All Activity

The brake fan has absolutely no effect and you don´t hear it outside:

Yeah, no idea why Airbus dropped the dot. I know they try and maintain commonality and that's certainly true when comparing say A330 with A340 but with the A350, you have think of it as a next gen, evolutionary step change, so not everything 100% correlates to the "older" aircraft families. Another nuance, there is no Probe Heat p/b any longer. Instead it's fully integrated into the systems so it's switched on as soon as an engine is running. OK, saving of a switch in the cockpit and related wiring is potentially a cost saving for Airbus and another simplification that pilots dont have to worry about. With the dot not showing on the FCU, that's a different story.🤔 Hopefully an Airbus avionics engineer can explain why they elected to stop displaying the dot?😉

The Ground Power Unit (GPU) can still be requested and connected while the aircraft is in flight. When airborne, the EFB/ground services menu still allows the ground power service to be activated. After activation, the GPU vehicles appear next to the aircraft in mid-air and the external power can apparently be connected/used. This should normally be inhibited when the aircraft is not on the ground.

I don't know if you were told, but there's also the body gear steering, which isn't animated.

Yes I am. Should I try again without AFPS active?

Okay, the ground spoilers not being able to be deployed after the aircraft loads and before taking off I suspect might be a result of the aircraft computers being in Flight Mode when the aircraft loads on the ground and hasn't taken off yet, not Ground Mode. If upon starting up the aircraft it's supposed to be in Flight Mode then that's fine, but if not, is there any absolute way to tell which fight mode the aircraft is in?

My personal opinion - I find it bizarre that you decided to release the scenery with this known behavior. It's one thing to say "we only support multi-jetways on Ini aircraft" ... that's your right, if you want to try and push people to buy your planes. Even then, the multi-jetway FAQ page on this forum promises it could work with other vendor's present and future aircraft, but hey... But that even the MSFS stock, single-jetway behavior is broken for all non-ini planes is just wrong. So if I arrive in an iFly 73M, or a PMDG 773, both realistic planes for this airport and neither available in your catalog, then I don't even deserve a stock MSFS jetty? To me this should be clearly disclosed in the product page. Please, please: either make 50% of the gates behave the "old way" (no multi-jetty code) or provide a config switch / swappable BGLs so the user can choose which version to load. The current situation stinks of MS trying to force people to use Internet Explorer ... if you know what I mean. For the rest, congrats on a fantastic airport - it is really beautifully modelled. DWC next?

I recently purchased the inibuilds a380 and new version of dubai omdb airport v2 from inibuilds. When I load up the plane at, the mult-jetway tool in the EFB says that "No Jetways Detected" and I cannot connect the jetways to the plane. Additionally, I tried to manually connect a jetway through the EFB, and that did not work. I then tried in GSX and that did not work either. I've tried at gates A4 and A6 and this does not work.

In the A380 When I load a "new save" the aircraft reconfigures and goes into a steep climb passing the set altitude. I have turned off the Autopilot clicked everything and it still refuses to fly at set altitude. A fantastic aircraft to date.

I am a streamer

My experience was quite the opposite; VHHH Airport was actually located on the beach, only a few dozen feet above the ground.

I have noticed this when switching views - from external to internal for example, they only stay on for a couple of seconds though.

Ive met the similar problem

i have to go in to dev mode to work around this bug debug/debug model LODs then check enable force active LODs others have also reported it on discord

Yes ofc take your time.

Neither do I, are you having the same problem?

I dont understand this download vs stream thing, I got it on the store in-sim and it downloaded?

a workaround for this is just to move the FO's seat forward for them ;)

Nope, uninstalled, confirmed streaming in the marketplace - load aircraft, align IRS, started APU, the SD showed the APU page with the flap open but then reverted to the Door page. Loaded Simbrief flightplan, configured FMC, went to check another page and the same pump turned off. EDIT: Once the engines are started I get the message on the E/WD and an aural indicator, checking the overhead, the pump is off. If I click on the CLEAR button that is highlighted on the SD controls, then the pump turns back on and the message clears.

