spottersim

Hi, I have noticed that the ini A340 usually lands with a THS setting of around 4 to 5 units UP. IRL footage suggests that it requires more nose up trim during landing (note trim wheel green band) This can be further verified by comparing the position of the THS LE and elevator to irl images (note LE in relation to GND SET marking) D-AIGZ | Airbus A340-313X | Lufthansa | Oliver Richter | JetPhotos D-AIGZ | Airbus A340-313X | Lufthansa | flyetski | JetPhotos IniBuilds A340: Uploading Attachment... Will this flight model issue be fixed in an upcoming update?

Hi, I have noticed that the ini A340-300 seems to lift off the ground and climb away a lot better than its real world counterpart. This especially applies to the first and second takeoff segment. Here's some irl footage showing the rotation and initial climb rate. Note that it rarely exceeds 1500fpm and stabilizes shy of 1000fpm.: IRL ADS-B data: Planespotters.net Flight Tracker Inibuilds A340: Is the team aware of these issues and looking to refine the lift coefficient or other variables related to the lift off and initial climb behavior?

Hi, I've noticed that switching the NORTH REF switch does affect the value of the entered radials on the FIX INFO page. Switching back to magnetic also does not restore the original value. I'm not sure if the values should change at all. MAG TRU Back to MAG Is this known/will this be fixed?

I did a test at different speeds and CIs and found the following: M.780 ~ 1300 kg/hr (per engine) CI 10 ~ 1320kg/hr CI 160 ~ 1340 kg/hr M.840 ~ 1390 kg/hr I did my best to let the engines stabilize before noting the values. I think that the fuel flow spread across the speed range is way too small and should be looked at. This also affects fuel predictions, as in this case it seems that the gained time outweighs the higher FF when increasing the speed. Here, a bigger increase in FF with speed (engine output) would be required to restore normal FF ~ speed ~ flight time relationships. Would it be possible to look into this issue?

I’ve also noticed that EFOB at destination increases as the CI is increased. Flight time does reduce, but so does the fuel usage, which is not the way it should be.