Farlis

That's GSX. Check your profile for Heathrow.

Now I know what happened to my PMDG777 in VR. I had the same issue in VR and had no clue what was going on. Now I see this thread and all makes sense.

It's not realistic to fly long haul over 8 hours alone without a shift change. So flying sped up is the best option.

Cannot confirm. Issue is gone all works as it should now.

My experience is that it OVERestimates the fuel burn. I usually take up about 300kg more than the OFP states, which is good practice, but in the A350 that is not necessary because I end up with more than 1000kg than estimated at my destination. At least it used to be this way, maybe the updated profiles calculate the fuel burn mor precicesly.

I have the same issue. What is especially odd that after just updating to the newest version and clearing the WASM folder it worked on my first flight. But the 2nd time I fired up simulator and aircraft it is broken again and won't print F-Plan INIT and T.O. Data when it should.

Apart from the obvious typo I can confirm this behavior. The newest patch broke the Terrain Display on the FO side. Don't you love it when something that fixes one thing breaks another at the same time?

Because you watched videos on YouTube of the real thing, and not because you actually fly the real thing you are 100% confident? Bold. I would never be more than 86% confident about some aircraft behavior I have never flown in real life myself numerous times. 😉

A logged bug is not a fixed bug.

I mean +21 ISA... QED.

Just a heads up: You do know that you can use the windows key + the print key to make screenshots inside the sim and don't have to make a photo of your monitor?

That's the problem then. Sometimes Live weather is bugged and reports wrong temperatures. Happens in the Gander area around Greenland and northern Canada at times. When you are at FL370 trying to do a step climb but outside air temperature is at +2°C things will not go as they should.

If you like it need and clean then the covers belong there. Every airline that has the HUDS installed uses the covers as per manufacturers recommendation and actually prerequisite to not void the guarantee. These things are expensive and you don't want any scratches on them. Thefore they are always stowed away with the covers on them when not used.

As far as I know brake temperature accumulation is not yet simulated. This is also reflected in BTV where changing the distance of breaking does nothing to change the turnaround times.

So people really expect them to spend development time into getting procedures for an airport to work that has been discontinued 25 years ago? You learn something new every day...

There is nothing wrong with the climb rate. 1- It's an Airbus not a Boeing. Airbus aircraft are always more sluggish to climb 2. It uses Auto-Derate to reduce wear on the engines. If you want more climb power switch it off 3 If it still climbs too slow look at the SAT and ISA deviation. If you find yourselfs in an are where the ISA deviation above FL180 is higher than +15 degrees then you will have trouble producing with engine power and therefore the climb rate will be greatly reduced.

Is that a new option? Back in 2016 when they placed their orders they opted out of the HUD.

To my knowledge Lufthansa does not use the HUD. Adding to your list Etihad and Cathay do as well have them.

It's not only SayIntentions. On Hoppie the PDC is not sent. CPDLC does work, but PDC's don't come through.

Huh? Could you be more specific? Guys, this is not a place to vent, it's to report bugs. "NAV button is broken on takeoff" is not a bug report.

Yup. Just look at the cabin. They deliberately built it for less passengers to make it more comfortable to fly for over 18 hours straight.

So did you update through the Hub or through the OIN? It is my understanding that whenever an Aircraft comes with the option to do it inside the sim, this will yield better results.

Nontheless that is another tick on the list of things that competitors at this price range do offer. For this kind of money I fully expect this to be correcly simulated. That's not what I'm seeing. It takes a while but it does warm up the cabin.

You have to set the set the default graphic quality of MSFS2024 to at least "High": I assume your's is on "medium" or less.

I noticed that when you sit on the ground with packs off and all air conditioning switched off the temperature readings inside the aircraft seem wrong. Usually one can expect them to be similar or higher than outside temperature, considering that the fans are not running and the aircraft is sitting in direct sunlight. 13°C with outside Temperature of 23°? I don't think so.