All Activity
- Past hour
-
Dear All, Just wanted to let you know what I managed to figure out what the problem was: It was a conflict with the payware add-on "Zirtek Aircraft Realistic Lights". Since this addon was streamed on my side and thus not in the community folder, I was not able to determine the conflict at first. After disabling the addon - everything works as intended. The problem is hereby resolved. Have a great weekend everyone!
-
After updating to 1.1.9, the pilots are still not visible....... They were visible in previous versions.
-
Matt30 joined the community
-
SAUDIA8 joined the community
- Today
-
av 1.1.8 a350 in msfs 2020 ctd everytime when loading the airport
Miyoshi replied to zhian627's topic in General Discussion
Same thing with V1.1.9. It won't start at all. -
airfryer joined the community
-
APo joined the community
-
PPadron joined the community
-
Would really appreciate iniBuilds taking a look at this… especially A350 specific items such as GND SPLRs etc for takeoff and landing memos. Thanks
-
Fernando Teixeira joined the community
-
Yep, can confirm on my side as well. It doesn’t settle to 0ft/min after update to 1.1.9
-
SleepingCookie joined the community
-
karl marx joined the community
-
CubicOak joined the community
-
mikeromeo77 joined the community
-
Why does it still take 8 minutes when I load my plan with a panel state of on GPU or On APU or even Ready for take off? Surley this 8 minute load time should only be applicable for a cold and dark aircraft start up state.
-
1.1.9 BUG IS BACK!!! Cab Press always +50 ft/min
-
1.1.9 Auto Step Climbs doesn´t work at all.
-
The plane is not displaying after the 1.19 update.
RogerWilco replied to kevin1518's topic in Systems
There are so many old and new bugs with 1.1.9, it doesn´t become better. No cockpit with cabin packs, Cab Press +50 ft/min all the time, Auto Stepclimbs don´t work at all and so on. Since the beginning, every update is one step forward, but two steps back. -
Hello I have same problem did you fix it Thank you
-
Still the same in 1.1.9. The electric pump is only showing on in the hydraulic page when you turn it on manually.
-
ClaasKrause started following Physical printer support (POS ... 80) // Remote KCCU / OIS
-
Physical printer support (POS ... 80) // Remote KCCU / OIS
ClaasKrause posted a topic in Suggestions
Hi dear iniBuilds team, first of all: huge props for the SU4 performance improvements on the A350. The gains in smoothness and stability are very noticeable, especially on longer sectors and in complex scenery. It’s clear a lot of deep, unglamorous work went into that, and it really shows. Now that performance has taken such a solid step forward, I’d like to suggest two features that would meaningfully push immersion and workflow realism to the next level, especially for users with more advanced setups. 1) Physical Printer Support (POS 80 / similar) Support for a physical cockpit printer (e.g. POS 80–style thermal printers) would be a fantastic addition. Use cases: ATIS printouts OFP / loadsheet Weather and route revisions Clearances or operational notes Several aircraft already show how powerful this can be for immersion, and the A350—with its strong procedural focus—would benefit enormously from it. 2) Remote KCCU / OIS (Tablet / Browser / Networked Device) A remote KCCU / OIS interface, similar in concept to what Fenix or FSLabs offer, would be a major quality-of-life improvement. Potential benefits: Entering FMGS data from a tablet via a browser Interacting with the OIS (charts, performance, documents) outside the main sim view Cleaner workflows for users without perfect mouse access to the cockpit Given the A350’s real-world architecture (KCCU + CDS + OIS), a remote implementation feels both technically appropriate and highly immersive. Why now? With SU4, the aircraft feels like it has reached a performance baseline where deeper interaction features become viable without compromising stability. These two additions would not just be “nice extras,” but meaningful steps toward a more complete, modern long-haul simulation environment. Thanks again for the work you’ve done so far — the A350 is already an impressive piece of engineering. I hope you’ll consider these ideas for a future update. Best regards, thanks, Claas -
Hey! in MSFS24 you have the ability to change pilots, there are no military options for the co pilot, can make screenshots a little bit.. yucky! As you can see, any chance of a default pilot with Apache gear on or the option to at least have it?
-
Why no A350 discount for Xbox players?
BoeingSpeedbird replied to BoeingSpeedbird's topic in General Discussion
No one ever responded to this. I’ll leave this here. Disappointing. -
I haven't installed any viewpoint or sound effects software
-
After updating to version 1.19 today, the cockpit is not displayed when entering MSFS2024. MSFS2024 SU4 I don't know how to solve this?
-
Hello Ini. 12-12 new update not good. In MSFS 2020 all airport signage is displaying as pink checkerboard all across the airfield. Please advise.
-
Controls, Buttons and Systems Become Unresponsive
patchadams502003 replied to Clements's topic in Systems
- Yesterday
-
Guess I had a one-off issue. Tried repeating it and could never get it to happen again. Saves seem to be working OK now.. Wonder why it happened ? Thanks
-
Is that a safe link to open? You only seem to have a new account. Besides, wouldn't it be simpler for Inibuilds to make the default Simbrief templates for the A359 and A35K with the highest number of known seats regardless of individual carrier configurations? Then we could create our own profiles for whatever carrier and base them on the correct number of seats as long as they never go past the max configuration. Also, I do appreciate the fact that Inibuilds has its own texture library. A Japan Airlines one for the A35K and a Malaysian Airlines one for the A359 Wouldn't go a miss. It cuts out the aggravation if going to third party sites etc.
-
I'm kind of new here so please bare with me, After I take off, I get the indication to throttle down to the CLMB detent. But every now and then when I do this, I get a bloue and yellow message popping up on the warning display regarding the weights and asked whether to confirm. I click yes and clear and the message dissapears but leaves a blue message behind saying "LDG PERF AFFECTED" which remains there for the remainder of the flight. Then at that moment on the left system dispay screen, I get a yellow warning saying something about BTV which I also clear. Also, I've noticed that the auto step climbs don't always work and are sometimes either ignored or have a message saying "ABOVE MAX FL" next to them. Like I say, this doesn't happen all of the time and happens on both the A359 and A35K. I've made sure both my Simbrief flight plan and the aircraft I'm curre tly flying are using the same measure units. So are these known bugs or is it likely thatI am doing something wrong during my pre-flight setup? Thanks in advance.
-
According to other reports it happens with the a340 as well, it has been said they get aerodynamic data, but as i've said a few times now I think it would be good for ini to get stick aggregate data from the digital flight data recorder of reference aircraft if possible, I doubt they will address this as they to standyby their comment of their flight models being accurate, but for Takeoff and Landing in that regard, the data must be not accurate there.
