Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Hello, do you also still have version 1.0.8?
  3. Good morning Fellow Aviators, I purchased the A340 upon release back in 2025 through the Microsoft Market place with credits like most I assume would. How can I obtain the transfer to the Ini Market place to make the installation and update more easier. I did notice there is no receipt that Microsoft sends out? How have you all made the transfer? Warm Regards
  4. Today
  5. Agree! Three different voices with different tones and volume levels. Not as par Airbus. Needs to be fixed asap. Regards
  6. FADEC should not be turned off during the elec powerup phase ?
  7. Hello, I have an issue with the updated A350 Fire Test process. Pushbutton does not launch the full test
  8. Hello, The cabin packs are no longer supported. You can use a Hues mod if you need but Inibuilds only has a default cabin now. Please see this announcement.
  9. Hi there, I just want to make sure I'm not missing something: I just installed version 1.2.1, and when I load a flight using any one of the Cabin Pack variants of the A350, I get a representation of the cabin, but no cockpit, no screens, no controls - the pilots are just hanging in the air. I assume this is not a bug, as it has been announced that the cabin packs will no longer be supported, so I assume they are no longer tested for compatibility when an update is made - right?
  10. I would like to ask the question in a slightly different manner: I remember it was stated in one of the recent updates that the door behaviour had been altered as to deliberately favour door 2L for jetway connection, seeing that this is the door airlines usually prefer to use if only one jetway is available (as is unfortunately still the case in MSFS 24, but that's a different topic...). I think this is fine and definitely an improvement, but it seems the preference for door 2 is a little too agressive, because door 2 is now used virtually always - even when the jetway is not even long enough to reach it. I have some screenshots with the A350-900 and -1000 in VGHS below for illustration, but I've had this problem at other airports as well (e.g. LVFR KMIA, Flightbeam KSFO). Is it perhaps possible to find a better compromise between using door 2 when possible, but also using door 1 when door 2 is too far away?
  11. i dont know if the problem is the gsx pro...I have the front left door configured and opened but the jetway is going only to the second left door[all airports]
  12. Yet, it is still not in v1.0.9
  13. Hi, Do you have any videos that can be attached to the thread that way I can pass it along to the developers? Thank you.
  14. Hello, First and foremost I want to say both thank you for your dedication, and thank you for taking the time to write this. Whilst I can't answer to everything in this post immediately as some things are just not possible for me to comment on currently as I am new to the position and have a decent amount of catching up to do, I hear both your frustrations and your compliments and I am grateful for both as much as I am grateful for the time and dedication you have put into your efforts to test our products and log issues that you find on the forums for the developers to view. As stated prior I can't speak on "What's going on with the A340 and A350?", but I can tell you that work is being done to bring more improvements to these airframes and I hope to be a better bridge for communications between the developers and you all in the community; whether it be feedback or bugs, suggestions or looking for support; the feedback that is left here in the forums is invaluable and I hope that as time goes on I will be able to improve the quality of communication both here and on the IniBuilds Official Discord. I've taken note of the issues you have listed with the MCDU Keyboard Entries Affecting the Aircraft as well as the HUD, (If you could make new entries for these I'll be happy to press them forward as well), and many of the other issues I've come across as I scroll through the backlog of forum issues that are still prominent today. All in all I'll leave it with this, improvements are coming on both fronts Development and Community, and I look forward to improving your experience here in the forums whether it be through bug sharing or feedback; everything here will be communicated with the team however I will be locking this thread as it's a prime example of insightful feedback and I don't want this thread to become bloated. Thank you once again for your dedicated support.
  15. Hello all, I have moved this issue into the IniManager Section and re-labeled it as both of you have encountered the issue of scenery configuration options disappearing and it is no longer contained to one scenery.
  16. Hello, It seems you are not the only person who has begun to encounter this issue. There is another thread that I am going to split your post above here into and then relocate into the IniManager Section. This issue is being raised to the team currently, thank you.
  17. Hi team, Just trialled the A350 v1.2.1. Re: VSD - glad to see some updates e.g. magenta area pre-departure. However have noted regression on the vertical profile no longer showing initial/non-cruise altitude level offs during climb phase or descends, with the predicted profile in dashed lines. V/S mode still not showing predicted profile - I believe this is known. See video of depature and climb - Thanks
  18. I can confirm that. With both MCDUs connected and correctly configured, none of my Winwing products work (I have pretty much all of them). As soon as I disconnect the FO MCDU, everything comes back to life. Worth mentioning that everything connected from Winwing works flawlessly on the Fenix A320.
  19. A similar thing happened to me - I had the 350 installed through a custom path outside the 2024 Community Folder. The Manager didn't recognize the aircraft, so I uninstalled and reinstalled it, which fixed the problem.
  20. Hi, These pictures are perfect for what I needed to be able to share with the devs. Thank you!
  21. Hi, Glad it was able to be resolved, I will still push this issue to the team as it seems to be a quirk of the Manger, thank you.
  22. Hello all, I have merged the thread as it is a pressing issue and I want to make sure it is addressed properly to all that are affected. I will press this issue with the team and respond once I know more, thank you.
  23. Hi, Are you able to provide media (either screenshots or videos) of this happening that way I can send the instances to the team? Thank you.
  24. Many thanks. Yes, it's more about the quirks of iniManager more than needing to disable certain features. Thanks again.
  25. Hi, I will push this issue to the team, thank you.
  26. Darn, I will push this issue to the team, I am sorry for the inconvenience at this time. If it is any consolation, YBBN is one of the less intensive sceneries as all of the configuration options are low impact, but I do understand the frustration of not being able to fully control the product you paid for.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...