All Activity

Hi Inibiuilds, some impressions from yesterday update: While the performance seems highly improved (thanks for that) unfortunately the autopilot now is broken. In the classic veriant (no GPS activated) following a VOR Radial inbound or outbound in track mode does not longer work. After a while the plane will drift away from the course and eventually Track mode will disengage. Steps to reproduce: My example flight was RCKH DCT GID DCT SJE DCT RORS Can you have a look at this?

Hello! Was wondering if there's any chance there may be some support for the beautiful new terminal at Pittsburgh International. No sim since the FSX/Xplane days has ever rendered KPIT properly, and I was wondering if there was any chance inibuilds would be doing it in the future. The modeling on the KORD terminal is second to none, and with PIT having such a nice one now, was hoping simmers would be able to fly out of the airport without default scenery. I know it doesn't have the popularity that KORD or OMDB might have, but still an airport in the US that supports many connections! Thanks!

Yeah, JFK was disabled. I suspect it might have to do with the scenery indexes? So I cleared those out and fresh-installed the scenery. I'll let you know if I experience it again...

Would love for this to happen, come on MS/Asobo and iniBuilds-the A330 got some bug fixes in Sim Update 6 though still no sign of an enhancement package/rework coming in a sim update.

It works on my installation, but only if I “launch” the database on each launch of the sim. This is not OK, and should start automatically when the terrain function is selected in the airplane. It works like that on any expensive addon airplane. Regards, Eric

Post V1.0.4, problem persists on the tablet…. Reinstalled the airplane when updating to the latest, but still the same….

I was pretty sure that failures weren't modeled. Testing them is a step in the inibuilds checklist through. Since it seems there's no button to press to actually perform said test, apparently you just skip over said item. (Which means it likely should be removed from the checklist.)

Hi, Not yet no, but there definitely will be. Thanks!

initial post HierIstKlaus [A220], OP — 09/07/2026 00:47I'd like to provide some honest feedback regarding the current state of the A350 in MSFS 2024. While the aircraft has a lot of potential and many aspects got better after updates, there are still several areas that significantly impact realism and immersion. Sounds Power-up sounds are still inconsistent. When only the batteries are switched on, there is just a strange ventilation/humming noise instead of the proper ventilation fans Cockpit shutdown sounds are still too abrupt. The relay clicking sounds abrupt and not how it should be (https://youtu.be/CMeAvK4lyO0?si=JhcyZfzZz_A7_u7J&t=52) Opening or closing any aircraft door triggers cockpit sounds Regardless of which door is operated, audio always plays in the cockpit. The door opening is just a strange clicking noise which doesn't even fit a door opening sound. The same happens when closing the doors. but at least with a fitting sound. Slat movement sounds are inconsistent in volume. They begin quietly and then suddenly become much louder during the same movement. The sound level should remain more consistent throughout the extension/retraction. Engine start sounds do not match the engine parameters. The audio timing does not correspond to the N3 acceleration, fuel injection, or ignition sequence. This appears to be a consequence of the current engine model rather than just the sound recordings themselves. "Autobrake Off" This is a never ending story I guess. What's so hard to deactivate the chime and just play the callout??? Systems The OANS map takes long to load. During loading it causes noticeable stuttering, the image quality is poor, and overall performance suffers. The implementation by FlyByWire demonstrates that this can be done much more efficiently. The simulator experiences significant lag whenever VNAV and fuel predictions are recalculated after modifying the flight plan. Route changes should not have such a noticeable impact on overall simulator performance. Engine / APU Simulation The APU EGT behaviour during cooldown is unrealistic. The temperature drops below 150°C, which does not reflect the behaviour of the real aircraft. (https://youtu.be/oYj4zAG8YVQ?si=wwFP6IW5cJU2y7Im) N3 accelerates far too quickly during engine start. It rises to around 20% almost immediately instead of increasing more progressively. The overall engine start sequence is too fast. The startup lacks the gradual progression seen on the real Trent XWB. (full engine start https://youtu.be/IsYx7vw4dHE?si=j7cmVqCGEosOBigR&t=784) Fuel injection, ignition, and the corresponding engine sounds are not synchronized. As said, the visual engine indications and the audio do not match each other, making the startup sequence feel wrong. Overall, I believe the aircraft has a strong foundation, but these issues noticeably reduce immersion, especially for users who are familiar with Airbus procedures and engine behaviour. I hope these areas can receive further attention in future updates. These are not even all issues I've noticed, but unfortunately many systems are just programmed like: if that happens -> do that, and that's not always how it works. YouTube Dennis Vijverberg, Brakes Released Airbus A350 shutdown and startup with external power. YouTube Dennis Vijverberg, Brakes Released Airbus A350-1000 “into the darkness” APU shutdown on battery ECAM YouTube Just Pilots French Bee Airbus A350-900 Cockpit Paris🇫🇷 to San Francisco...

