April 4Apr 4 Hi, Myself as many others have a big heart for the L1011! I really do hope you consider strongly to do 100/200 models to! I am gladly willing to pay for such a expension to. They had alot more operators than the Great -500.. Also with some very cool feutures as a inbuilt stair for main cabin. Please, i really hope to see this, the legacy of L1011 deserve it!
April 11Apr 11 I support the suggestion for the other variants! Many more were produced than the -500. I would gladly pay. I had not seen the first picture of those boarding stairs. Those stairs alone are so unique that they warrant the inclusion of the -1 variant!
April 16Apr 16 would love the short range versions as there were MANY more historic airline liveries and routes associated with them
April 18Apr 18 I actually just created an account to come here and say this, am glad I am not alone. The Tristar is such a unique and special airplane, to have all the variants properly modeled, even the freighter and a Sands VIP would be so special and I would pay for an expansion pack day 1. Would obviously hope to see the flight model adapted for each variant as well. If you guys did this, could also adapt the livery packs to reflect accurate operators of each variant instead of just patching everything onto the -500. The lower deck lounge was unique to the -100. I am really hoping that we get all the other variants of this aircraft, you guys did a great job with the -500 and I am sure it will improve and run smoother with continued updates.
April 18Apr 18 On 4/5/2026 at 10:42 AM, James42 said: I'm really hoping for a freighter. Would go hard
April 20Apr 20 With the Tristar being Inibuilds best airliner so far (just my two cents), it would make sense to do the other variants as well. Only time will tell...
April 21Apr 21 Also, could we get the old triple mix CIVA INS on the shorter range L1011 variants as well? I believe the CIVA was used on those earlier models.
April 22Apr 22 I found a reference photo of an L-1011 with an LTN-92. That would be amazing if we could use this unit, since it uses a navigation database similar to a modern FMS. The LTN-72 is cool, but let’s be honest, entering those coordinates and being limited to only nine is a pain in the neck. Besides, as far as I know, coordinate systems like the CIVA and LTN-72 were mainly used for oceanic crossings. I also think modeling an LTN-92 would attract more people to buy this plane, since it’s a step closer to how a modern FMS works. No need to enter coordinates and instead use navigation fix names. Something for iniBuilds to think about. 😉
Yesterday at 02:41 PM1 day Another vote for the other variants. Just thought I'd add that there's another dreamer out there!
5 hours ago5 hr Agreed, personally I find it ridiculous about this operations pack that while optional is a waste of resources, people bought a passenger aircraft for a tristar, why do we all of a sudden need "air-to-air refuelling, a strategic freighter, and a medical and humanitarian evacuation"I do have the pmdg 777F so at best I would use the freighter but neither of the other 2 in practice, cool, but I would personally not use (especially the humanitarian one), of course there are people out there that will but at the same time ini while they do aircraft that their dev team like, I understand but instead of doing what the community wishes and to be frank the better variants of the pax l1011 we get this stuff, it's just to say the least disappointing. And that probably includes not even a UNS-1 that was more commonly found later in the aircraft's cycle.
Create an account or sign in to comment