limbo

I mean imo GSX passengers being visible does not matter much, nor it is a gamebreaker. Most jetways in real life you can't visibly see passengers anyway. Before OMDB and EGLL, when KORD debuted with the feature not every gate had multi jetways not sure if it is the case. I believe there was a guide on this forums somewhere to make GSX work with the multi jetways as it is quite iffy. Might have to search for that one, if you do find it let me know as well. It is of course also a possibility you can always uninstall the multi jetways controller, that is worth a shot as well.

PS5 requires extra work as Microsoft was made very clear any performance related stuff is on them and not Sony, so they are treading carefully. And I presume iniBuilds wants stuff to run well on the Ps5 as well.

Additional reference for RA callouts if needed, although quality wouldn't be the best if ripped straight from youtube @iniKyle https://youtu.be/3oAxCEvgSuw?si=4mf_KwLUga0OTMj4&t=4749 (hooked up to ACP panel) 2500 tonality is different, well tbh all of it. Loudspeakers: https://youtu.be/qcXQKQukxkI?si=jdhg8ngHtUmCuLEB&t=67 Would be great if we get an option to choose between the two, personally not a fan of a headset one, when I have noise cancelling turned off which is like 99% of the time

Agreed, its been one of the basic things I've been wanting to be proper logic

This question probably can't be answered at the moment although I was wondering if: Flight dynamics on takeoff will be revisted, (roll and pitch was extremely vague), as in the current a350 the rotation isn't all that dynamic, at light weight or MTOW the plane seems to stick to the runway during takeoff if that makes sense it also lifts off at 5 degrees and the nosewheel comes up to quick, ever since I've seen the plane lift off in chaseplane spotting view it looks so eerily wrong. Also the current a350 seems to stuck to the rails currently as well I don't really see it reacting to winds all that much or being 'fluid' I've seen PAX videos of the 350 on turbulent take-offs where the pilot has to apply so much input that the ailerons come up quite a bit. Hopefully maybe ground roll sounds and other feedback that can be changed (engines would be to complex) is able to be implemented at all either. Excited to see a trailer/welcome to if there is going to be another one for it, as the current 350 I just don't fly often, unfortunately in its current state of handling I don't enjoy it as much as I would.

Hi Kyle, Any updates on these items? I haven't bought the aircraft yet but hoping to in a few weeks

Something is better than nothing. Even though the weather radar is entirely useless then why do alot of products have it. A simple gimmick, there's alot of arguments you could make for implementing even satellite imagery, and just let people know it won't be 1 to 1.

The title I dont fly on Vatsim that's why.

I feel like YBBN is one of the more neglected sceneries in the portfolio, a bit disappointed it still hasn't received a Domestic Terminal, but of course sending resources down under is expensive for a scenery that probably didn't receive much sales, will it come in the future?

Just to let the inibuilds team know, one of the screenshots on the inibuilds a380 store page one of the screenshots is using DLSS 5, that is not vanilla and is misleading, to be fair I think anybody with half a brain knows it DLSS 5, and nobody would report to a consumer watch dog over this but to be honest some people would complain over this and be like my sim doesn't look like that did you use AI sort of thing Will there be any other giveaways for the a380 as well? I don't fly on Vatsim.

There has been no comments from Microsoft about what this alleged a330 update will contain and I'm curious to find out, and if so is there a rough estimate or in a sim update when this will come? Biggest improvement I would like to see is the flight model.

How is a350 V2 update progressing, other than the stuff listed in the recent dev update has any more stuff been added or will it just be those things?

That will obviously be possible.

Pretty sure they use Javascript, it's also why the OANS when the airport map pops up on touchdown is why there are no stutters compared to the a350

You can see that isn't the case at all in the trailer.

Any chance that could be made a livery config instead like how it works in the a350 for some options rather than user selectable? Would aid in realism for sure

Hmmm... still under Microsoft control tho 😬

True. I prefer pmdg's system where livery painters can select the configuration, and you dont like it then you can change it. Not for it to be locked, maybe something that should be changed in V2. With a restore to original config would be nice.

It'll probably be user selectable although unless someone from ini responds, you'll have to wait and see. Some option such as in the synaptic a220 aren't done with config.ini's which I actually find a bit annoying. Should be similar to their a350.

You retract the speedbrakes by disarming (push down) the speedbrake lever and that is it. No moving it all the way back and up. In all other airbuses this behaviour is the same, excluding the A300 and the a310 probs, by move down not sure if you mean like boeing but you got that wrong.

Another thing as I have mentioned many times (check my post history) is if the RA callouts/GPWS can be made more accurate Currently it seems to be "insert aircraft name here gpws callouts" off of Youtube in terms of the RA callouts, which those videos are mostly inaccurate Yes, the a350's ra callouts do come through the pilot's headset, however the tonality is different in cockpit videos when hooked up to the Audio panel, you can hear that in videos shared by Qatar Airways as they do that all the time. If it was possible, when using headphone simulation it should come through the headphones and when that is off it should use the loudspeakers, I doubt it's possible but if the tonality could be sorted that would be nice.

Will we at all get a welcome to video for the a350 V2 or even just a trailer? A350 V2 seems to be very packed with alot of goodies

Why does a feature which doesn't exist on the real world aircraft need to be in the simulator version. There was a lengthy discussion on the FBW discord about it, with one of your mods who 'jumpseated on an a380' saying that they would ban anyone who disagrees, and sort of implying it exists from the screenshots I saw. Some of the ini discord mods are just silly, glad i'm not in it anymore Atleast it's able to be disabled but a waste of resources imo, curious to hear anyone else's thoughts

It'd be great if speed brake rattling that is extremely audible (this is in the a340 as well) is removed. I find it extremely annoying and no other aircraft has it, nor do I think it is realistic.

As with most companies it's closed internal testing and is not open to application as far as we know. Just be weary, you can come off as only wanting to for early access.