Genista Posted Saturday at 03:36 PM Posted Saturday at 03:36 PM (edited) Hello. With a fully configured PMS and all that; If I press TM mode but autopilot is OFF, it will command 000 EPR and retard the throttles. Is it by design/ on purpose ? Edited Saturday at 03:37 PM by Genista typo in title
mph163 Posted Saturday at 07:04 PM Posted Saturday at 07:04 PM Really annoying issue and being ignored by team!
Solution RyanAlmeida95 Posted Saturday at 10:18 PM Solution Posted Saturday at 10:18 PM From what I can find. For the climb, engage CMD with VNAV selected and then select TM to follow the PMS EPR. TM is also compatible in semiautimatic mode and can be used with CWS engaged and or when using IAS or VS modes instead of VNAV. TM at a bare minimum needs a FD and CWS/CMD on to operate VNAV or Semiautomatic performance operations to be guided by PMS. 1
richboy2307 Posted Monday at 10:26 AM Posted Monday at 10:26 AM While it is correct that TM mode requires FD+AP, we'll have another look at what it should do when conditions are not met (i.e. just disengage TM instead of commanding EPR 000/IDLE thrust). The other thing to note is that both PMS are independent, so need their data entered separately. PMS1 data is only used by AP1 channel. 1 Vrishabh Sehgal ( @Richboy2307 ) Community Team Member & Tester iniBuilds Ltd. | inibuilds.com
Genista Posted Tuesday at 12:22 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 12:22 PM (edited) On 4/25/2026 at 6:18 PM, RyanAlmeida95 said: From what I can find. For the climb, engage CMD with VNAV selected and then select TM to follow the PMS EPR. TM is also compatible in semiautimatic mode and can be used with CWS engaged and or when using IAS or VS modes instead of VNAV. TM at a bare minimum needs a FD and CWS/CMD on to operate VNAV or Semiautomatic performance operations to be guided by PMS. Thank you very much for sharing. However that document does not explicitly say that TM (as you claim) would not work unless CWS/CMD is engaged; instead it just gives you the normal procedure to get the full engagement of PMS VNAV functions. Which, obviously, needs CMD on since those functions need pitch slaving too. Not exactly the same thing! Since AoA mode is able to command your throttles without any AP mode engaged, I am really curious why, from a systems perspective, TM would need CWS or CMD. In every other aircraft I know, including old designs like our tristar (I have DC9 and Concorde in mind), they live separately. Pitch/Yaw(YD)/Roll autopilot actuators can be engaged or not (on those other aircraft) but it won't affect what the A/T is doing because is it a different set of wiring, power supply etc. Edited Tuesday at 01:00 PM by Genista 1
RyanAlmeida95 Posted Tuesday at 08:47 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:47 PM Well in this case for the Tristar, AOA, AT and TM are different functions in their own right. They are not the same as each other. TM is directly controlled by the PMS. For the PMS to be engaged you need to use CWS/CMD as per the above. Without the PMS engaged by using CWS/CMD then TM has no instruction. 1
Genista Posted Tuesday at 09:27 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 09:27 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, RyanAlmeida95 said: Well in this case for the Tristar, AOA, AT and TM are different functions in their own right. They are not the same as each other. TM is directly controlled by the PMS. For the PMS to be engaged you need to use CWS/CMD as per the above. Without the PMS engaged by using CWS/CMD then TM has no instruction. Much clearer thanks. But it still doesn't indicate that engagement CWS or CMD is a requirement for it to work ! VNAV/IAS/MACH all work in conjunction with FD, regardless if CWS or CMD is engaged. Or to rephrase. PMS can feed FD with VNAV pitch commands. Even without CWS or CMD engage. Why would TM needs it ? (not trying to be pedantic, I just have never seen that design before and that makes me curious) Edited Tuesday at 10:03 PM by Genista
fishermanivan Posted Tuesday at 10:50 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:50 PM 1 hour ago, Genista said: Much clearer thanks. But it still doesn't indicate that engagement CWS or CMD is a requirement for it to work ! VNAV/IAS/MACH all work in conjunction with FD, regardless if CWS or CMD is engaged. Or to rephrase. PMS can feed FD with VNAV pitch commands. Even without CWS or CMD engage. Why would TM needs it ? (not trying to be pedantic, I just have never seen that design before and that makes me curious) Yes it does need the AP. Says AP must be on in CMD and VNAV selected.
