mburkhard

So the ORBX city scenery is compatible with V2 OMDB? No duplicated buildings and such? The Product page didn't say...

I'm with ini on this one to be honest. If we can't have a simulator view as the camera view on the screen, then it's not worth doing. Because sim scenery will always have differences compared to whatever imagery is used on Aerosoft's camera view, and if it's just the centreline not matching by a metre or two, or you can't see a vehicle in your way and such, nah it would be kind of pointless. I'm afraid you'll have to take this one up with Asobo. Camera views has been requested forever, but Asobo doesn't see the need for it unfortunately.

Uh... I think I'll wait buying this 😵‍💫 Thanks for the warning guys!

Absolutely agree with the Dingli radar request, it needs to be there as it is used as a VFR reporting point when flying into and out of LMML.

FYI, I installed Liverpool on my 2nd PC which I use as a testing & development system. Same issue as on my main FS machine. Just so that you know this is not isolated to one PC in my case.

I'm afraid you got that wrong. That lever is never moved by itself and is supposed to stay in the armed position during landing.

Hey Kyle, that suggestion to delete all data in %localappdata% killed my iniManager as the .exe was in there too. And I don't think that was your intention :) In any case, I re-installed the manager but the problem with Liverpool persists. However, installing the new Malta release, I can see its scenery config options just fine. So the issue is indeed affecting Liverpool only.

Bought the scenery yesterday and for me the config options didn't show. I know that this sometimes happens after installation, in which case it is like you say, a refresh and all is well. However, this time the box did not just not show up. It was there but the box was empty. And a restart of the ini Manager didn't help.

Hi ini, is there any update on this? I'd love to buy the scenery but can't do that if you are unwilling to fix it. I mean I could buy it and then use the scenery editor to fix it myself. But that would be a rather bad deal for me. Please fix the vegetation, it was reported broken 3 months ago. Thank you!

Sounds as if you're running into similar issues with the terrain like some others have mentioned in this forum section. The developers have chosen to model the airport on custom 3D model terrain instead of default MSFS terrain. They stated that it was easier for them to model the airport well, but it is evident that there are many side effects that the competition does not have. Unfortunately, ini has not indicated whether they intend to correct the situation by remodelling their ground with proper MSFS2024 terrain. It's quite a shame, I would love to buy their EGLC, but won't be doing so when so many people see issues with ini's terrain techniques.

Hi @IniJamir , has there been any decision as to fixing this omission? I must admit I'm being hesitant to buy your VHHH, since I think this issue is rather important to be fixed for a true feel of this large airport. Without this additional detail the apron looks rather "boring" and low fidelity.

Great to hear, I'd love to buy this, just waiting for the scenery to get fixed.

Here you go. Thanks for passing this along.

Thanks for the explanation. It seems to me that circumventing default PG terrain has quite a lot of drawbacks in the case of EGLC. I know default terrain wouldn't be perfect, but at least we'd have proper ground texture detail, grass and GSX compatibility. It somehow worked for the other EGLC sceneries, but those obviously have other issues so I'd still prefer ini if it weren't for the terrain. I'll keep the scenery on my shopping list for now and hope for future improvements.

I agree, it's quite immersion breaking for an entire section of the village on short final to be completely flat. If ini could fill it with some low-fidelity UK houses, that would look so much better.