Crabby

However I believe that hydraulic pumps are like Meatloaf. Two Out of Three Ain't Bad

confirmed.

Time and money. How much would you be willing to spend on this addition to a freeware aircraft? If nothing, then it is not that important for realism, is it?

Published information shows 350-400 million dollars. My guess is that the INI version will be somewhat less than that.

Never was an "issue".

Not many controllers have an actual reverse throttle axis. If you have one of the majority controllers without, doing this will add a fake amount of axis as a reverse and cause many to go in and out of reverse at the most inopportune moments imaginable.

The shortcomings of the sim (ASOBO/Microsoft issue) related to the data that is available to create a weather radar are well known. Just be aware that those that talk about how this radar or that radar works or should work, do not know what a weather radar is, how it works and what it should display at the various tilts/gains/settings. They see green, red and yellow blobs on a screen and think "wow this works". They are wrong.

Since others have seen this, care to let us know what the culprit was?

There has got to be a local issue/conflict here. I start cold and dark and never have seen this on any version. I would start with control bindings even/especially if you think there is no issue there. Next, empty your community folder. Completely empty it and only use the house livery. You can empty the folder by simply copying and pasting the contents to another location, however if you want to take control and master you community folder and addons, use MSFSAddons Linker from flightsim.to. This way you can quickly add things back in however I would recommend you keep your sim as debloated as possible. There are many advantages to this. I only start the sim with the two airports I am using (if addons), the plane and livery I will use. That's it. (Navigraph is always loaded).

Since no new update has been published, everyone is awaiting a new update. The moment that new update is published; everyone will be awaiting yet another new update. Since that is reality, I am not sure of the purpose of these types of posts.

It would have taken less time to publish the list than make that recommendation.

Impossible to tell because I don't know when I will run out of buttons or voice. Everything for the FCU, FMC, Light switches, Gear, Fuel control, Fuel Levers, Master Eng MODE. I would suggest that since INI has them in some format, like an excel, just publish all of them.

Can INI provide a list of LVARS to be used for programming AAO?

What runway? What was the weather (e.g. rain)? What was the wind? What flap setting did you use? Did you try packs off? What was the outside temperature? Barometer? Just because the max certified TOW is X does not mean you can just load it up that way. The EFB calculates a "SAFE" take off profile not just spit out Vspeeds for the sake of it.

Another reason I use AAO.

FCOM for the A310 and A300 urgently available with a simple google search. I have had one since two months before release. BTW, A310 and A300 are essentially identical in operation and only vary in weights.

Ok, weird. I just looked and that is how I have it set up through AAO using the Honeycomb B.

Adapt this to whatever hardware (TQ) you are using. How to setup your Honeycomb Bravo Throttle Quadrant (fenixsim.com)

Set up your throttle axis Set button to Reverse Hold. Your throttle should now increase the "reverse" amount. More throttle, more reverse. Now, I use AAO and my button has an on/off that I can use. On=reverse hold off= engines idle (reversers stowed). Not sure how you do all thin inside of MSFS, as I don't use it for my controls. I am sure if you do a search you will find an answer.

That's what I meant, though it is not just when manually braking, it is when you apply more manual pressure than the A/B is applying. This is a way for the pilot to tell the computer "I got this now, go back to sleep". Did you check the tires? Not sure if blown tires are modeled but they are on other planes. I am throwing crap against the fan because I don't see this.

Are the autobrakes still on?

Ok, gotcha. Could be. Could be a problem with the navdata source (in the case of the INI 300, default sim). Could be a conflict too, if using Navigraph to replace the sim data. I would disable Navigraph in sim data (if you use it) and see what happens in this very instance. It could give a clue where the fault lies.

I thought you would understand, the plane was developed in the early 70's and the RNAV systems were not capable of curved segments, like the tear drop on the approach you used. It is not a bug. It is an old plane with old systems that needs to be flown. The ND will not even draw curved segments like a teardrop.

Forgot to add, October 1972. First flight of the A300-600

It was 1972 and Vietnam was still in the nightly news. The USA was still sending men to the moon and Chuck Berry had a hit single called My Ding-a-Ling. Also noteworth, but barely reported, RNAV systems at the time could not fly curved segments. Pilots had to fly to SER, then outbound on 129 radial using NAV (not RNAV), then at or before 17 dme they would initiate a left turn to intercept using HDG. Ahh, the days of pilots doing pilot crap.