All Activity

All good, we spend so many times across different aircraft that it tends to mix-up, even with a plane as sophisticated as Tristar 🙂 Happy Friday, and have a great weekend

Hi, thank you for the reply. That was a real SAT, in New Delhi. Anyway, thanks for the explanation.

Thanks! Maybe I'm imagining something else is all I meant - 😅

Hi As of 1.0.3, the PMS behaviour was changed to show "888" when it cannot calculate any valid result. It is also actively using the current SAT value to determine OPT. As such, it will update in flight, particularly when current SAT updates to sensible values where a valid result can be achieved. SAT of +40c at those weights won't net any valid results, hence the 888. Team is still investigating whether you can force a prediction on the ground, references we have are unclear but the behaviour currently is reflecting best the "known" reference logic.

Hi, I've seen in the promo video of the Belfast City scenery just recently released, that in the background of several shots, you can clearly see the big yellow H&W cranes in the docks, are they part of the scenery package? I assume they are not because I don't see them after buying the scenery, I have photogrammetry turned on in 2024. Just wondering how they appeared in the promo video - is there an extra scenery package nobodies mentioned?

Hi, This is intentional. At night (from dusk to dawn in the sim), the PFB brightness is controlled by the Utility Light. There is switch at the center that toggles it on/off, while the outer knob adjusts the intensity. This was added based on user requests to make the PFB behave more like a reflective surface at night. To achieve that effect, its brightness is linked to the Utility Light. Because the PFB is still technically a screen, it reacts to lighting conditions and may dim under direct light (like a flashlight), which is how the sim handles displays. Linking it to the Utility Light is the best workaround to this sim limitation to create the intended effect. 2026-04-24 13-15-38.mp4

You have conflict between WASM addons. Try to test only with A350.

last time the A350 crashed to desktop after 10hrs flight from my friend. Today I flew from OTHH to VHHH and short of descent the same happend to me too. A340-300 is working perfect as other non inibuilds Airplanes. I did install latest update and reboot my pc before using my A350. I believe there is a issue with the A350 !

Latest update 1.2.5, still getting crashes WASM: ERR_FATAL_FILE_ERROR (-239 / ffffff11) WASM: Error -239 / ffffff11 [SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver.wasm] SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver: Initializing Version [1.20.40] [SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver.wasm] SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver: Connected to FS2020 [SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver.wasm] SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver: The FS2020 subscriptions have been registered. [SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver.wasm] SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver: Airport data populated. [fsdt-msfs-bridge.wasm] fsdt-msfs-bridge: Simconnect Dispatch proc set. [noolaero-vdgs-lppt.wasm] [noolaero-vdgs-lppt] EXCEPTION 25: The AI operation requested cannot be completed [noolaero-vdgs-essa.wasm] [noolaero-vdgs-essa] EXCEPTION 25: The AI operation requested cannot be completed [noolaero-vdgs-eidw.wasm] [noolaero-vdgs-eidw] EXCEPTION 25: The AI operation requested cannot be completed [noolaero-vdgs-lszh.wasm] [noolaero-vdgs-lszh] EXCEPTION 25: The AI operation requested cannot be completed [noolaero-vdgs-bikf.wasm] [noolaero-vdgs-bikf] EXCEPTION 25: The AI operation requested cannot be completed [noolaero-vdgs-ksea.wasm] Sim | EXCEPTION 25: The AI operation requested cannot be completed [noolaero-vdgs-klga.wasm] [noolaero-vdgs-klga] EXCEPTION 25: The AI operation requested cannot be completed [SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver.wasm] AIRCRAFT_TITLE[0]: A350-900 (Default Cabin) [SS_WMKK_Airport_Driver.wasm] INIBUILDS: A350-900 (Default Cabin) [WASM][IO] ./data\Textures\RMP\RMP-Main.png not found [WASM][IO] ./data/Textures/FCU/FCUCompo1k.png not found [WASM][IO] ./data\Textures\ECAM\Wheel1000More.png not found [WASM][IO] /Data\Textures\PFD\PFDA350Elements.png is neither a vfs path ('.\') or work path ('\work\)' WASM: Error during EFIS_gauge_draw execution. Error code : 0xc0000005 WASM: Module vfs://inibuilds-aircraft-a350/SimObjects/Airplanes/A350/attachments/inibuilds/Function_Interior_A350/panel/inibuilds-A350.wasm is now dirty

Same here, even seems to become more prevalent for me. All my last flights in the A340 were affected by this...

Dear all, I made a flight yesterday night without any problem on the EFB. When trying a new one this morning, my EFB is blank (gray empty page). I've tried disabling / enabling the add-on in MSFS2024, uninstalling liveries, but nothing changes. What I don't understand is that I haven't change anything since yesterday night. Just closed the sim and re-opened it this morning. Does someone have an idea of what can cause this ? Thank you for your help. Thomas P.S. : my bad : it's actually the night lighting that is the problem. During the day the EFB is ok. But during night time, with the EFB lightning to the maximum, it's barely visible...

Hi, only once I had a condensation effect on the wings and I am not able to reproduce it, no matter how I change the weather conditions. Any insight on that would be nice.

I already reported this here: It's been flagged as a known problem.

Getting the same. 1.0.3 seems to have added back a bunch of old problems 1.0.2 fixed a pile of new ones.

Probably the same issue reported here....

Not sure that's the case Jamir. I actually had a -25 landing last night at CYHZ and didn't hear any callouts beyond the 100 and 50. The 30ft call is pretty important for judging the flare. It really shouldn't be any different to GPWS, the callouts play even at higher rates of descent, just the cadence is obviously faster and of course one may be skipped if there's a really high rate of descent happening. In the L1011 the FE was just a human version of that! Would really appreciate if this could be looked at again, it should be possible to hear the natural pace of 50, 30, 20 and 10 with any normal landing up to 300fpm or so. Appreciate the attention, thank you

Hi, do you have a video of this happening. Thank you

1.0.3

If you really grease the landing rate (less than 50fpm) you should hear them all trigger, but otherwise they will skip some callouts to prevent un-natural callout or overlap

I have the same pax issue with IniBuilds A350-900 in msfs2024. Today I updated the A350 and still. Only enter un passenger but curiously after landed, large number of passengers appear in the cabin ready to deboard. Pat

Loaded IniBuilds A-350-900 in msfs2024 and parked in PANC Gate B-3 Heavy and I enter 254 pax in the MCDU but GSX only shows 1/1 passengers boarded instead. How to remedy? Pat

This problem is still not solved in the latest version 😞 I really hope that this issue can be solved for MSFS2020

Also, the "Press to test and reset" button clickspot in oxygen mask is missing now

Hi, Firstly the A350-900 and ULR doesn't sit on the floor , which I believe is known. 2nd there is a white bar which connects its self from the main support shaft to the landing gear , on the right side it's modelled correctly and its "bolted" , on the left hand side the same white bar isn't bolted in and it goes through the connecting bar , this modelling error is on both the A350-900 and ULR - A350-1000 is not affected Photo's have been uploaded to your official discord - https://discord.com/channels/535246634448191499/1496926209810890762 Video URL -

The yellow tab is designed like that and will not return until next flight.