All Activity

Hello inibuilds team, I hope you’re doing well. I’m writing to respectfully ask if you would reconsider the ban on my Discord account (rithr#5323) When I contacted support, I was told the reason for the ban was “misuse of your account.” I genuinely don’t understand what that means, and I would really appreciate some clarification. I am not in any piracy servers or anything like that and it seems unfair to me that I was removed without any warning The only thing I can think of is that I made a post about “A350 nose gear too stiff” that was removed. I reposted it because I wasn’t sure why it had been taken down and thought it may have been removed by mistake. I’ve been a member of the server for over a year and have always enjoyed being part of the community. I purchased A350 for nearly $100 on release and have only tried to contribute by reporting bugs, suggesting improvements, and participating in discussions If I made a mistake, (which I don’t know what it is) I take responsibility for it. I only ask that you consider the context and understand that there was no malicious intent behind my actions. I would be very grateful for the opportunity to rejoin the community. Even if the ban cannot be lifted, I would greatly appreciate a clearer explanation of what “misuse of your account” specifically refers to so I can understand what happened. Thank you

There is indeed no APU exhaust coming from either GE/PW Freighters.

No. There's no news on pricing. Read synaptic's FAQ on the website. This is all public information that's easily able to be searched up before making a post anywhere.

Why are there so little liveries made? Looks like this plane is dead on arrival . So sad .

I'll ask the team, should have an answer by Tuesday.

Is the new MOZA MCDU supported in the A340? (and their EFIS and MCDU, for that matter 🙂 )

Got it, thank you for checking that and I'll make note of the DHL livery missing. I believe it was brought up awhile back but I'll still run it past the team just to be sure. Thank you :)

No problem! Any time, getting a bit cooler for a few days so I can do a bit more! It’s always annoying that the updates come out and so I try them out and then notice stuff ha. I wish I had the sixth sense to do some flying in these aircraft whilst the updates are being prepared!

I'll get this logged for the team, thank you for taking the time to break these down and provide references/media. The efforts are always greatly appreciated by myself and the team :)

Will do. Will you be doing anything for the interior? Not critical, just inquisitive is all.

Sorry, yet another thing. I have set the aircraft to be completely empty. There is no payload and no fuel. So surely the ZFW and the GW should be exactly the same as GW = ZFW plus fuel. Here there is an extra 160kg somehow. This is messing up the aircraft weight calculations, and also at odds with simbrief, because the profile gives the empty weight as 80000, but the actual empty weight is 80161.7kg. Maybe it is including two pilots in this 80.16 GW, but the pilots should be factored in to the OEW and thus the ZFW. So if you want to simulate the weight of the pilots, the OEW and thus ZFW with no payload needs to be 80.16 and then the simbrief profile will need updating. At the moment we are always getting a 160kg discrepancy. You can see the actual ZFW and GW using Any2GSX, so you can tell that the aircraft itself is reading the ZFW incorrectly. Hope this makes sense. Thanks

In addition. Here there is a SPD Limit of 180 at EMA9 But the aircraft is then trying to accelerate afterwards to 210 at IEM82, where there is no SPD restriction (but even if there was, it would stay at 180, as 180 still satisfies MAX 210. You can also see that the (SPD)(LIM) waypoint is in the wrong place. The aircraft does not need to slow to 250 for 10000ft at all because there is a waypoint VELAG with a speed restriction of 250kts at FL123, so the aircraft will already be at 250 for 10000ft. Therefore no deceleration required. So the (SPD)(LIM) pseudo waypoint should not even be there at all. If the aircraft does need to slow to 250kts at 10000ft (because there is no waypoint with a restriction of 250kts that the aircraft will be at before it reaches 10000ft) then the (SPD)(LIM) waypoint should be at the point in the flight plan when the aircraft will begin to decelerate. This altitude will depend on the calculated econ descent speed before it needs to decelerate but generally around FL120-FL105. So the (SPD)(LIM) waypoint should be sequenced in the flight plan between the two waypoints that have a predicted altitude immediately above and below the altitude at which it will begin the deceleration. (Sorry that is quite hard to explain in words, much easier when you can speak it and point to the F-PLN page)! Thanks.

