Suggestions

Is there any chance there will be any new A350 liveries in the future? I just tried to recreate a Japan Airlines flight but noticed it was an A35K and there's no JAL liveries for that variant just the 900. Also the JAL A359 has a max passenger capacity of 369 people but the official Simbrief profile for all A359s states 324 passengers max. Thanks

Fslabs and now Fenix allows users to adjust the v pilot comm1/2 volume through the VHF volume adjustment knobs. Please can this be implemented for Inibuilds aircraft? I think it's really important as users on vatsim have widely different mic volumes and I often go from getting my ear drums blown out, to having to increase volume.

Just adding my voice of concern as to the lack of new and additional liveries missing from the Marketplace. Many of them, such as Delta's Centennial Livery are timely and very popular and many users would love to have it, including myself. Seems to be a missed opportunity as to why liveries for iniBuilds aircraft (The A300-600 is another example) are not being added more routinely and consistently to the MSFS Marketplace.

To be honest, when I saw the current version of the cabin, I really felt a bit disappointed. This is not what a company known for high-precision details should do. Why can't two cabin options be provided for players to choose from? In this way, the additional cabin pack can still be used, and we can continue to see the high-definition cabins of Inibuilds. What's not to like?

Dear IniBuilds team, Is it possible to get another texture option for the cockpit seats in the A350 where we can choose from? The following pictures show that some airlines (e.g., ITA Airways and the German Air Force) use different covers for their cockpit seats: It would be great if we could choose between the two variants. Best regards,

Hey guys, I am on the newest version on 2024 and got this weird glitch on the winglets?

I understand the removal of the cabin packs, and requirement to use only the default cabin was done to increase performance, but I wasn't having any performance issues, and really enjoyed the cabin packs that properly represented each airlines cabin. I'm sorry but this was a big step backwards in the product and its immersion factor. Can was please have an option to continue to use the cabin packs, or to roll back to 1.1.6?

Since the new update, the back cargo door of the plane is missing the texture after it opens and close during boarding.

Frustratingly when printing a new printout, say a METAR while something else was printed and pinned immediately deletes it. Having to reprint it again. Printing a new printout while something was pinned should keep it pinned until you click on the new printout.

Hi everyone, It may just be my OCD, but the first thing I do when I load up the A350 is walk through the cabin and open all the curtains. I can understand that they may be closed by default for performance reasons. However, given the new cabin's excellent performance, could you consider making the curtains open by default? This would be more realistic, as the curtains are both open at the gate or on the runway, no matter where you start your flight. Cheers!

Texture loss The color of the pads under the wiper has faded. This issue has occurred on all the planes. I have removed all the paint jobs that don't belong to this version. Currently, this is the default appearance. I hope it can be fixed. Thank you.

Back around 7-10 years ago the flaps sound were a lot different back then, sounding more loud. here is a link to a video taken years back during covid. An a350 with an old flaps sound. my suggestion is to add this exact flap sound as an option in the settings of the efb or as a seperate variant of the plane itself.

iniBuilds, and fellow A350 pilots, I want to start by saying the iniBuilds A350 my favorite aircraft to take on long haul flights. And I am in the process of designing a "Airbus" home cockpit, of which, I want all Airbus types (except A300 & 310) to be compatible with. I know in the iniBuilds A320, the HTML based OIS/EFB pops out and retains full interactivity, which is fantastic. However, for most of your target audience for the A350, the FMCs are the heart of your product, and not being able to control them on their dedicated monitors should be classified as a issue. I do understand why this is the case. WASM gauges render differently than the HTML-ba…

Please give us an option to disable the Table / Keyboard Extension. It comes out many times durring a flight, unwanted, because we click on it for camera movements.

Hi I want to map two functions to keys, but can't currently in the 350. Would really like to see an LVAR for the PUR call button, rather than having to push it with the mouse delete this...it now appears OK Would like to see an LVAR for the SURV DEFAULT SETTINGS and CONFIRM KEYS, so save having to open up the Surv page.

I just wondering why the A350 dont have a Copilot. The A340 have it, so why not have it in the A350? Or have i been missing some settings? I have been looking thrue the EFB, but could not remember to seen it there. It feels to empty and unreal with the empty seat. Best regards Olav

Please add Window Shades on External also for the no Cabin Version.

Hello iniBuilds team, I am a user of the iniBuilds A350 and I have encountered an issue in the simulator related to a decal or model element that I cannot fix myself. I hope you can look into this and provide a fix. Issue description: On the A350-900ULR variant, one of the “NO STEP” markings on the left engine (the side closer to the cabin windows) does not move together with the engine when it flexes. Instead, it stays static relative to the fuselage. As a result, when performing large maneuvers (where the wings and engines visibly flex), this decal will appear to either float out or sink into the engine surface when viewed from the cabin. Additional obs…

Are there any plans to add more cabins to Japan Airlines?