RyanAlmeida95 Posted Wednesday at 06:26 AM Posted Wednesday at 06:26 AM I'd say the logic would be that the PMS and INS can share information with the FD in general, in any case. CWS and CMD are both functions of the APFDS that control the aircraft in an automatic or semi automatic way. TM is used to provide management of thrust in these automatic and semi automatic conditions. You could use VNAV with the FD to fly manually, but to use TM you would need CWS as a bare minimum to have thrust management controlled by the PMS in a semi automatic condition. Or CMD to have a fully automatic condition.
Genista Posted Wednesday at 01:50 PM Author Posted Wednesday at 01:50 PM Was just hoping to find documentation that proves this, as it is quite a surprising design choice. Anyways. Thanks for the help ! Btw your document above states that after liftoff, PMS should switch to CLB page. I don't believe our tristar does that in the sim yet.
Nikita2024 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago On 4/27/2026 at 6:26 AM, richboy2307 said: While it is correct that TM mode requires FD+AP, we'll have another look at what it should do when conditions are not met (i.e. just disengage TM instead of commanding EPR 000/IDLE thrust). The other thing to note is that both PMS are independent, so need their data entered separately. PMS1 data is only used by AP1 channel. This happened to me on my first flight in 1.0.4, zero thrust, when hand flying a departure and mistakenly selecting TM before engaging AP. Having read this thread I was aware of my error and quickly corrected, but this absolutely must be fixed for the majority of users out there who may not have read this thread or post. What compounds this situation is not having a suitable hardware binding to toggle AP on/off, which works for EVERY other aircraft model, DLC or first party. Having to manipulate the mouse to engage AP during this most busy bit of flight sets the user up for a number of errors. Worse, it is an unnecessary and unwanted departure from what is basic and standard in MSFS/2024. Please enable toggle AP on/off by hardware, thank you. Nikita, Flight Crew (MSFS/2024)
richboy2307 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 11 hours ago, Nikita2024 said: What compounds this situation is not having a suitable hardware binding to toggle AP on/off, which works for EVERY other aircraft model, DLC or first party. Having to manipulate the mouse to engage AP during this most busy bit of flight sets the user up for a number of errors. Worse, it is an unnecessary and unwanted departure from what is basic and standard in MSFS/2024. Please enable toggle AP on/off by hardware, thank you. The AP1 can be toggled between CMD and OFF using the "TOGGLE AUTOPILOT MASTER" keybind. The Autopilot disconnect (on yoke) can be used via the "AUTOPILOT OFF" keybind. The only one not mapped is AUTOPILOT ON as forcing it on via key event was causing other logic issues with CWS in certain cases. As for the 000 EPR issue, as mentioned above team is investigating the correct behaviour and working on it for a future update. Thanks! Vrishabh Sehgal ( @Richboy2307 ) Community Team Member & Tester iniBuilds Ltd. | inibuilds.com
Genista Posted 57 minutes ago Author Posted 57 minutes ago 1 hour ago, richboy2307 said: The AP1 can be toggled between CMD and OFF using the "TOGGLE AUTOPILOT MASTER" keybind. The Autopilot disconnect (on yoke) can be used via the "AUTOPILOT OFF" keybind. The only one not mapped is AUTOPILOT ON as forcing it on via key event was causing other logic issues with CWS in certain cases. As for the 000 EPR issue, as mentioned above team is investigating the correct behaviour and working on it for a future update. Thanks! Appreciate the support guys. Cheers and thanks for bringing this aircraft to the sim.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now