foliainfx

Does it change if you press REFRESH?

Afaik the A350-1000ULR isn't planned

There's nothing to show. It show precipitation, not clouds.

Since the wiper switch is probably the best visible in the pic, this is what it looks like irl.

In the iniBuilds A350 the knobs and switches in the middle have this very thin grayish texture, irl it's noticeably thicker and a lot darker (black).

Currently in the iniBuilds A350 all screws are facing the same exact direction and have no variation. In real life they tend to have slightly varied directions due to vibrations and turbluence as seen in the attached pictures. It would be nice to have this implemented if possible.

Use the website.

That's a WASM crash. The EFB doesn't have this because it runs with HTML, CSS and JS rather than C(++) (uses WASM).

This is what it looks like in the ini if you base it off irl references

Does it work with the normal 2024 version? Try clearing your wasm folder.

And maybe ini shouldn't be so resistant to advice and facts. My personal opinion but I am sure many will agree. I wonder what their customers think about working less on updates.

Actually, you are right, I thought you meant the line on the VD indicating the vertical path. Apologies for the misunderstanding

Step descents aren't implemented currently, iirc they wanted to implement this at a later point

It's dashed when the FCU altitude is different from the CRZ ALT entered, this should also be fixed in the next update already

In the next update there should already be a few things fixed (RADIO HEIGHT, constraints). VIEW ALONG ACFT TRK will be implemented at a later point is what I got told previously

So your issue is that when you manually tune the frequency, the values get reset?

Send an image of your RMP

Ini know about this issue, it should be fixed in the large update

It's not unlikely they're just straight up ignoring you to prevent you from getting a refund (since the product doesn't work) actually. Wait for a response, if they don't answer within a week ask about it. They've been ignoring my ban appeal for a while now.

Try doing a full deinstall, with all files deleted and then reinstalling.

The first load after an update/install will be WASM compiling, this will take quite a lot of time compared to other loads. While this compiles you can switch to other tabs just fine. The time varies, it's 10-15 minutes roughly on average.

I agree with what you've said. Still my primary focus is that their reference pilots agree with the incorrect model. If those pilots are flying the same spot irl they would in the sim, they are a safety hazard to flight crew and passengers. Their seating position would be too high throwing their flight path angle perception off and can cause issues operating the rudder aswell as instruments. I have attached an image which is according to Airbus a too high seating position. This gets really close to the false position (according to them and their pilots right) in the iniBuilds. I hope iniBuilds will take necessary measures as this is a hazard that should not be happening, especially under several pilots.

The A350 only has 4 autobrake types: - BRK MED - BTV - BTV CONTAM - RTO (MAX in other aircraft)

iniBuilds know about this issue, it should be fixed in the next update, ini have several issues with the VD since release in terms of correctness

Although iniBuilds keep denying this problem, it is 100% the case that the cockpit model is wrong. The correct pilot position in the iniBuilds varies from the real pilot position. The first image shows the seating position that is correct according to iniBuilds, the position however does not show the DU pb. The second image shows an Airbus safety first article (https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/are-you-properly-seated/ fig.1 Eye reference point principle) providing a guide on how to be seated properly during critical flight phases. The third image shows the pilot position seen through META glasses. On both the second and third image two things show: the DU pb are visible and the blind area (see Airbus safety article, fig.7) are the same, while in the ini A350 the blind area does not match the safety article. I have been told that iniBuilds' reference pilots have been flying their A350 in the same position as seen in the first image attached, if this is indeed the case in real life I expect iniBuilds to take reasonable action as an incorrect position during critical flight phases is a safety hazard to crew and passengers.