Jump to content

limbo

Member
  • Posts

    106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by limbo

  1. I loaded an autosave and now have about 40 fps before frame gen, flying over the black sea and whenever I try to use 4x time accel the aircraft will rock and the autopilot is immensely sluggish and sometimes as a result of this time accel behaviour due to the FPS the autopilot will disconnect
    However everytime I try to reengage the aircraft will do a crazy pitch up jerk and then well, disconnecting the autopilot which is extremely annoying I have to nearly pitch down to the max before I engage it just to fight the tendency it has, that should not be occurring at all

  2. image.thumb.png.ae0e451462eaa263b3e50eab7898d6ae.png
    The image above shows the inibuilds a340 in the simulator with the N1 indicators outlines EGT box outlines being grey, as well as below FOB and Flaps and Slats Indicator.
    However in the image below the outlines appear far more white then what inibuilds has put into the aircraft.
    Considering inibuilds thinks alot of airbus things are the same I am not surprised, oh well. I already posted this elsewhere a while back but reposting it again
    218783_big.jpg
    They are also white on the AeroLiss a340 so I think this is an inaccuracy by inibuilds.

  3. The Rudder on this aircraft seems to more like to sway the opposite side of the aircraft such as landing gear bogies. It is extremely difficult to maintain centreline with the crappy rudder, I don't know why it's like how it is, the wings sway, the landing gear bogie of opposite direction of the rudder comes off the ground, it's annoying. Let me know if you need a video

  4. [WASM CRASH REPORT] A350-900 – Crash during selecting new destination on SEC1 FPLN (FMS)

    Aircraft

    A350-1000

    Simulator

    MSFS 2024 - SU4

    Navdata

    NAVIGRAPH
     

    System Specs

    • CPU: i9 12900K
    • GPU: RTX4080 super
    • RAM: 64GB DDR5 4000 MHz

    WASM Error
    WASM: Error during MFD_gauge_update execution. Error code : 0xc0000005
    WASM: Module vfs://inibuilds-aircraft-a350/SimObjects/Airplanes/A350/attachments/inibuilds/Function_Interior_A350/panel/inibuilds-A350.wasm is now dirty

    Scenario Description

    Crash occurred on ground during cockpit preparation.

    Steps to Reproduce

    1. Aircraft powered, cockpit setup in progress, APU starting or started
    2. Flight plan inserted into FMS departure SID entered
    3. Arrival information entered into FMS
    4. Insert

     Immediate WASM crash
     

    Observed Behavior

    • All cockpit displays turned orange after inserting the arrival (WASM crash state)
      image.thumb.png.59ad0acecb20ceb55f49fb4e3a24ed16.png

    1775348519.bin

    • Haha 1
  5. I'm a bit confused, such as in the middle east where GPS Jamming is well quite common now on the ground I get GPS jamming with the pull up warning, in theory shouldn't the plane know it's on the ground cause of the landing gear sensors? Or does GPS jamming affect aircraft on the ground as well.

  6. I presume the RA callout logic on touchdown could be related to retard logic, if it isn't then my bad, however if it is the logic is still the same as it originally has been for quite a while and is not added.
    Retard does not abruptly cut off as soon as the thrust is set to idle in cockpit videos this doesn't seem to happen, Airbus A350 - Full Approach and Landing in Boston (ENG subtitles) in this video PF idles it and the computer calls it out twice however it does not cut off.
    The Flight Computer will call retard (only once) even if the thrust is set to idle before the callout as well.

     

