All Activity

Good news on the regional pricing deal. You can also verify the installed folder in your Content Manager, where the publisher name is listed alongside the version number.

Useful feedback. Creating a dedicated control profile specifically for the A380 instead of reusing twin-engine profiles avoids input conflicts with custom brake pressure code.

Greeting, Team I just finished flying A220 then switch to A380, suddenly A380 showing this: The vertical stab logo is blending with the terminal but it is gone when moving above the terminal. Also missing some gears in it. I have to reload MSFS because changing livery seems still exist. I tried with other IniBuilds Aircraft, is not happening like that, or any other aircraft. This is only happening everytime I switch from A220 to A380. But other IniBuilds Aircraft is not conflicting with A220. Please help. Cheers HaveASafeFlight!

I am also experiencing this, suddenly I was Logged Out everytime approaching Descend 😵‍💫 Cheers, HaveASafeFlight!

This is what I found from KAL A380 FCOM: So, obviously there's option for Derated Takeoff Thrust instead using ATM/FLEX or Max T/O Thrust Cheers, HaveASafeFlight!

both all 404

Greetings, Team Our lovely FMGCS have many function, also act as SUPER-COMPUTER for Pilots. But seems it misses some point. FMGCS CREATING WAYPOINT FMGCS known is able to create waypoints whenever is needed to help either targeting route or to "guard" some altitude. Directly to the FPLN Page or STORED WAYPOINT. I am flying SVO-AMS today, I can't help but notice that it having some problem, like 2 samples below: Sample 1: On FPLN Page is not able to create "Place-Bearing/Place-Bearing" Waypoint which identifies as PBX##, but whenever I tried to insert it on PILOT STORED WAYPOINTS, it goes funny 😂 I try inserting "ISENG" Waypoint which consist of SPL-020/FRO-350 which like this: but stored like this ===> it should showing the preset P-B/P-B (or in PBD, it should show the P/B/D) But, what makes it even funnier, it shown like this on FPLN Page ====> waaayyy too far from the planned waypoint 😂 Sample 2: The "Place/Distance" which shown as PD## also need correction, from Waypoint ARTIP to SPL to make ARTIP/6 or SPL/-25 which a place along the route in between, but somehow it is showing this: i put it AFTER ARTIP waypoint but somehow it placed AFTER SPL and not along the route, it also makes a different Bearing than the preset. I notice this is also happening on A350, but I forgot to tell you about this. FMGCS PROBLEM DURING DESCEND-TO-APPROACH PHASE AND AFTER-GO-AROUND-TO-RE-APPROACH PHASE Descend to Approach Phase During descend phase, FCTM said that FMGCS calculates Descend Profile AT 2.5Degrees Glide Path and with decelaration of 100feet/second on Level Flight or may less during deceleration (Rule of Thumb: 1,000 feet/10 Nm on Level Flight OR 2,000-2,500 feet/10 Nm in case of decelerating, with Speed of 10 Knots/Nm on Level Flight or around 20 kt/Nm during deceleration) ICAO Doc 4444 stating that Speed should be 250 kt below 10 000 feet, and speed 220-210 kt below 5 000 - 6 000 feet at TMA (Around 30-25 Nm from the Airport), and most of airport now are doing speed 180 kt between 12 Nm to 8 Nm and 160 kt from 8 Nm to 4 Nm. Then doing VApp until landing. From what I notice from IniBuilds (A330/A340A/A350/A380), DECEL Pseudo-Waypoint is incorrectly simulated. Previously, FCTM-NOR-SOP stating that DECEL Pseudo-Waypoint is around 10-15Nm from Runway Threshold and it may goes further back if there's a speed constraint selected either on IAF, IF, or FAF to target speed around VApp at runway (IF NO SPEED CONSTRAINT, and may way further back if there is Speed Constraint on selected waypoint) but somehow actual Airbus' FMGCS doing Landing Flaps Config AT FAF instead of doing decelerated approach which stabilized at 1,000 ft. That is why I notice ALL IniBuilds Aircraft doesn't simulate the Decel Pseudo-Waypoint at FMGCS correctly. For Example, I set speed on IAF (which PANS-ATM state around 10-15 Nm) at 180 kt, suddenly the Decel Pseudo-Waypoint moved forward towards FAF. And even worst at some High Altitude Approach (e.g LTFM which comes from 5,000 feet). See picture down below. <<=== Both Pictures showing LTFM ILS Z Runway 35R Actual Airbus FMGCS will move Decel P/W further back from IAF to compensate speed deceleration from Speed Control Constraint (250ktbelowFL100 or High Speed Descend) to GDot (which targeted by Magenta Dot) then targeting deceleration from GDot to IAF Selected Speed Constraint by Decel P/W. So I can say that this is incorrectly simulated. Missed Approach to Re-Approach Phase I notice that every time I simulates Missed Approach, the Cruise Altitude is stayed on previous Target Cruise Altitude (FL350/FL390 or whatever previous Cruise Flight Phase selected). If I selected any Altitude, suddenly the speed goes >300 knots AFTER I re-direct to some waypoints and the rest of calculation of Magenta Dot, and Decel P/W IS GONE. But some cases, the Magenta Dot and Decel P/W is there but the FMGCS doesn't comply with that restriction and maintaining speed >300 knot even though I already preset 250/FL100 (or 220/FL050) and selected target speed or ATC-Managed Speed. This also happening on A330/A340/A350, not specific on A380 Only. Also, during the re-approach, the VSD on A350/A380 are showing like this ==> Imagine if you are flying RNAV/RNP Approach with this 😂 FMGCS Keyboard Function if I want to insert "-" or "+" on CDU using Keyboard Function, this can not be inserted on CDU to make anything. But it is normal if I am using the CDU Keyboard. If you guys can make corrections about this on any update, that would be great. Thank you very much. Cheers. HaveASafeFlight!

