All Activity

Hey Guys, I tried doing a flight yesterday and started everything as usual. But this time the MCDU didn't show Top of Descend but it showed Top of Climb. I tried trouble shooting it with double checking ZFW, ZFWCG, cost Index, no discontinuity, performance page,etc. Still couldn't figure out what is wrong and it never happened to me. Im running MSFS2024 updated version. Any thoughts guys? Thanks Elvis

Ok just an update, I removed everything from the community folder for the exception of the following: A350 A350 delta livery Atlanta scenery Miami scenery FSTSL The system didnt crash or freeze...

Last 2 images....

I recently got a new computer build, its pretty good, specs below: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (12-Core) 5.5 GHz Turbo (3D V-Cache) (Zen 5) Motherboard: MSI PRO X870E-P (Wi-Fi) (AMD X870E) (Up to 3x PCI-E Devices) (DDR5) System Memory: 64GB DDR5 6000MT/s Kingston FURY RGB Graphics Card(s): 1x GeForce RTX 5080 16GB (VR Ready) Power Supply: 1000W Digital Storm Performance Series (Semi-Modular) (80 Plus Gold) Storage Set 1: 1x SSD M.2 (1TB Samsung 990 PRO) (NVM Express) Storage Set 2: 1x SSD M.2 (1TB Samsung 990 PRO) (NVM Express) Extreme Cooling: H20: Stage 3: TRYX Panorama SE 360 Liquid CPU Cooler (Triple Fan) (Fully Sealed + No Maintenance) Operating System: Microsoft Windows 11 Home (64-Bit) I have no issues with the computer, and everything runs really smoothly, I just feel like I could get more performance out of MSFS2020 - I average 30-50FPS, 25-40 at heavier airports. I have a cap set to 75FPS, but it rarely reaches 75FPS - and I am almost positive that this kind of system should have no problem reaching that. So I start this thread hoping to learn a little more what others are running as far as settings. Eventually I will get MSFS24, but not until PMDG/Inibuilds comes out with 747/a380/a350v2 For ref, and some q's: DX11 vs Dx12 - when I run DX12, I notice much more memory usage and stuttering at heavy airports like NYC area. what do you use? For some reason I cannot change the DLSS model preset - if I change from the apps recommended, MSFS crashes. Running latest NVIDIA Game Ready Drivers. Running GSX, and all the popular aircraft addons: inibuild, pmdg, etc. Thx!

I bought a Lenovo gaming laptop and found that with the default highest graphics settings (some settings weren't maxed out), the frame rate when flying the A220 was 4 times higher (20 frames per second) than when I flew the A220 on a handheld console.

First off, I am excited to hear about V2. Now on to my wish list. I would like to see improvements in the cockpit glass. The glass on the avionics quality does not come across as sharp, they look a tad grainy and amateurish. Over all an improvement in flight deck textures over all would be a great improvement. How about a switch on the EFB that we can choose to have the cabin curtains open or closed on start up, and get rid of those engine covers, they are not realistic. I think a look at Fenix quality would be a great place to start.

Premium was supposed to be kinda V2… But well.. sigh

Hi, regarding the recently shown Early-MSN (Batch 2) and Modern-MSN (Batch 7) configurations: Will the appropriate configuration be automatically selected based on the aircraft/livery/registration, at least for official iniBuilds liveries? For example, if I select a Lufthansa livery representing a specific D-AIMx aircraft, will the EFB automatically default to the configuration appropriate for that particular aircraft, or will Early/Modern MSN always have to be selected manually by the user? Also, are these two configurations intended to represent complete aircraft standards, or will individual equipment/system options be configurable separately? I really appreciate the dedicated and hard work inibuilds is putting in here, and I can't wait to fly the A380.

left and right aisle

I definitely agree with the previously mentioned speedbrake rattling/buffeting sound. I understand that deploying the speedbrakes creates disturbed airflow over the wing and causes aerodynamic loads and vibrations throughout the airframe. However, I am not sure how much of this would actually be audible in the real A350 flight deck. In the current version, the rattling effect seems extremely pronounced and gives me the impression that the entire flight deck is being shaken. If possible, it would be great if this could be compared against recordings or feedback from A350 pilots. Another area I would love to see revisited is the sound of the cockpit pushbuttons and KCCU keys. I recorded examples of the EFIS control panel pushbuttons, ECAM control panel pushbuttons and KCCU keyboard. They do have different sound effects depending on the panel, but to my ears they all sound somewhat artificial and overly “plasticky”. It is difficult to describe precisely, but they don't quite convey the mechanical feel I would expect from actual flight deck controls. More authentic recordings and/or some additional mechanical depth to these sounds would greatly improve the tactile impression of operating the cockpit. There is also an airflow/fan-like sound during initial electrical power-up that I noticed. After switching on the batteries and the first systems begin to come alive, this sound appears almost instantaneously at full volume. I assume this represents an avionics ventilation fan or another airflow-related system, although I am not certain. If that is indeed what the sound represents, I would expect the fan/airflow noise to build up more gradually as the fan spools up and airflow is established, rather than appearing immediately at its final level. A short fade/spool-up transition could make this part of the power-up sequence feel considerably more natural. Finally, I would really appreciate another look at the engine start sound sequence and its synchronization with the simulated engine parameters. I made recordings of a cold engine start both with and without the OIS active-noise-cancelling headset option enabled. What particularly stands out to me is the timing of the characteristic low-frequency rumble/spool-up sound following light-off. Fuel flow and EGT already indicate that combustion has begun, but the prominent engine-start rumble only becomes audible roughly 12-15 seconds later, at which point fuel flow is already around 900 kg/h in my recording. To my ears, this makes the sound sequence feel disconnected from what the engine indications are showing. I would expect the audible transition associated with light-off and the subsequent acceleration towards idle to correlate more closely with fuel introduction, EGT rise and the actual engine spool-up. The individual sound itself may be fine; it is mainly the timing/layering and synchronization that currently sounds unnatural to me. I have recorded short videos demonstrating all of the above and can attach them as references. Pushbuttons Avionics fan? ENG1 Start without ANC ENG2 Start with ANC And as Harrycot already said, I, too, would like to thank you all for the hard work and the opportunity to provide feedback - I really appreciate it.

