Farlis

Nontheless that is another tick on the list of things that competitors at this price range do offer. For this kind of money I fully expect this to be correcly simulated. That's not what I'm seeing. It takes a while but it does warm up the cabin.

You have to set the set the default graphic quality of MSFS2024 to at least "High": I assume your's is on "medium" or less.

I noticed that when you sit on the ground with packs off and all air conditioning switched off the temperature readings inside the aircraft seem wrong. Usually one can expect them to be similar or higher than outside temperature, considering that the fans are not running and the aircraft is sitting in direct sunlight. 13°C with outside Temperature of 23°? I don't think so.

No it won't. Since when does default Simdata not provide these? Since never.

Obviously not, if there are still deviations from the correct behaviour of the systems like this.

How much more detailed of an explanation do you need? I already told you in the 3rd Party Tab. Look it up yourself. Page 41.

I'm just trying to figure out what is realistic here: The base cabin comes for Lufthansa comes with either the default or the Allegris business class. Is the Lufthansa cabin from the cabin pack the actual standard Lufthansa Layout? So that one would be used it for the D-AIV* registrations and the Allegris version would be used for the D-AIX* registrations, correct?

That's odd. One should only hear the slats extending in the first phase and not the flaps. I don't hear what happens in your video on my end. Only the long whine as the slats extend. Which is realistic. The flaps I don't hear at all from the cockpit. Which is also correct.

That only works if VATSIM has a controller broadcasting an ATIS and if there are no dedicated Arrival and Departure Atis' then you have to select "None" before requesting it. That will work.

I appreciate your dedication to community feedback. The product may not be were it could be at this moment but your continued work on it and the improvements do not go unnoticed. Some more under the hood improvements for a couple of months and you will have truly an add on that is deserving high accolades and where the asked price reflects the high standards that should come with it. And then I'm sure people will also be more willing to pay you some extra money for new cabin packs.

While I have the same issue in 2024 it is only a menu problem. The aircraft loads just fine in the sim itself.

I must say I found this idea to sell them seperately quite outrageous given the state the aircraft is in and what it is being sold for. At 90€ this is firmly based in the high fidelity, all nuts and bolts modeled price class. Like the Leonardo Maddog or the PMDG fleet of Boeing aircraft. However if you look at what has been delivered for this so far, if you look through the numerous feedback posts in the systems subforum that point out bugs and omissions in systems modeling, flight path computing etc, then it should be clear that the product is still not up to that tier. I have no doubt that if you continue to work on it at the same pace as you did so far, you will get it there. One can decide now whether to think it was sold about 30€ above its worth, or simply at least 9 months too early. Either way to now try to get even more money through cabin packs before the product is even in a state that truly warrants its price, is really rubbing me all the wrong ways. Bring the aircraft up to the standards of the competiton in your price range before you even consider trying to get more money from customers for add ons to it.

He can rest when they finally implement all of his fixes that are not caused by differert avionics suites of the aircraft. 😉

I have a suspicion that this has to do with the new seperately sold cabin packs. Lufthansa is among them. Did you try the no cabin version of the aircraft?

And you know this how exactly?

I third this. We absolutely need the default Airbus fleet to be compatible with the Winwing MCDU.

No it's not a bug. It's MSFS24 telling you that it exceeded the VRAM capacity of your GPU. You are just seeing this for the first time with the A350 but you will see it often if you don't reduce your settings.

This is GSX support issue it seems not an IniBuilds one.

The steps he described in this thread clearly point that this is not a matter of where he puts the aircraft. Something in the sim, I suspect a setting in the Developer Mode, is preventing the compilation of the WASM data that is necessary to run this aircraft. If his initial load after installation is done after 30 seconds than something went wrong. It should take at least 15 minutes the first time.

There are no refunds for digital products. Some companies offer them regardless, Inibuilds does not. And on top of that a refund policy for a faulty products only applies if a product is really faulty. In this case it is not, it is the system of the end user that is faulty because it is not compiling the software as it should.

Depending on your system up to 20 Minutes.

No it isn't. Actually I just tried it again in the A350 and it is now working. It was probably a bug in the Navigraph Data and since there has been a new Airac Cycle since my report it seems to have been fixed since then.

Yeah that's one of those things: I noticed these issues back in MS2020 with the rolling cache and therefore never used it. When they announced that the rolling cache would be mandatory for MS2024 I foolishly assumed they had ironed out those issues because you now can't escape using it. Turns out they did not. So be sure to do this regularly, as counterintuitive as it may seem.

This one I'm not so sure of Michel. Visual differences can often come down to different software suites in the aircraft modeled. I would be hard pressed to believe that the artists at IniBuilds would not be able to draw a dashed line when their reference material tells them to do so. So I assume that the aircraft they based that appearance on is using a different version of the software and is drawing these differently than the ones you work on.

In the OIN under 3rd Party. Du schaust auf die Option für den Kartenprovider nicht auf die für die Navigationsdatenbank.