nopixar

Same here. Had to force an altitude change to get climb back.

I’ve been very critical of INI but I have to disagree I think that sounds are much better. The sounds previously were very good from the perspective of a passenger and terribly mixed. The new sounds are a much better representation of how things should sound from the cockpit and balanced well. Which is ultimately what the whole point of the simulator is about! Too often comparisons are drawn from videos on YouTube and from cabins. The fade out of the engines with gain in altitude could be a tiny bit lower (around 15000ft) otherwise they are very good. Allbeit less “Hollywood” This is on 1.1.18.

Please can you fix the following issues. 1. The Flap sounds in cockpit are like you are sitting in the mechanism..crazy loud. 2. The mid range sounds of the engines Descending from cruise altitude ( flight idle) has an absolutely deafening roar…. I have to turn the volume down on my speakers. You shouldn’t be able to hear any of the engines whatsoever from the cruise. Just a low rumble. Thanks

I really admire your dedication to drawing light to these issues, however I would say they are in vain. it’s been 9 months since this aircraft has been released and whilst there have been improvements along the way it’s still such a buggy aircraft. Along the way I’ve had everything from WASM crashes, weird flight dynamics, weird sounds, incorrect system behaviours.. all sorts. I think we just have to concede now that this isn’t going to be the aircraft that we hoped it would be. Don’t get me wrong I think the model of this aircraft is absolutely insane. There are some nifty touches as well with how some of the systems work like the mailbox etc. The art team deserve a lot of praise. But there are so many elements of this aircraft that frustrated me. My rig runs absolutely beautifully with other payware. Never really had crashes never had any problems. It’s only with INI aircraft. I keep getting pulled back by the hot fixes hoping that it will be different but it hasn’t been for the most part and still exhibits certain basic behaviours that it did on day one. Both on 2020 and now 2024. I also made the mistake of getting the A340. Two flights which of course you guessed, resulted in WASM crashes. All I did was change the approach procedure midflight 😆 Think we just have to accept this is what they offer. It’s a LITE company with great modelling. Nothing more. Which is a shame because I come from their Xplane days with the A300 which was an absolutely sublime aircraft. Once you accept the product for what it is it bugs you less. I’m currently redoing a shorthaul flight I did in the A350 in the trusty Fenix A320. The only word I can use to describe the feeling is “relief”.

Indeed I reported this in another thread too.

On the contrary. His post is absolutely brilliantly formatted and even opened with thank you to the Inibuilds team. Makes it easier to read and easier to see what’s been found/fixed. There was no need to you to add your happiness/what deem as money value to a bug post to compensate. There are hundreds maybe thousands of people out there happy with the captainsim 777. That’s brilliant for them. Enjoy your aircraft in peace and let people who have found bugs use the correct forum to bring them to the attention of the team. “Well it hasn’t happened to me” doesn’t mean that it’s not happening. A quick glance of the support forum/discord would’ve showed that. Well done to the poster for taking the time to format it I’m sure inbuilds appreciate the clarity, nothing worse than trying to trawl through random fluff to fix issues.

I cant help with the why, but Ive noticed loads of people having WASM crashes using Navigraph as the navigation source. And you error code suggests an issue reading Navigraph. Since switching to the MSFS database I havent had any crashes related to flightplans. As far as I know there is no benefit using one compared to the other so is worth a try. The sims database gets uploaded almost monthly anyway (currently on AIRAC 2502) I got a few crashes uplinking flight plans using the Navigraph source but 0 crashes since switching.

As per title. There have been numerous reports of the "control response" on the rotation of this aircraft dotted around here and discord, and with good reason. Regardless of weight the aircraft leaps into the air with the tinyest input. You've said in other posts its been tested by pilots and is accurate. I beg to differ. You've also stated in other posts that we should provide evidence for inaccuracies and that the inaccuracies we percieve are "placeobo" Again, I beg to differ. So ill include as much info as possible. MFS2020 Both 900 and 1000s do it Turbulence LOW Please see attached photo (Real World) Please pay close attention to the SSOI (Side Stick Order Indicator) box circled in yellow on the PFD above. This is the initial input for a nice controlled gradual 3 deg second rotation at VR. As you can see its somewhere between 40-50% pitch deflection which is normal for Rotation law equiped aircraft (the 350 is one of them) somewhere around 5+ deg mark on the PFD is a good start for a nice controlled 3deg per second roation....While not A350 I do have experience on newer air frames like the 320/321 NEO family. The rotation law (is the same for both). When rotating an aircraft with rotation law the deflection you make commands a rotation rate as opposed to G load or Elevator deflection. Can you clarify why the INI350 rotates like a fighter jet with almost no deflection? THS setting doesnt come into it as long as its set properly the "feel" should be fairly uniform. You need a fairly signifacant/deliberate pull to acheive 3 deg second and can adjust the deflection as you see fit to either increase or decrease the rate. This is modelled pretty nicelly on both the FBW 320/380 which is freeware. Its also modelled on the Toliss/FF350. Another video. Again notice how much back pressure is needed to acheive the desired rotation rate (50% roughly) Pulling this much on the INI350 would result a Farbrough airshow style departure. Also the INI350 seems to get airborn with an unaturaly flat attitude (somewhere around 4deg) Again not represtative of the plane, or any plane. I suspect you havent modelled rotation law at all which is why the aircraft leaps into the air with almost no deflection whatsover. Is it even modelled? If not please consider adding it. Currently it takes off like a Cessna 172. Sometimes it even starts rotation by itself. I know some people might not care but when its being marketed as a faithfull rendition of a 350 would be nice if it shared some of its fundemental flying characteristics. Thanks

For 1. Using the down arrow on the MFD keypad allows you to go through the list.

Yes the scroll function is "upside down" for those switches. Not sure if on purpose or by accident..

This happened to me too. I switched the nav database back to the MSFS one from navigraph navdata and haven’t have an uplink crash since..

How the plane rotates really bugs me too. It literally takes off like a crisp packet in the wind… and the way the pitch control works initially has zero smoothnes…It does detract from an absolutely gorgeous looking aircraft with some small bugs but also some great features. The whole flight model is…questionable at best. It’s a shame really I was really looking forward to this. It’s not unflyable, but when it behaves like that, you can’t help but be bothered by it considering all the hype around it. And yet nobody during testing not even the real pilots who streamed it said a word about it. No flare mode either…? You can pretty much make no inputs all the way down to the ground…. Really hoping it improves over time with patches…

I had this too. I reverted back to default navigation and it loaded fine. Was using Navigraph initially..

You shouldn’t be able to hear the buzz of the engine as altitude increases. As air density reduces the harmonic resinance of the sound of the fan blades should dissipate. The only thing you should hear from the cockpit as altitude increases the sound of the airflow hitting the windshield. They’ve done a fantastic job of replicating this in the new version. As a pilot myself, I hope they don’t change this. It is correct. PMDG and Fenix also model this very very well.

Have to agree, there’s definitely something up with the lift. Even with a flap 15/0 takeoff at high weights rotating through about 5° the aircraft is already off the ground. I flew the A300 in xplane extensively and it didn’t behave anything like this.