All Activity

Thank you!

Hello Inibuilds, have you forgotten the Tristar?

I'm with MouldyRF here. I have the same problem with the A220. My saved profiles never load with it. I was thinking of putting this problem on the A220 forum but will leave it here to see how far it goes. Every other aircraft I own in MSFS2024 loads with the saved controller profile. That includes the A300-600. It seems a bit odd that some people are having this problem with two of Inibuilds aircraft. A coincidence maybe. Bruce R

Are you reducing the throttles to idle once it calls out "retard"? Manual landing or auto land? You shouldn't have to push the stick down either, the nose wheel will come down as you decelerate. Worth also ensuring you don't have any assistances turned on in the sim menu

The OIS shows TOW as 420T, the ECAM shows it as 415T and final loadsheet shows it as 389T, while Simbrief shows as 414T. The difference between loadsheet and the ECAM is the ZFW. The TO performance is also vastly different between Simbrief and the OIS. I know that the Flex temps are different but for the higher TO weight in the OIS how can the speed be lower. In fact if weights were the same the speeds should be the same even if Flex was different.

Had it at Frankfurt but yesterday it worked at Doha and Heathrow.

Hello, the plane model cannot taxi after landing. How much longer until this issue is updated and resolved? I'm going crazy. Also, is the issue of the frequency jumping around randomly.

Hi Guys, Just to let you all know I solved my stutters on take off above 100kts and 400ft. All I done was go into my marketplace account and physically downloaded the A380 and not have MSFS24 stream it. Just loaded into a flight OMDB - CYYZ and departed without stutters butter smooth. Hope this helps 🙂

Hello @iniBuilds, This texture issue is still present and should be compared with the original aircraft. There are many color differences, mainly white parts that should be grey, or vice versa. Since I enjoy looking out of the window in VR, I tend to focus more on the wing area and notice things like the wing pods being white on all Lufthansa liveries, while the classic old Lufthansa livery has grey wing pods. I appreciate your time!

Hi there! This topic was brought up before, but there have still been no changes. The best solution would be to allow the window tint to be adjusted via the EFB. The tint is very useful in strong sunlight, especially with VR headsets, but sometimes it makes everything look too dark. An adjustable tint level would allow users to adapt it to different lighting conditions. Here are some comparisons looking through the window and outside the window. Hopefully, they make the issue clearer to find a solution.

The aircraft is perfect—the sounds, the sense of weight, and the deep systems all deliver on the promises made; overall, I have no complaints about the plane itself. My only observation concerns the wing flex and engine wobble, which need improvement: the wings should sway naturally as a whole, and the engines should also move organically during taxiing, the takeoff roll, and turbulence. If they manage to add that, the aircraft will be 100% perfect.

Good evening. I’m having an issue with landing. The plane is wanting to relaunch and take off. I set the speeds as it calls for. 143kts. I Set full flaps and have the spoilers ready as well as the auto braking. The back wheels touch nice and neat (-175). Then I proceed to push the yoke/stick fwd to get the nose to go down but the aircraft would go nose up and take off again. Then stall out. What am I doing wrong?

*Update. I am not having any issues on my end. I'm wondering if there is something in your community folder that is causing issues?

Thank you for explaining your position in detail. I now understand your reasoning better and why it would not be appropriate to make a change to the A340 based solely on an issue occurring in the beta. My disappointment is mainly because this particular A340 you released was one of the main reasons I bought MSFS 2024. That is why it is especially disappointing for me that I currently cannot use the passenger version in the SU7 beta, while the Cargo version loads normally. I understand your suggestion to return to the stable version, and I will wait to see how the beta develops and whether the issue is resolved in the upcoming versions. Thank you again for the explanation and for your work on the A340.

Hi, While I understand your concern, I think we also have to be understanding of the situation from our side. iniBuilds cannot reasonably chase down issues that appear within a sim update beta when, in many cases, the issue may be related to the core sim rather than our addon. If we implement a fix based on behavior observed in a beta, and the issue is subsequently resolved on the MSFS side, we would then have to go back and rework or revert our own changes. Unfortunately, this simply isn't a practical approach. I hope this helps clarify our stance and the reasoning behind it. Thanks for your understanding!

Hi, Do you have an active Navigraph subsription? That is required to view the airport map.

Hi Kyle, thanks for the info. I downloaded the map-server from the iniManager and launched it. Terrain works fine, but the airport map still does not. It still displays the Airport Map Fault on the ND. Regards

I would also advise that you move your sim to the console hard drive if your using external memory. It does help.

I'm on Xbox and I have had some issues in the first few days but I have done the increase in cache size and I have disabled all airports that I am not flying to in that session. I haven't had any issues since and I have now done a handful of long hauls of 6+ hours. I also use the performance options in the EFB and noticed way better perf. then before.

I understand that returning to the stable version is the recommended solution while SU7 is in beta, and I also understand that beta versions can introduce compatibility issues. However, what I find difficult to understand is why this problem is so specific and severe with the A340. All of my other add-on aircraft continue to load and work normally in the SU7 beta. The problem only affects the A340, and even more specifically, the Cargo version of the A340 loads correctly, while the passenger versions do not load at all and remain stuck loading indefinitely. I have already followed all the troubleshooting steps recommended by iniBuilds, including clearing the relevant files and folders, completely uninstalling and reinstalling the A340, and restarting my system. I have also waited for more than two hours for the aircraft to finish loading, but without any result. There is also an important reason why I would prefer to remain on the beta version. On the stable version, I have another serious issue during long flights: when I reach the destination airport after a long flight, my FPS can drop dramatically and become extremely low. This is one of the reasons I want to remain on the SU7 beta and see whether the changes in this version address this long-flight performance issue. Therefore, returning to the stable version would allow me to use the A340 again, but it would also bring back the serious FPS problem I experience after long flights. I completely understand that iniBuilds cannot guarantee full compatibility with a beta version of MSFS. However, I would really appreciate it if this specific A340 issue could be investigated further, especially since my other add-on aircraft work normally and the Cargo version of the A340 itself loads without any problem. The A340 is an excellent aircraft, and I have a lot of respect for the work iniBuilds does. I genuinely hope that a solution can be found that will allow me to continue using the A340 while remaining on the SU7 beta.

Ok thank you!

Thanks will also test this on my end!

I’ll treat it as a one time thing and see if I notice any improvements. I’ve used Clear Skies and cleared my caches. I noticed my Auto FPS was playing up, so it might not have changed my TLOD. Since I loaded in earlier it was better. I shall test again soon and report back. Thank you. Can I also add that the ILS 23R is faulty for CAT 3 it’s to far right.

Well for one on that second video DCLB3 is over 83 percent no where near 74% that you stated normal climb would have been upwards of 90%

Thanks! Shouldn't have any issue with those settings, I'll verify on my end!