Alexair

Hi, no worries, I was just wondering. Thanks for your reply...

Thanks for your reply, I'm glad it's taken into account...

No reply from Inibuilds? A lost cause "again"?

No reply from Inibuilds? A lost cause "again"?

Here is a list of bugs in MSFS 2020: Either flaps not producing enough lift or pitch/lift issue. Cannot approach below 120 kts without having at least 10 deg nose up. Totally unrealistic. Turboprop of this kind should be approaching much slower with a nose down tendency This aircraft doesn't represent a specific Fokker 27, it's a mix breed between the -100 and the -200 (engine power, weights, etc.). Stick with one, even if it's not requested by Microsoft Pitot heaters lights are always ON when switched ON, should be the opposite (Lights ON when OFF) In cold and dark, both spill valves should be OPEN, first one NORMAL after engine start, the second one NORMAL after passing 3000 to 5000 ft Same for EXTRA COCKPIT HEATER, should be OFF in cold and dark TOTAL POWER indicators should show indication only when anti-icing switched ON, should not show anything when OFF Propeller animations are really ugly, should show a disk, not rotating blades FUEL FILTER HEATERS should be red only if filter getting iced up / clogged, not all the time when flying Weather radar never show anything anytime (people reported working, not on my side) Main passengers stairs/door doesn't fully deploy, remain almost horizontal ITT is always too low Power reduction after takeoff should be 14200 rpm not 400lb. F27 is flown at 14200rpm max, never at max rpm Hope you'll fix those quick...

Just got the F406, here is a list of bugs in MSFS 2020: Right emergency exit doesn't open (show open in EFB though) Only the right main door open, the left main have no option to open it Propellers axis are inverted (fixed in MSFS binding though, but still) In cold and dark bleed source select should be OFF not BOTH (PT-6s are never started with bleed open) Trim needed for takeoff (either empty or max gross) is WAY out AFT of the white range Trim effectiveness is very poor/slow, should be much more effective and precise Torque variation is almost non-existent when changing propeller pitch Torque variation is almost non-existent when opening/closing the inertial separators all 3 attitude indicators's blue and brown colors should be totally filled up with their respective colors, not 2/3 with the rest black The flaps indicator pointer should move at the same rate than the flaps speed, not at the same pace you move the flaps handle Hope you'll fix those quick...

Any update or is it another lost cause again ?

The freeware F-27 available on flightsim.to is maybe a bit less appealing visually, but much more evolved system wise and the flight envelop is way much better. It's free and better, cannot go wrong here...

Same for me.

The main door stop about halfway through when opening it. No issue when closing.

The Fokker 27 Max takeoff weight should be between 43500 and 45000 depending the model/serial. Not 40500.

Propellers animation is totally ugly, we should see a disk not turning blurry blades.

The Fokker F27-500 climb profile is 138 IAS and 14200 RPM. However, at this speed and power settings it cannot even hold altitude at 3000ft (fuel trim is at 100% though), thus climb profile is way off of what it should be... Also, at max power and straight & level flight at 3000ft it can barely reach 180 IAS. Again, way off... Same for approach, way off. 14000 rpm to barely hold the approach speed with an empty aircraft is totally wrong. At "inibuild" max gross weight (way below what it should be) it cannot even maintain 3.0 glide at 115 IAS. Also, the elevator lack authority/effectiveness. Hey guys at Inibuild, next time before publishing an aircraft, make sure to beta test it! I'm tired of being a "paying-beta-tester" and having to wait forever to have patches and updates (still waiting updates for A310, A300, YS-11...). 20$ wasted, last airplane I'm buying from you... By the way, the freeware F27 on flightsim.to is maybe a bit less appealing visually, but way more interesting to fly with proper systems...

Thanks! I'm based there if you need info or else...

To make it quick and simple, the service ceiling is the maximum altitude at which an aircraft can still maintain a rate of climb of 100 ft/min. You have also the absolute ceiling, which is the altitude where the climb rate becomes 0 ft/min. And finally, you have the operational ceiling altitude limit imposed by certification, systems, or operations (pressurization, oxygen, regulations, etc.). So, you can indeed have an aircraft that is capable of climbing much higher but is limited by its system(s), most of the time the pressurization (how the system is built, how the airframe can handle a bigger differential, how fast can you descent in regards of oxygen (for pax mostly as the oxy for crew is generally more than enough while for the pax it's very limited in time)). So, it's not only what the aircraft can do by itself, it's more of a global picture : powerplant, airframe, system(s), oxygen (passengers limitation mostly), etc... Not talking about the YS-11 in particular, but in general.