When are you going to correct the bugs reported and publish an update ?? It's always taking Inibuilds forever to correct very basic issues! Very annoying!

Okay, not a key or control issue - ground spoilers deploy just fine on your A330 - but they also don't on the FBW A380 either - which makes it a A380 control logic trap I'm stuck in. Load the plane on the runway with engines running, then attempt to extend the spoilers control fully results in the spoilers being limited to what's clearly the in-flight limit. So, is the plane's computer simply in a control mode that doesn't allow ground spoilers (or is the parking brake being set the entire problem), including manually? (Perhaps the computer is simply in Flight Mode instead of Ground Mode? That would explain everything, but how do you tell what mode the computer is in?)

Why do people feel the engine sounds from right beside the engine in the cabin of the fuselage sound the same as they do in the cockpit?

Hello Inibuilds Team, I’m writing this because I think that an iniBuilds rendition of the Toronto-Pearson International Aiport (CYYZ) would be an absolutely awesome thing to have for the sim. I know FlyTampa already made one, but unfortunately, it isn’t available on the Marketplace, which leaves Xbox players like me in a situation where all we have is the default, generic, grey rectangle airport. Now, someone reading this might ask themselves: “Why make a Toronto Pearson for the sim?” Because Toronto Pearson is a very unique airport, with a distinctive layout, (Terminal and tarmac-wise), as well as a unique interior. It welcomes nearly 50 million passengers per year, making it Canada’s busiest airport by passenger traffic. It serves as Air Canada’s primary hub and is one of the larger hubs in North America. Additionally, Toronto-Pearson could serve as a huge iniBuilds aircraft hub. IRL, there are many ACA A220s, A320s and A330s departing and arriving into Toronto every day. On top of that, you add multiple A350s from Cathay Pacific, Lufthansa, Virgin Atlantic, PAL, Qatar Airways and Korean Air, as well as 2 daily A380s from EK and EY, this airport seems like a perfect fit for real-life operations of various lengths and destinations with iniBuilds aircraft. And thanks to its FedEx facility, it also sees multiple MD-11Fs come in and out every day! To add another point with the A350 and A380; iniBuilds could natively include their Multi-Jetway Technology to the respective gates, to make the experience of operating a widebody here even more immersive and realistic, while also allowing it to have a substantial point of differentiation from FlyTampa’s rendition. On a broader network perspective, Toronto feels like a missing link in their NA airport network. IRL, it serves flights to a whole bunch of other iniBuilds Airports (KLAX, KJFK, KDFW, KORD, EGLL, OTHH, OMDB, OMAA, VHHH to name a few). As such, having a detailed CYYZ for the Marketplace would allow NA flyers to hop from detailed airport to detailed airport, without having to necessarily do a 6+hour-long grind across the Atlantic. And just in general, the more choices, the better. In this case, iniBuilds would be the ONLY choice on the Marketplace. In conclusion, having an iniBuilds CYYZ on the Marketplace would be a great thing, because it would allow more users to have access to a detailed rendition of a major and unique airport serving an equally major and unique city. Thank you for taking the time to read my thoughts!

I have an active navigraph subscription, I logged in 2x and tried logging out and resetting, but the update navdata button is missing from here. I installed the latest AIRAC through the navigraph hub as well globally.

Ive discovered that its only happening in VR. works fine in 2d. unfortunately i have no way of videoing that. basically when i try to grab it it flaps up and down fast and wont move further than half way to the close position. Ive noticed that the usual grab hand icon that usually appears when an object can be grabbed in VR isnt appearing like it does for the flaps lever for example, so it appears to be an issue here in the way the spoiler lever is modelled that isnt correctly set up for VR. flap lever works perfectly in VR and grab hand appears as it should.