All Activity

Fixed as of v1.0.7 Update

Apologies for delay in response, but issue is logged for further investigation. Thanks!

Hi Sorry for delay in response. Missing Red Horizontal Lines on T5A Jetway extensions - Logged for the dev team, the bug was reproduced Missing Logos / Plain White on T5A Jetway extensions - We cannot reproduce this issue on either HD/SD textures or with/without terminal interiors (see above image for ref). - The issue maybe because of a package conflict - either duplicated EGLL scenery installed or another installed scenery affecting the model/textures used. - Please verify via My Library that no other instance of EGLL is active. - To rule out other addon conflicts, try running with just EGLL in your community folder. Rename your existing Community folder (e.g. _Community), create a new one and place only inibuilds-airport-egll-heathrow inside. Clear your scenery indexes and load into EGLL to verify. To restore after testing, delete the new Community folder and rename your old folder back to Community. New HSBC Logo Your suggestion is noted. However please understand that our scenery was made with best available references we had at the time during development and the logos at present reflect that. Advertisements in particular are dynamic by nature and will keep changing over time so there will always be an element of "inaccuracy" in that regard with the digital twin counterparts. Thanks!

Hello all, I noticed that switching the north ref to "true" doesn´t effect the DDRMI (right next to the button). However, as seen below, the switching seems to affect the DDRMI in the real aircraft. The displayed courses slighty move in the same way as they do on the ND. Would be great to have that effect added 🙂

Hi We do not have any planned POI additions at the moment but your suggestion is noted for future development. Thanks!

Some of the containers on the main apron are hovering:

Same issue

This issue is still present, even though for some unknown reason the topic was locked last November: 🤔 It's not a GSX issue or an issue with the stock LOWI scenery. It has to be something else.

I'm experiencing the same issue where throttle axis 1/2 and 3/4 work without a problem, but after pushback, only throttles 1 and 4 move. After disconnecting and reconnecting, it works for a bit, but then it happens again. I'm using the FlightSimFactory v3 A320 throttle add-ons.

Hi No there are no hand-placed static aircraft with this scenery. Thanks!

Hi, No we do not advertise the scenery as compatible. Thanks!

Hi, This is by design. That area of the ramp and taxiways are not openly accessible. They're fenced off and guarded similarly IRL as well. Unfortunately due to sim limitations and particular layout of the runway, the sim-ATC or add-ons may try to route you this way but in reality will not be possible or issued either. Thanks

Hey thanks for your report. Will forward to the team. If you have any additional reference photographs (IRL, not sim) to share, it would be helpful.

Hey Liam, Thanks for your report. 'No Jetways Here' Due to a sim limitation we are limited to just 1 jetway per gate. We cannot attach multiple jetways to the same gate , nor can we to attach the same jetway to multiple different gates. You can see the same in the GSX Gate Selection menu. The gates with jetways are indicated with 1x/J. 'Invalid Jetway Data' These might be a GSX profile bug. These will be seen as 0x/J on GSX. So for the reported instances: 308/308L - The jetway there is assigned to main gate (308) while the side gate (308L) is stairs only. 'No Jetway Here' is expected for 308L. 207/207R - The jetway there is assigned to the main gate (207) while the side gate (207R) is walk-in only. 'No Jetway Here' is expected for 207R. 209/209L - The jetway there is assigned to main gate (209) while the side gate (209L) is stairs only. 'No Jetway Here' is expected for 209L. However I do see that GSX cannot access Gate 209 and showing 'Bad Jetway Data'. The jetway itself is working directly via EFB request or sim ATC request as defined in the scenery though. Gate 209 seems to be the only affected gate in the entire scenery. Logged this for the team. Thanks!

What does "best done via a 3rd party control process" mean? The input-only way via Mobiflight is not what I want to use. Given that the A350 is one of the the most expensive airplanes one can buy for MSFS2024 and it is promoted as "Premium", I do hope iniBuilds will be taking the effort to make it work with the probably most popular airbus MCDU hardware, also given the lack of a proper consumer-targeted A350 MCDU hardware.

This is best done via a 3rd party control process and the base MCDU is quite different in the keymap to the KCCU and might not suit every user. I personally use Mobiflight as an input only profile and it works well enough, but it requires a bit of customization.

Does this mean iniBuilds has finished their job and exposed an API that allows the integration with the WinCtrl MCDU? If yes, why haven't you updated the A350 to be compatible with the MCDU, as this aircraft is under your full control? Yes I know the A350 MCDU is a bit different especially with the screen but you still can make it work with the WC MCDU hardware. Would be really appreciated.

Hello, i understand. Thank you for the quick response and for the hint to report this via the Asobo official forums.

Hi Steve, thx for reply. But these I have already found as you can see in the screenshot. Would be nice if this Var would be available in the next updates. keep up the good work thx Chris

In Customize identity removed the co-pilot and no problem In Customize identity selected a new copilot and co-pilot was sitting in the cockpit. After stopping MSFS2024 and restart MSFS2024 copilot was sitting outside cockpit again. so some goes wrong in the restart mode this time. Now I remove the co-pilot for ever and my issue is solved, but not for Inibuilds I am afraid.

I would like to respectfully request that iniBuilds consider developing the Dash 8 Q400 and Q300. iniBuilds is widely recognized as a team of experts with deep technical knowledge and exceptional attention to detail. Your strengths in high-fidelity systems simulation and industry-leading 3D modeling are well known across the community. At present, there is no truly modern, high-quality Dash 8 Q400 or Q300 available on the market. These aircraft remain extremely popular in real-world regional operations across North America, Europe, and many other regions, yet they are significantly underrepresented in current simulators. A Dash 8 Q400/Q300 developed by iniBuilds would fill a clear gap in the market and would be highly appreciated by simmers who value realistic turboprop operations, challenging procedures, and short-field performance. Thank you for your continued commitment to quality and for considering this request.

Today, after inserting the mouse key-bindings from Fenix A320 into the FeDEX N667FE the pilots are outside the cockpit again.. After removing cameras,cfg the pilots went away. Inserting cameras.cfg the pilots are back in the ouside position. Tomorrow I will complete delete all pilots from 2024

T

Airarc is Updated on the A340-300 but not showing correctly in the FMS. Reloged Navigraph and Simbrief. Closed and restarted Game x times. No Engines Running, on ground. When init Request, it prints the Right Plan, but the FMS doesnt have it. a350 isnt updating the cycle at all. If I Click Update, it Updates it (downloading) over and over again without finishing it. Thanks in advance and have a Great one

I have not enabled autosave. Does a reinstall help?