    • Like 1
  7. Hello ini team, personally I am looking forward to the inibuilds a380, although I hope I'll be spared from disappointment, suspiciously to many times inibuilds has repeated we have learnt from xyz release however with the earlier release of the a340 it was again not feature complete on release with system features being added in later, while I don't expect crazy abnormals system depth (although many simmers love and appreciate system depth as shown countless times in navigraph surveys) I think it'd be better for things to be complete on release, alot of the time people will suggest to wait a few updates. I'd rather have a complete product in my hands instead of a "we'll release it when we think it's good enough" product (as said by staff in the discord once).
    Another thing, considering the amount of talk in introductory videos in relation to the flight models of the a350 and a340 I hope a key issue across all airbus fleets made by inibuilds so far doesn't have the glaring taking off like a 'helicopter' feeling/feeling immensely sensitive in pitch (which is only on takeoff) and while I want to believe you guys that data collected is accurate I just don't think it feels right, and that's only on takeoff, otherwise I think from a simmer standpoint the a350 and a340 handle fine. But also considering that you guys have used videos as references for general handling, takeoff just always feels weird from the a330 to the a350. Other aircraft for the sim don't seem to have an issue with this.
    I have also looked at Captain Paddle's takeoff videos in the a340-300 and 10-12.5 degrees back pressure is applied, he did the same technique in the inibuilds a340 and I could immediately tell it was not a smooth rotation and seemed to quick, although it all depends on weights of course, he did say that it feels quite laggy at higher weights. But the pitch sensitivity seems consistent no matter what the weight is on both the a350 and a340, as well as the pitch rotation, countless threads here have mentioned it but either have been dismissed in discord or ignored elsewhere.
    There also seems to be barley any gear compression for the a350 and a340, I remember there was a freeware mod for the a350 that added more gear compression as per real life although the person who made it just gave up on continuously fixing it.

    I think the community is the best resource for feedback but it seems all the belief in handling gets put on the real world pilots and I find that a bit of a chokehold as again and again the helicopter feeling is present, while I have never seen such in real world cockpit videos (which is stuff you guys use as well), I just don't understand how the takeoff issue gets dismissed. But oh well.

    Hoping the best for the a380 but please.. don't be marketplace exclusive like the tristar.. it's ridiculous even if it is to combat piracy especially with the L1011, the second it gets released on inimanager it's going to get pirated nothentheless, it may force people who really want it to buy which is good for the team, but most probably stick it out, I have 0 clue.

    I do apologise if this seems kind of arrogant/rude but I'd be curious if any of these disappointments I might as well call it that, that make me not enjoy ini aircraft as much could be fixed, to have the best possible experience for future aircraft, and on the off chance this helicopter feeling can be resolved with some further tuning, that would be great. (Among the other things mentioned)

    • Like 3
    • iniBuilds 1
  8. I understand the people complaining about the RA callouts quality, that wasn't good either but once again the tonality is all wrong
    The inibuilds sound team have once again stripped the callouts from those videos online of all the alerts and stuff, and they are mostly incorrect. Boris has made that mistake before, would be nice if inibuilds ever has to gather more references (not from a simulator) and record the loudspeaker with the ambience
    A minor thing to complain about, but here we are.

    • Thanks 1
  9. We don't need an ini 747 and while competition is good, the competition wouldn't rival what PMDG does at all. A DC10 would be good though however that's being made by a freeware dev. For me just depends on the price, current ini products cost way to much for what they offer.

  10. Hello, many other classic aircraft in this simulator have the paper flight bag and I just find it a bit silly to be honest, like a trend that gets dug into for no reason or benefit to a user other than cool and never use it again (but of course this is different in this case) like flushable toilets and stuff which is a plain waste of development time and instead should be put into stuff that matters.
    I'm all for the atmosphere of a classic aircraft but a paper flight bag seems a bit odd, but this is more than likely only going to be me.
    If it was an extremely old laptop or just an EFB I think it would be reasonable, but if it's done it's done.
    I hope this sets a new bar for inibuilds aircraft and while nobody could be able to deduce every single system working in this aircraft simply cause it's glass. I hope it is study level and even though being a completely different aircraft doesn't suffer from modelling issues or flight model issues (especially the latter, that are present on all airbus aircraft) that are refused to fix with certain excuses.

  11. @A330MRTT
    However, that is not the tonality of the voice of an a350 in contrast to every single cockpit video. (I'd presume OP there as I have said in that post got them from youtube as well)
    My assumptions are inibuilds (boris himself has done this in his work to. however corrected it) has taken samples from these youtube videos instead of getting additional references from the real aircraft, but however after telling Steve on discord which I am now banned from that they sound like you are wearing headphones and listening without ambient speaker kind of effect they were wrong.
    And then the sound team looked at the reference I attached and applied some noise reduction and put it in. It would be great if they could be recorded from the real aircraft, or atleast the level D simulator (sometimes those sound different to e.g. a320 simulators have a330 and 340 voice which is odd, but software I guess)
     

×
×
  • Create New...