All Activity

I might be having this issue as well, though I've never seen it in person. Im having issues where on long haul flights my TOD is pushed back so much and i lose so much fuel. At the photo icon was when I last checked on my flight and everything was looking good, TOD time was correct, was predicted to be landing with 8.6 tonnes of fuel left. In fact, my tod time was actually earlier than the predicted time upon departure. But when I came back to my TOD it had been pushed back by 3 HOURS, and dest efob had dropped down to 1.4 tonnes! A member of the community pointed out that my issue could be related to this Thread. Perhaps it may have happened when i was flying over the north pole / arctic? Route: OTHH/34R TULU3E TULUB B457 NARMI N697 PASIT T503 OVANO L768 SOKAN DCT FIRAS DCT NISAP UM861 BUK UL621 ODERO L746 LUGEB DCT DIRAL DCT LAPKA DCT ETEPA DCT KEKED DCT KELEL DCT SUDOL DCT ADVAB DCT KOLOB DCT SABAK DCT ULMUG DCT ISVIG DCT 67N010W DCT 70N020W DCT 72N040W DCT 72N060W DCT NADMA DCT 7030N07000W DCT 68N080W DCT 6330N09000W DCT YEK DCT 56N100W DCT DURUR DCT BIL DCT TCH DCT WINEN Q73 HAKMN ANJLL4 KLAX/CRCUS.I24R Plane: Qatar Airways A350-1000 Specs: GPU: 9070XT CPU: 9800X3D RAM: 64GB DDR5 My specs are quite good and they pointed out it could be performance related. But i doubt thats the case.

I do not yet have A350 but thought I’d share the same experience I recently had with FlightFx Citation X. Hitting Esc key and going right back to the flight restored it.

Hey guys, Now flown two flights with 1.0.7 and the aircraft seems to be unable to capture the glideslope properly now. Pushing the ILS button while the aircraft is physically below GS now shows GS captured immediately (rather than armed/captured), and the aircraft starts descending before the GS diamond is centered - meaning that it's descending below path for the entire approach. Disengaging ILS and recapturing results in the same issue. This wasn't an issue pre-update although I do remember that the aircraft used to climb to capture GS before 1.0.7 (which was marked as fixed), so I'm thinking it could possibly be a logic issue with that fix? That is obviously unless I'm missing something/doing something wrong. I usually capture LOC in LOC mode before arming G/S through the ILS mode. Not sure what's going on. If needed for the team, I can record a video on my next flight to demonstrate the issue. Thank you!

Ok, I'll give it a shot. How do you do it? Just change the source in the EFB? I don't want to uninstall Navigraph AIRACs in general...

Any update on this?

Frankly I get tired of the constant begging for yet another European airport when there are other massive areas of the globe that have seen far less attention, most notably, South America.

Thanks! All good now with the LVARs.

Again to add an update, at least to the STAR WASM crash; Been flying quite a lot recently on default MSFS Airacs, some shorter hauls, some longer hauls. Adding STAR and changing them has not been an issue after uninstalling Navigraph Airacs. While not a fix, it seems to be a temporary solution. For those that still struggles and want to fly this aircraft, I suggest trying this.

Hi, if you could please copy and paste all of this in the link here as this is where our team directly pulls and ingests WASMs. Thank you https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/35419-inibuilds-a340-master-wasm-crash-thread-v1012/

Try these: L:OVH_CPT_WIPER and L:OVH_FO_WIPER 0 = OFF, 1 = SLOW, 2 = FAST I dont have Axis and Ohs but checked via SPAD and both seem to be working. Yes they do work. The DEACT sticker is referring to the rain repellent switches, not the wipers themselves. Their clickspot however is currently affected by a platform level bug since SU5 beta that incorrectly scales the clickspots of certain types of XML interactions. The same was reported on A310 and taken by Asobo as a sim bug - basically the click spot boundaries have become too small / scale incorrectly with zoom levels, resolutions etc. In these instances the clickspot will always be exactly at the center of the switch. Move closer or zoom in if you're having troubles for the time being. You can confirm this by enabling Developer Mode > Tools > Behaviours > Debug > Interactions. You'll note that the interaction shows, and works as intended but the hitbox seemingly de-scales wrongly when the debug is disabled.

