All Activity

Hi, we did make changes to the runways for the FS2024 version of the scenery and were able to get FSLTL to use the full length of the runway. BATC seemed to be dependent on other factors, but beyond our ability to control. Best, Steven

Hi, in the A340 and A350 there is no need under normal operation to listen to nav radio morse tones in order to identify them. They are automatically identified by the aircraft - when the LS or VOR identifier is shown on the screen, the navaid has been tuned and identified by the avionics.

Hi Mikai, regarding the GPWS sounds, there are actually several different soundsets that are used depending on the airline and specific equipment installed. We have even heard a boeing style "TWENTY-FIVE hundred" call in some recordings. The current recording are the highest quality and cleanest samples we have from an actual aircraft, so for now they are what we will stick with. Best, Steven

I have the sound code open on my laptop right now, funny enough. I’m working on a mod to fix this.

Any news on this? i miss the 108

hi i have the same trouble with lax enhanced scenery.its impossible to take off or land. so much stutters. Among other runway 25 and taxiways too. i ve uninstall the scenery and clean the catch. but no result. no problem with others sceneries. Any help appreciate Thanks in advance Pierre

3 Minutes and 30 seconds THE 2000 .... 500

Hello, first of all, I want to say that the new callouts are really well done overall. You can clearly tell that a lot of work and attention went into them, and most of the announcements already sound very close to the real-life versions. Big thanks to the ini team for that! However, I noticed that the “2500” callouts are still not fully accurate compared to the real ones. Right now, the ini version sounds more like a direct “2500”, while in reality it sounds more like a separated or stretched “2000…500”. That small pronunciation/detail is what makes the real callout sound more natural and authentic. Besides that, all the other calls already sound really good, which is why this one stands out a bit more. It would be great if you could take another look/listen specifically at the 2500 calls and adjust them a little closer to the real-life version. I attached an example in the topic so the difference is easier to notice. Still, huge compliments to the whole team — the overall work is really impressive! Best regards

No airline pilot has ever had to remove these things on a walk round check. It's completely unrealistic. It annoys me every time I load the plane. Please make them optional and removable from the OIS. It's very annoying to get halfway through a cockpit setup then find you have to get out and click them in walkround view.

I'll pass this along to the team.

I usually just click somewhere in the MDCU after installing the update, usually a route page or ATC COM page, something that takes away from the INIT Page with the Data Cycle, and then I enter back into the INIT Page and the cycle is always updated. I've never had to reload the sim to refresh their navdata nor do I personally know anyone else that has yet to do so. I'll ask the team about keeping the prior data on-board and the feasibility of that as it could be helpful. Let me know if this helps

Love flying the Beluga! However, when I enter an approach in the MCDU, it seems to pick up the wrong approach fixes in another continent and build 5000+ nm legs to get to those. So whenever I try to load an approach, the fmgc just computes insanely long legs that mess up my flight plan. Is anyone experiencing this problem? I have updated navigraph airacs.

I asked this last year and still no response. I have 1.2.6 installed, have downloaded the latest AIRAC in the OIS but the FMGC still will not update in the sim. You have to reload. Why can't this be done in the Navigraph Hub, would be much easier?

I'd like to ask how the 350 8x speed is achieved? The EFB only supports up to 4x speed, and the built-in game speed options don't apply to 350

This means, your system is overwhelmed. If the system can't maintain a stable FPS with high sim rates, it is decreased. You have to reduce settings in order to use higher sim rates. I can use the A350 up to 4x all the time, and during cruise even up to 8x.

The A340 and the A350 are completely useless.

Had given the latest a340 update another chance and ended up with the same result.

This is still a problem in the current version of the scenery and is especially noticeable when using BATC.

I am on version 1.2.6 and I am having exactly the same issue. After landing and at the end of the taxing breaks temp jumps to 300C. Something gets wrong since last update!

If the station is not providing an _A or _D ATIS then you need to select none from the drop down menu.

Can confirm this as well for PC Inibuilds version as per below. @IniJamir are the team able to look into this? Thanks, Wisam

The A350 crashed even in its default vanilla state after removing third-party add-ons.　It will load in 2024, so I'll give up on 2020.

I find most of the time this can happen for many of reasons. Usually any sim issues fixed by restarting console and/or sim, but is annoying to do if something similar happens after you’ve already setup FMS.

Interesting issue. If manual flight stays wings-level but the autopilot keeps bringing back the wing-low attitude, that does sound like something specific to the AP behavior..