All Activity

On 1.2.8 you can hear both the slats and the flaps in the cockpit

Something I wondered about.. Concerning this GPS/NAV issue, how can it be that this was never noticed during development? Do you guys no actual hands-on testing on new features? I would think that the first thing I would test when removing a GPS unit would be to test the functionality that was affected by removing the functionality of the GPS, like checking how I could set a NAV frequency to land on a runway or something without the GPS. I wonder how your testing process works if this was missed. And if it was actually identified during testing (as it should have been), how can it be that this was then declared a non-essential issue and the change of removing the GPS was implemented?

Has anyone been able to fly an SLS approach at any airport? I have the impression that this feature is not implemented?

Would be really nice to have these implimented finally. It also seems a lot of other very useful CPDLC options are greyed out. Is this possible to fix?

I am also getting the same behavior with time compression on xbox

Hi, I take the opportunity to ask if DISPATCH MESSAGES will be implemented. Many failure messages in real life are dispatch messages, that at the moment are not implemented in the Inibuilds one. Thanks.

Reduced Texture Pack 1.0.1 is installed

Cargo holds and doors are broken with latest low res texture pack in V1.0.7 in EA engine variant

Weight band Flown level Aircraft OFP Δ 460–485 t FL361–371 11.7 t/h 14.1 t/h −15.7% 440–460 t FL381 10.5 t/h 12.9 t/h −16.7% 420–440 t FL381 9.9 t/h 11.9 t/h −15.2% 400–420 t FL381 9.9 t/h 11.2 t/h −10.0% 380–400 t FL381 9.9 t/h 10.6 t/h −4.8% 363–380 t FL381 10.0 t/h 9.9 t/h +0.3%

Latest SU7.2B, A388 v1.0.7a OFP FMS prediction Actual Δ vs OFP Off-blocks / takeoff (UTC) 16:10 / 16:25 – 16:13 / 16:23 +3 / −2 min Touchdown / on-blocks (UTC) 05:25 / 05:33 ETA 05:23 (after TOC), 05:27 (near TOD) 05:23 / 05:29 −2 / −4 min Time from takeoff to touchdown 12:59:54 13:00 (preflight) 12:59:53 0 TOW / ZFW 497.3 / 325.9 t – 497.3 / 325.9 t 0 Ramp fuel 172.4 t – 172.4 t 0 Taxi out 1.09 t – 1.01 t −0.08 t Fuel to TOC 11.4 t in 0:26 – 10.3 t in 0:23 −1.1 t (−9.5%) Fuel to TOD 153.7 t at 12:32 – 137.1 t at 12:34 −16.6 t (−10.8%) Trip burn 155.4 t 142.9 t (preflight) 139.6 t −15.8 t (−10.2%) Landing fuel (EFOB) 15.9 t 28.5 t preflight; 28.6 t (dipping to 26.2 t) after TOC; 31.6 t near TOD 31.7 t +15.8 t

Please note that the default GSX profile allows multiple types of cargo that are unsuitable for the A380 to be selected. While AKH ULDs do fit, they are not usually used on A380 flights. Other pallets and ULDs are too large for the hold, but still show.

Hi, I have noticed that the A388 did not perform a step from FL381 to FL400 automatically. Is it possible that it only automatically executes 1000ft steps? What if the alt selector is set to 100ft increments?

Will v1.0.8 fix these issues?

I wanted to add to this.. I noticed this problem today and stumbled across this thread. It appears that the upper deck is working normally. The lower deck is where the problem persists. The lower deck has the lights swapped. So, when the seatbelt sign comes on in the cockpit, the mobile lamp illuminates in the lower deck cabin and when the mobile sign is turned on in the cockpit, the seatbelt sign illuminates in the lower deck of the cabin. Hopefully this helps. Thanks,

Hi, any updates on this?

Is this going to be addressed?

That's a really interesting observation! It's surprising how a small difference in Mach number can become difficult to achieve at cruising altitude, even when the engines still have some thrust available. Aircraft performance at FL410 is definitely worth exploring.

Had complained about the EA variant previously but Inibuilds have not addressed this. No strong winds or turbulence. Really frustrating to fly this aircraft. At the point of giving up and revert to the FBW A380 which flies much better. Also another issue I have complained of previously about this variant is that it is unable to capture the localiser and glideslope along the runway extended centreline. These 2 issues need to be addressed urgently!!! See my saved flight attached B-OERK-15R-----OTHH-34R.bin

I'm going to take the opposite stance. I have been a real-world airline pilot for over 27 years and, at least at my airline, I have not seen widows with all these marks and scuffs, especially the windshield wiper scuffs, like I am seeing on many of the MSFS airliners available today. I applaud the effort developers make to create more detail on their airplanes, but sometimes those details don't quite match real life. We currently have over 480 airframes in the fleet that I am on alone and none of the ones I have flown have windows that look like the one in the video at the top of this thread.

agreed A350-1000 and -900 still have the same issue

Thanks Mario. Will test this on my end and report back!

Thanks for your inquiry. I'll forward this to the team for further clarification. Appreciate your patience 🙂

For everyone having this issue, please disable/re-enable the aircraft. If you have the aircraft installed, please uninstall and re-install. Please let me know if this helps. Thanks!