All Activity

I know I know, the 330 is technically an Asobo product but are there any plans to improve the 330? While it has come some way since the release of 2024, it would be great to see it get some much needed love especially around the flight model and landing gear contact points

Great to see you Cap! :)

You are on 1.14.4? You should see the full panel in Discover. Go to Profiles, create a Profile, the select Fragments. Here you can create screen fragments for the portions of the panel you want to use.

Looks like this add on is slowly turning into a FSS E-jets drama. Is it also going to take 2 years to sort this plane out? Its already been almost a year and there are still major issues unresolved! Maybe a refund would be in order - very disappointed.

And can you tell me how to do it? Because even with the latest update, it won't let me partition them.

Incheon International Airport (RKSI) is one of the busiest and most important mega-hubs in East Asia, connecting major routes all over the world. However, there is currently "no proper", "high-fidelity" scenery available for this airport in the MSFS market right now. It would be absolutely fantastic if iniBuilds could step in and develop Incheon International Airport. Many simmers are eagerly waiting for a top-tier developer to bring this amazing airport to life.

I see. I would understand if it is not high in your list at the moment as it is a too niche and rare procedure for the a350v2, however, another improvement point to your complex electrical simulation is the Integrated Modular Avionics as faults such as the fws 1+2 & CPIOM faults can be triggered by your existing elec sim by screwing around in the failure options (Consult your engineers for this one, as most if not all systems rely on CPIOMs for communication) and this fault appears upon cold and dark startup then disappears. There are at most 24 CPIOM's divided into 5 groups that control all system communications of the A350. The CRDC is a remote gateway and data concentrator module that interfaces the following aircraft systems to the avionics network: ‐ A wide range of sensors and/or actuators ‐ Conventional avionics equipment not compatible with the avionics network. L3 The CRDC transforms data signals from a specific format (e.g. ARINC 429 data buses, analog signals) into digital format usable by the aircraft systems connected to the avionics networks, and vice versa. L1 Most of the aircraft systems that use CRDCs are connected to two or more CRDCs, to ensure the redundancy of all functions of the aircraft systems. L2 There are 29 CRDCs. L1 The CRDCs are in the pressurized area of the aircraft, next to the relevant groups of sensors and actuators. . Two types of avionics equipment monitor and control the aircraft systems: ‐ The conventional avionics equipment, with computers that are fully assigned to a specific aircraft system, or ‐ The CPIOMs that can host several functions dedicated to different aircraft systems. The CRDCs are an interface between some conventional avionics equipment and the avionics networks. The CPIOMs, the CRDCs, and some conventional avionics equipment are directly connected to the avionics networks. Also, please note that I heard this feedback and the reset panels is for the a350v2 which is a native fs24 which has a SDK can support this deep system simulation. I am also looking forward to any attempts at reset panels if it is doable in the fs24 sdk. Hope this helps and consult your inhouse pilot's FCOM as this might be outdated!

Noted. Thanks for the reply!

So does that mean you are adding planes to MSFS 2024 PS5, like, do you add every week? Is PlayStation not accepting, or Microsoft Flight Simulator?

Hi, Thank you for your reply. I can confirm that the default handcrafted Dubai (OMDB) has been disabled in the Content Manager (My Library), but the static aircraft are still showing up. Here are the additional steps I have already taken: 1.Toggled "Static Aircraft" to OFF in the iniManager. 2.Manually renamed omdb-scene-statics.bgl to omdb-scene-statics.disabled in the Community folder. 3.Set "Aircraft Traffic Quantity " to Off in the MSFS 2024 settings. Despite these changes, the static planes remain visible. Could you please advise if there is another way to force the simulator to stop loading these static models? Thank you for your help!

After searching the update page I see I am using the correct mode (LEGACY). To be fair I should say I have only flown the plane in version 1.0.8 so I never actually saw the scroll rate prior to 1.0.7. All that being said it takes me a lot of spinning the scroll wheel to set speeds, courses, heading and altitudes especially compared to the A300, A340 and A350. Is this what others are seeing or is something wrong on my end?

@iniKyle, I do, however, have a complaint about this particular gate: 😄There is a static model of a tug placed right where the "real" pushback tug has to go to attach to the plane. It needs to be removed entirely or repositioned elsewhere. Thanks!

Yep, that option was disabled. Lesson learned!

Thank you, will check. I've encountered this issue with other airports (both from iniBuilds and other devs) so that does lead me to believe there's a GSX config issue here, as I always ensure I have the latest profiles installed before I fly.

Hi y'all, Stumbled on this this wonderful Post by accident. Big fan of the A300 for well over a year now and love flying the "dirty" FDX and UPS birds. Always reverted to ILS approaches whenever possible and could not quite master the RNAV procedures. Big thank you to everyone's contribution, especially the fact that I'm applying A321 logic to a 1986 old airplane. Thanks for making this plane even more enjoyable. Fritz

Hello👋🏽 Since work is being done with the A350 (which looks amazing), I’ll risk it and take a chance and suggest; Would it be possible to add a “mock” D-ATIS, which literally pulls sim-weather data, and presents it under the D-ATIS page? The A350 is the only Inibuilds Airbus that doesn’t have a METAR avaliable in the EFB, so if you’re on Xbox, you have to look up the airport weather using the msfs EFB. While this works of course, it simply isn’t as immersive and cool (lol). Thanks for any consideration🙏🏽

Thanks for the reply! I'm using Navigraph with Beyond ATC. And all Navdata are updated, still figuring out how to trouble shoot

The only time I have been getting crashes is on flights longer than 6-7 hours roughly around 8 hours, I doesn't WASM crash it crashed to the desktop. I have deleted the WASM folder and have had 2 9+ hour flight that have been completed.

Thanks. I cleared the WASM folder last night per the advice of AI. I'm now in the midst of a 6-hour cross-Atlantic flight; so far, OK. This is the issue: with this plane, you often have time committed to long flights, and when a WASM crash happens deep into a flight, it is very upsetting and shouldn't happen. Anyway - let's see if it performs now. Is this something I need to do now as part of periodic maintenance to prevent future crashes?

Kyle, thank you very much again. I really appreciate your help. It was a pleasure to work with you. it’s a neat aircraft to fly. Now that it’s going, I can spend some time learning more about it. Hey, one interesting observation. In my old set up that did not work correctly, the nose wheels at the gate were straight. Using your set up, which now is working, at the gate they are crooked, which I know you have observed in the past! Take care, Joe

My cockpit interaction is set to legacy

Thanks mister Kyle!🙏🏽

Enjoy!

Hi Miguel, Please do let us know if the feature continues to work properly once you enable it on every flight. Glad to hear you’re enjoying the aircraft! Thanks!