All Activity

Hello, To be honest, I didn't look for it, so I don't know if the APU exhaust effect is there. The flight was fine - no issues. However, the enroute map still hasn't been completely fixed. The only map that displays is the Standard Map, and the route course is not displayed on it. Just the aircraft icon. Regards, Scott

Hi everyone, I've been trying to fly to Cam Ranh for 9 times now, but this crash won't let me. It's very similar to a WASM crash, but the screen with inibuilds functions, which is located to the left of the pfd, is working for me. The other screens don't have that orange screen, just the last thing they were displaying. The game isn't paused, I have the time-stopping feature disabled before descent, but at some point the cabin stops responding to my actions without any hint of a WASM problem. Please help, I'd be very grateful.

This issue only occurs in MSFS 2020. There are no problems in MSFS 2024. This information might be useful for the team.

Aircraft: A350-900 Simulator: FS2024 Navdata Method: NAVIGRAPH WASM Error: WASM: Error during HUD_gauge_update execution. Error code : 0xc000001d WASM: Module vfs://inibuilds-aircraft-a350/SimObjects/Airplanes/A350/attachments/inibuilds/Function_Interior_A350/panel/inibuilds-A350.wasm Gauge: EFIS Specs: 7800X3D, RTX 5070TI, 64gb DDR5 RAM Autosave File: N/A On the ground, while manually inserting a fix.

Hello iniBuilds Team, I am writing to respectfully report a persistent issue concerning the 3D model of the Captain's seat within the iniBuilds A350, specifically with the default cabin configuration installed via iniManager. It appears that the Captain's seat is currently misaligned. Its rendering places it at an excessively high elevation and too far back within the cockpit. In contrast, the First Officer's seat on the right side seems to be rendered with accurate and realistic positioning. This discrepancy significantly detracts from the overall immersion, as such a distorted seating arrangement would be highly improbable for a real pilot. Given that this affects the physical 3D object of the seat rather than merely the camera perspective, user-side adjustments are unfortunately not an effective solution. Would it be possible for your team to investigate this coordinate issue and implement a permanent correction for the Captain's seat alignment in an upcoming official aircraft update? Thank you for your commendable efforts on the A350; I eagerly anticipate a resolution. Best regards,

Do you see the heat blur exhaust effect out of the APU?

This issue presents during manual flight only. It seems like an 'argueementation system' keeps generate counter forces against stick input to stop keep the wing steady at any bank angle when release the stick. This 'system' is too sensitive and agressive, as a result the manual flight roll behavior is very strange. You need to adjust the sensitivity of the 'argueementation system' and to reduce the force applied.

This issue presents during manual flight only. It seems like an 'argueementation system' keeps generate counter forces against stick input to stop keep the wing steady at any bank angle when release the stick. This 'system' is too sensitive and agressive, as a result the manual flight roll behavior is very strange. You need to adjust the sensitivity of the 'argueementation system' and to reduce the force applied.

Experiencing exactly this; she feels very 'light' while on the take off roll.

Can confirm; clickspots on the overhead panel are a pain, after installing SU5.

I was well into my flight. I switched from Nav to VOR. As soon as I touched the VOR tuning knob, I got a CTD. This is build 1.0.10

Plane spawns in the air before falling to the ground and wobbling around for 20 seconds. At take off speed only the front wheels lift making it un flyable? Iv’e just purchased a plane which i can’t even fly

When using BeyondATC, I get a taxi clearance (from gate 61L to rwy 04) via taxiway H with a lot of other - incorrect - designators (P, N and L). At least in the case of ‘P’, I can confirm this using Little Nav Map: A very short section of taxiway H is labelled P and BeyondATC is picking that up. I suppose that this is also the case for the other designators. Could you please verify this?

Greetings! I am happy to report that update v1.0.10 fixed - at least for me - all of the problems with the GE variant I had posted about. I installed the update and then loaded the aircraft. Everything was as it should be. I will take it on a flight this evening. Thanks to everyone who helped with this! Regards, Scott

Hello, is there any update to this? It's a 10 minute fix with a 30 min push to servers, yet here we are, 2 months later and still no fix....

Hello iniBuilds team, I am a regular customer on the iniStore (I own several of your sceneries). I wanted to share some feedback on the F406 Caravan II after testing it, including the latest update. 1. Floodlight not working The floodlight (the main overhead light in the cabin) does not seem to function at all. There is no switch or control that turns it on or off. This is quite disappointing because the aircraft manual clearly mentions a floodlight, and even older add-ons like the Titan 404 have a working one. At night, this really hurts immersion and makes the cabin almost unusable in dark conditions. 2. Propeller levers too sensitive The propeller levers are extremely sensitive in the upper part of their range. Even when using the mouse for precise control, small movements cause very large changes in RPM. This makes fine adjustments difficult, especially during cruise or when trying to set precise power settings. 3. Overall systems depth (especially engine) I also own the 414, 850 and M500. Compared to these, the systems depth on the F406 feels noticeably lighter. In particular, the engine simulation (ITT behavior during start and in flight) seems quite simplified and forgiving. It doesn’t deliver the same level of realism I was hoping for on a twin PT6 aircraft. The aircraft looks good visually and has nice mission features, but on the technical side (lighting, prop control feel, and engine thermodynamics) it currently feels unfinished or lacking compared to what one would expect at this price point. I’m posting this in the hope that these points can be looked at in a future update. If the team needs more details, screenshots, or specific conditions where the issues appear, I’m happy to provide them. Thank you for your work on the F406.

Yeah cant click anything on the overheard.. takes forever to find the super small clickspot for the button. Unflyable :( Never had this issue with another aircraft. Only the ini a300

I don't know how this passed testing, but on the current patch, the L1011 wildly changes the EPR on TM/VNAV climb and the aircraft will literally go into a 1000ft or greater descent during VNAV climb to catch the speed it's trying to climb at. Not only that, once the aircraft is level in cruise, it descends AND climbs anywhere from 500 to 1000 feet as it tries to maintain speed (I guess??). It literally cannot maintain level flight. Guys, this is bad. The TM mode is completely unusable.

I’ve also noticed that EFOB at destination increases as the CI is increased. Flight time does reduce, but so does the fuel usage, which is not the way it should be.

Same. It's been like this since the beginning. Incredible that no one picked up on this sooner.

Thanks Mike. Much appreciated. I trust this is for the -500 version.

Yep, I too have this same issue. Very frustrating, and therefore now unflyable. Keith

I made a forum post on this last year and it was already fixed. It is correct to the a340's synthetic voice style. 1. Why are we using AI... 2. It is already fixed, it isn't like the RA callouts that were originally in the aircraft that were ripped from the a350/ airbus gpws callouts off of youtube

Hi There, Its been a month.

Since aerosoft and LVFR has implemented taxi camera on their aircraft using different approaches, is inibuilds trying any workaround to implement taxi cameras as well?