Hi Denny An update is planned for KMDT and KEGE, if you have anymore issues that needs to be resolved in the upcoming update, let me know about it.

There are still numerous issues with the F-PLN page that have been reported for a long time. The predicted speed for waypoints in cruise are still given in IAS rather than MACH. There are duplicate (T/D) pseudo waypoints. 3 way switches still have inconsistent scroll wheel behaviour. For example compare the BRK A/SKD or the LDG Light switches with the FD/FPV and CONSOLE FLOOD LT switches. For the first two if you scroll up the switch moves up, but with the last two, if you scroll up the switch moves down. It is really annoying. The level-off arrow and the banana on the ND also need work just like all the other airbus aircraft in your fleet. Clicking on the LSK to Auto Populate the ZFWCG does not work. Below is a video showing that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k8hp714E_U Many thanks for your continued work on this aircraft. I must say it hand flies very nicely, the best flight model of your aircraft by far I think in terms of hand flying!

Defiantly something is off in the flight control behaviour, not the controls. From 1.2.6

Same thing here... I went to ATC COM, MSG RECORD and selected all messengers. The COMPANY MSG at ECAM disappeared

Hello, the differing variants of the A340 should be found once you pick an aircraft and configure it, just to verify you don't have any external mods or liveries that could be affecting the aircraft. If you can, create an isolated community folder with just the A340 in it, no liveries or mods, and then launch the sim You can create a second community folder by simply renaming your current one "Community1 or OldCommunity" and then the new folder with just the A340 in it as "Community" Let me know if this helps.

I'll get this logged for the team, thank you.

Hello, In the latest update, the fence that goes around the back of Terminal 2 has gone missing. It used to be a thing (BA screenshot shows when it was there) but since latest update, it's now missing....

Copy that, hope it's on the a380! :)

IniJamir, would you check please "on your PC", if there is a heat blur exhaust effect out of the APU (MSFS 2024 premium freighter, PW and GE) and report back. Thanks in advance Chris

I did as you asked and I can confirm that it didn´t change anything. Apparently the version is now up to 1.1.10. Anyway, the liveries are still missing: For each variant there are still just the plain white and house liveries which diverts greatly from the advertised pictures. I really hope that you add them back in - asap. For that matter, in 2020 there was the yellow DHL livery available too (not the white and yellow air hong kong, a classic yellow DHL). To be fair, that is not advertised but since the premium edition is supposed too be an upgrade, I wonder why one livery would be left out. But at least the ones as marketed including FedEx and UPS who are nowadays the two most prominent operators.

Hello, I am experiencing the same issue with the iniBuilds A340 for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024. I purchased the aircraft from the MSFS 2024 Marketplace through Steam. After installation, I noticed that the two standard Passenger variants (EIS1 and EIS2) are completely missing from the aircraft selection menu. The only variants available are the VIP and Preighter versions. The Passenger variants do not appear anywhere in the list. I have already tried the following troubleshooting steps: - Completely uninstalled the aircraft from the Content Manager. - Downloaded and installed it again. - Confirmed that there are no available updates. - Restarted the simulator after reinstalling. Unfortunately, the issue remains exactly the same. Could you please confirm whether this is a known issue with the Marketplace version of the aircraft? If so, is there a workaround or an upcoming fix? If this is not expected behavior, I would appreciate any guidance on how to restore the missing Passenger variants.

@IniJamir Hi Jamir, Can the callouts on final be looked at again please, they are still not present in V1.0.8 The issue really is that there are so many great aircraft to fly in MSFS now, that I don't fly the L1011 consistently enough to be able to land it nicely on sight picture alone. I jumpo around with various different aircraft, many that sit much lower to the ground and the callouts from 100ft down really help to mentally prepare and execute the flare. If you only fly a single type its easy enough to get the muscle memory trained on sight picture alone, but as simmers who fly lots of different aircraft with different sight picture in the flare its pretty tricky. Would really like to see these added even if its a toggleable option please. Thanks for your time

MCDU stopped responding to inputs, Then the FCU. Tried controlling by hand, nothing happens. Pressed ESC and game decides to fully freeze and lock out. No mods such as GSX or anything else that could affect the systems. I Was flying on Vatsim with model matching. Issue happened around 1h 20-30minutes in the flight with no mentionable traffic around.