EGCC to LPPT, Sayintentions. Initial cruise at FL230, levelled off then requested and climbed to FL400. Whilst in the climb to FL400 I set up my arrival XANAX2A ILS 02 via PESEX and added a couple of range rings over LPPT and LIS VOR. As soon as I levelled off at FL400, WASM crash. Hadn't clicked or changed anything, I think the FMA changed (from CLB to CRZ?) but I wasn't paying all that much attention to be honest! Aircraft: A340 EIS 1 Passenger Simulator: FS2024 Version: Marketplace Navdata Method: Navigraph OFP: Included in case it helps WASM Error: WASM: Error during FMGS_gauge_update execution. Error code : 0xc0000005 WASM: Module vfs://inibuilds-aircraft-a340/SimObjects/Airplanes/inibuilds-a340/attachments/inibuilds/Function_A343_Interior/panel/inibuilds-A340.wasm is now dirty Specs: i7-14700kf, RTX 4070 super 12GB, 32GB DDR5 5600MT/s Autosave File: Attached EGCCLPPT_PDF_1782041608.c15cf473.pdf 1782045047.bin

A lot of time has past since this Question came up and there still is no answer if and when the A350 will be available in career mode. There ist no statement at all? I realy would have expected more of an official forum. Regards

A330 getting wasm crash when selecting approach mid flight. Amazing after a 6 hour flight, and its with us for numerous months now. Does inibuilds working on a fix for that?

Are you sure you assinged a key to aileron axis? Like A/D if you are using keyboard

Hi KevinH ... easy solution 😃 Assign a key on your stick or keyboard to the function "Quick Preflight" . One Keypress, and the covers are gone 😄 Chris

Hi Guys, what about a Taxi Camera for the A350 Aerosoft shows with their A340-600 that it is possible, and its working quite good, making precise taxiiing a little bit easier 😃 Chris

Hello, I noticed that VHHH is discounted on the Marketplace, but not included in the bundle. If I purchase VHHH at the discounted price, can I request an extra city token when transferring the order?

Please add the Japan Airlines and Lufthansa liveries to the A35k as they are only included in the - 900 variant. Both Japan and Lufthansa now have A35Ks. Thank you for your hard work and hope to see this soon!

Hello ini team, first off I just want to say THANK YOU in advance and I'm surprised there hasn't be a thread made about this yet. Bizjets hold a very special place in my heart. I've been a ramp supervisor at one of the busiest FBO's in Los Angeles and have the pleasure to work with them daily. Been working the line going on 16 years now. I've been simming for even longer. Every day I'd always say to myself "I wish we can get a good Global or long range biz jet in our sims" and it looks like this dream is becoming a reality thanks to you all. With the amazing track record you've built for yourselves I expect this to be incredible. From what I've been seeing the community is going nuts over this. I hope to see this soon and thank you all once again! P.S. I have a full Global 6000 Aircraft Manual that was gifted to me by a fellow colleague. I'd be more than happy to help if you need anything.

Hi, There should be a fix coming for this in 1.0.8. When that releases let us know if you still see this issue occurring. Thank you!

Just asking if this will ever happen as Domestic is a huge part of Brisbane for obvious reasons, Australia's domestic is truly massive, although of course we can't compare it to the busiest Sydney to Melbourne route.

Imo you are just sounding a bit like AI at the moment (nor do we need the different fonts) to try and drive inibuilds to make this. However as I already said in my opinion they wouldn't go for it for the reasons I have already said. Aerosoft's frankfurt is already good. As well as for terminal 3, they will probably make it up to spec as the rest of their rendition of the airport when they are able to. The standard sim update should be more than enough for the time being

I don't believe so, it happens on most if not all flights I operate.

MORA.

I am experiencing a consistent issue in both the default Microsoft Flight Simulator A320neo and the FlyByWire A32NX. Whenever I set up a flight and select an RNAV (GNSS) approach in the MCDU, the aircraft still behaves as if an ILS approach is active. Problem description: In RAD NAV, an ILS frequency is always present, even on cold & dark start. If I try to delete or change this frequency, it either returns automatically or gives a format error. After loading a route and powering the aircraft, the ILS frequency is always auto-tuned regardless of airport or runway. Even at airports or runways without ILS, the system still shows or uses an ILS frequency from another airport or previous state. Flight behavior issue: When I select an RNAV approach in the MCDU, the Flight Mode Annunciator never shows FINAL APP. Instead, when pressing APPR, the aircraft always enters ILS logic: LOC (armed and captured) G/S (armed and captured) There is no indication of RNAV vertical guidance at any point. What I expected: For RNAV approaches, I expect FINAL APP mode instead of LOC/G/S. ILS frequencies should not affect RNAV approach logic. RAD NAV should not remain “locked” to an ILS frequency across flights. What I have already tested: Happens in both default A320neo and FlyByWire A32NX Happens on cold & dark starts Happens at multiple airports and different routes Happens even when selecting RNAV-only approaches Summary: It seems like the aircraft is permanently defaulting to ILS approach logic and auto-tuning ILS frequencies regardless of selected RNAV procedures. I am unsure whether this is: a nav data issue, a simulator assistance setting conflict, or an avionics state persistence bug. Any guidance or fix would be appreciated. Thank you.