The FBW is a great product however I find the Inbuilds A380 is also another higher level. Being a new release, we all expect bugs however I know that inbuilds are very fast with their updates which I experienced with the A350. The autosave has been a problem with even the A350 but I am confident that all will be fixed.

Another update..was able to complete a full flight from start to finish as long as I do not touch the charts option on the EFB. Was a wonderful experience now that I was able to get it in the air !

Yeah I’ve had a similar experience although did make it off out of Sydney (YSSY) for Dubai (OMDB), only 513 tonne but it gave me a flex of 74 and boy oh boy did we use some runway, I’ve never come that close to the end of a runway ever before, it did feel off.

Very true, the RR Dart sounds on the YS-11 and Fokker F-27 are no where close to being correct, I remember hearing RR Darts on Piedmont YS-11's Fairchild-Hiller FH-227B's and Fairchild F-27's, it was a very loud high pitched scream, also the Fokker F-27 sits/taxis with the wrong stance, nose gear should be more compressed, F-27 should sit/taxi with a slight nose down attitude.

The F-27 parked/taxing stance is very wrong, the nose gear should be more compressed, the aircraft should sit and taxi with a slight nose down attitude, also the registration on the KLM livery is backwards on the right side, and the engine sounds are wrong, the RR Darts have a loud high pitched scream, right now the F-27 & YS-11 sound like Beechcraft engines.

Hello! I recently purchased a Moza MCDU and I cannot get the buttons or screen to work with the default A320neo in MSFS 2024. It just says “Waiting for game data.” Can you kindly confirm if it is supported? Thank you!

Update for this. FYI I only fly in VR. Thought I might have got it right. Spawned in at a gate at you Dubai v1 (still can't see an update for this airport on the Marketplace). Started the flight. Got to FL100. Suddenly all the lights and switches lit up. Some were floating mid air. Unflyable obviously. 2D was unaffected. Quit the flight restarted at the same airport with the same flightplan. WASM crash after clicking Ready to fly.

Hi Team, I am hoping to get some help/clarity here. I routinely fly long hauls, and have done upwards of 16 hours in the a350. However, ever since I purchased the a380, I have not been able to complete a single long haul flight. The simulator will CTD every time after a few hours of flying. I would like to figure out whats happening but I do not know where to start. Any help is appreciated. The only clue I have so far is that on both occasions, the CTD happened around the same area (Eastern Europe)

Needing to do this begs the question: Why couldn't thin initial startup be scripted somehow? How many support questions and "angry" customers would you avoid by just scripting this procedure so that it can't go wrong. Eliminate the variables.

Didn't they say they were going to release the 350v1 update? Why hasn't it come yet?

Downloaded. Deleted the WASM folder between each try. So when it says load on any runway you are not supposed to hit "Ready to fly"? Just let it sit there for X minutes and then exit to menu without clicking "Ready to fly"?

Just a heads up: You don't need to manually edit a screenshot to hide your Simbrief User ID. Just use the Streamer Mode option right above it, that will hide it.

Which is my suspicion why the INI A380 is missing the option. It is most likely that they had access to an Emirates A380. They have at least one technical consultant on the team that is an Emirates A380 instructor. And so they modeled it without it, even though all other airlines have it.

Just to make a correction to the statement I made above , there is still a p/b button for the Probe Heat but it requires in normal circumstances no manual activation as its automatic. Just saw it this morning. For some reason I had in my mind a missing switch but must have been thinking about another aircraft.

Was this supposed to be LAND3 Single only?

You do know that it makes absolutely no difference to performance whether you stream or download? Packages are only downloaded if they are needed. For example if you fly LHR to DXB with both airports being streamed they will only get downloaded once you reach a certain distance from it. Same with aircraft. What you fly is downloaded and the most important packages remain locally while the rest is streamed in as needed. Only on very slow internet connections would you likely experience stuff loading in slower. But reduced perfomance overall? No.

Does it also not respond to you fiddling with its brightness knob? I did that and it came back.

same here, Not a single jetway is working. Everywhere I see the message “Error deploying ‘Lower Jetway 1 to left door 1’: rotation invalid.” The same thing is happening with Jetways 2 and 3. Very annoying! Yes, and this happening repeatedly! And it doesn't matter which plane I take.