Hi iniKyle and the team, Thanks for opening this thread and giving us the opportunity to share feedback for the V2 soundpack. Here are the main areas regarding the sound environment that currently affect immersion on the A350: 1. Cockpit Audio Mixing & Avionics/Packs Noise Current behavior: The cockpit environment feels overly muted and "muffled" since recent updates, yet the avionics, fans, and pack noises completely drown out the engine audio. High frequencies are harsh, while low frequencies are almost non-existent inside the flight deck. Expected behavior: A much more dynamic acoustic balance. While the A350 flight deck is well-insulated in real life, the deep low-end rumble and bass of the Trent XWB engines should still be felt and heard, especially during spool-up and high-thrust conditions (TOGA / Flex). 2. Trent XWB Engine Dynamics & Spool Sound Current behavior: Engine sounds feel flat and lack punch during acceleration. The signature buzzsaw effect at high N1 settings lacks depth, and the transition/spooling between idle and climb thrust feels synthetic with noticeable volume steps. Expected behavior: Richer, deeper bass and a gradual, natural progression of the engine note during spool-up. The soundscape needs to accurately reflect the sheer power of the Trent XWB engines, similar to high-standard airliner soundpacks (like modern A220 audio implementations). 3. Sound Spatialization & Environmental Effects Current behavior: Structural and aerodynamic sounds (e.g., speedbrakes deployment, gear extension) feel detached from the cockpit environment, while overall cockpit acoustics lack 3D depth. Expected behavior: Better leverage of MSFS 2024's native 3D spatialization engine to provide natural sound isolation, realistic cockpit resonance, and smoother acoustics when moving between the flight deck and cabin. Here is some video that I find useful for you : Appreciate the hard work on bringing the A350 to native MSFS 2024 standards!

Hi. I have just done my next flight. Here is what I have found. I discovered to my surprise that there were still some key bindings for my keyboard which involved the num pad which I use for my cameras, but which also control the rudder and ailerons. I have deleted these, and my wings are now completely level. Clearly I have found the smoking gun! Please see the following video. https://youtu.be/1Rr5i4EvrZ4?si=TPg9lNh2rMBeujGH This shows that Ground menu flashes when GSX is enabled. Turn off GSX and the flashing stops. On my system the flashing starts again as soon as I enable GSX again. I logged out of Navigraph and logged back in again. The ANF still won't follow the aircraft, and today I spotted that this is the case on departure and on arrival. Incidentally do I need to switch the ND to Plan mode for the ANF to function? I have updated my GSX since the last flight, and today I did not have the same boarding issue as last week. However, please see below. I am confused about how I should be loading the aircraft with GSX integration. Today I clicked on the "Load with GSX" button anticipating that this would lead to refuelling, loading of catering and boarding of passengers automatically. However I discovered that clicking on that button meant that my fuel was load instantly, even though GSX sent the fuel bowser. Is there any way to get gradual refuelling rather than instant? I also discovered that catering and passengers were not loaded automatically, and I had to select these from the GSX menu on the OIS Ground page. What is the correct way to load the aircraft with GSX? EDIT. Sorry, there was another issue I discovered. The destination weather I was given under Landing Perf in the OIS was different from the METAR/ATIS I received from ATC COM --> D-ATIS. And the winds and temperature were also different. The OIS gave me a QNH of 999 whereas the D-ATIS gave me 1000. I checked on Windy.com and the correct QNH was actually 1000. I decided to stick with what the OIS had given me, but the discrepancy was a concern on arrival as I couldn't be certain that my altitude reading was correct. Many thanks.

j ai une question est ce que avec 32 go de ram je peux faire un vol de 12 heure avec le 350 inibuild en mettant tout mes réglage en medium

So sad, now the A220 is not usable for me.

And Taxiway L is missing. And A5 https://i.postimg.cc/RhZCVsHj/2026-aug-23-001.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/wMjxTfNY/2026-aug-23-002.jpg

Yes, I did that; I had the FSDT scenery before.

Using the iniBuilds EFB, we can de-select all GPS units in the cockpit. Great option. But how can we set the NAV1 frequency without any GPS unit? The primary NAV1 in the overhead panel does not seem to be functional. Al other nav panels like NAV2 and ADF seem to work. Would it be possible to make the NAV1 overhead panel functional as well, when no GPS is selected in the EFB?

No you are absolutely correct . I’ve just landed and moved it from armed position and they retracted on the wings . I’m used to flying LVFR airbuses and the lever does move all the way down and have to move it all the way back up . Just goes to show the quality In inibuilds… it’s time to say goodbye to LVFR planes .

So I added as extra 10000lb of fuel but still shows as not enough fuel yet 15.9 pounds extra . