposed to 3rd party tools, as such no good ones exist. You can download some premade views off of flightsim.to if you want. Alternatively try to assign keys (or better yet axis if you have a controller connected) to camera translation settings. It works the best for now and you get used to it after a bit 🙂 Sorry, not planned currently.
  17. Hi, No, there isn't a [LDG PERF] calculator on the A310 for MSFS currently. This might indeed be a carry-over from the x-plane version. I will flag it for the team, thanks!
  18. Hi, thanks, yes the team is aware of the "update available" issue. A possible fix has been pushed. Please check now and let us know in case you are still getting this error. Thanks! As for GSX profiles, you can access the "full" profile via the [Home] > [GSX Profiles] section on the side bar. You should see both versions there.
  19. Hi Jack! Glad you are enjoying the plane! No maintenance should not be required after every flight, especially if you have set it to disabled. Please verify that it says on the top right of the Maintenance Mode section on Settings page 2/2 that the current maintenance mode is set to DISABLED? What indications/factors are you looking at to decide that you need to "fix" the APU or other items? Some more information will go a long way. Thanks! 🙂
  20. I just tried again, still running into the same issue. - Loaded up at EGNM - Using Navigraph Navdata (Latest Cycle) -Route: EGNM LAMIX L603 ROGAG DCT MAM DCT WTZ DCT KOK EBBR Here's the video:
  21. I am using Navigraph Navdata (latest cycle) but from my understanding the ini a310 just falls back on default sim navDB anyways? I'll try again to see if I can replicate the above and report back.
  22. Hi, Great plane and thank you! Only done a flight so far but issues I came across below: Route: EGNM LAMIX L603 ROGAG DCT MAM DCT WTZ DCT KOK EBBR 1) Unable to select between conflicting waypoints Entered the flightplan manually via F-PLN page. No matter by typing in MAM directly on the page, or via the LAT REV page (on waypoint ROGAG) it automatically selects MAM (VOR/DME) in Mexico, instead of the MAM (TACAN/DME) in UK. It does not give any option to select between these 2 conflicts either. Not sure if its due to filtering out ONLY DME stations, or some other issue not giving option to select between 2 waypoints with same name. Checked MSFS Nav DB via LittleNavMap: 2) Unable to enter specific waypoint Unable to select WTZ via the LAT REV page (on waypoint ROGAG), NEW WPT section. Typing WTZ into that section clears the scratchpad, but the MCDU remains frozen on the LAT REV page, as if no valid input was received. Was able to enter WTZ via F-PLN page directly though. Tried deleting and re-entering waypoint and was able to recreate this. For reference, this page: Checked MSFS Nav DB via LittleNavMap: Other observations/suggestions: A) Taxi Lights are Too Dark - In my opinion the Taxi Lights are too dark for use at night, needing to be increase to TO position to be of any use. Either its fall-off or brightness needs to be tweaked for a better balance. Found it to be particularly an issue where there's no taxiway centreline night lighting on the scenery. B) Nav Lights (Trailing Edge White Lights) Too Bright - The trailing edge white lights on wingtips seem way too bright, creating a huge splash zone on the ground behind. Its almost as if there are 2 landing lights going out the rear of the wingtip (see attached image for reference). Thanks again for looking into it. Overall very pleased with this aircraft and glad to fly it!
×
×
  • Create New...