Is there an official communication about what this v2 involve?

Hi, You are correct. We don't have maintenance or service based failures on the aircraft, so as long as you can see that the value on the gauge is not reading 0, you should be good to go. Hope this helps. Thanks!

Hi, I will forward this thread to Synaptic for further review. While I cannot provide a timeline for their response, hopefully this is something they can investigate and address. Thanks!

I use the one from the Synaptic website and it has the same issue since the latest update.

I'm aware of that. In previous posts Kyle has said that the Ini team sends these reports to them. If Synaptic was not going to use this forum for support, they would not have Ini host it on their forums or would have a post saying there is no tech support here.

Going through the pre-start checklists for the L-1011, there's points where you're supposed to test oil quantity, oil temperature and N1 on the flight engineer's panel. Except I can't find any switch or button to test them, and the manual is no help. The EFB "look" button doesn't seem to go to anything. Is it simply something currently not modeled, or am I missing something obvious? Thanks.

Just a follow up everyone, Can confirm this has been logged by the team and we're actively investigating the issue. Hoping for a fix soon! Thank you!

Hi, I'm honestly stumped, as now I am also having the same issue on my end after updating to SU6. I will speak to the team for further clarification. Thanks!

Hmmm...still seeing the pink textures. I've also performed a clean install of MSFS2024. Only thing loaded is Navigraph, PMDG 737 and iniBuilds KDFW airport. I reordered it to near the top at this point. Nothing seems to be working.

Hi, Yes, that would be correct. If moving it up one or two slots doesn’t resolve the issue, try moving it closer to the top of your reorder list. Thanks!

Correct! I edited the post after realizing it had been released publicly. Great to hear that a fresh install worked! Thanks for your feedback!

Hi André, We’re happy to have passionate users like you taking the time to provide such detailed suggestions. Thank you for your continued feedback! I’ll make sure to take note of your suggestions and pass them along to the team for future evaluation. Thank you!

Hi everyone, Thanks for your patience on this matter. I can confirm that this has been logged on our end, and I’ll push for an immediate fix based on your requests. Thanks for taking the time to share your suggestions and feedback. We really appreciate it! Thanks!

Hi, The multi-jetway tool should work with some third-party aircraft, especially those that have specific code alignment and door layout data, which the 777 does. This would explain why it “kind of” works when you pull forward past the parking spot markers. If you were to test this with any of the iniBuilds widebody aircraft, you should see the aircraft parked correctly at the designated parking stand markings. Hope this helps! Thanks!

Hi ini, is there any update on this? I'd love to buy the scenery but can't do that if you are unwilling to fix it. I mean I could buy it and then use the scenery editor to fix it myself. But that would be a rather bad deal for me. Please fix the vegetation, it was reported broken 3 months ago. Thank you!

I think the reason you being sent to the Discord is because this is a Synaptic issue. Not an Inibuilds direct issue. You have to remember Synaptic is the dev team with Inibuilds involvement.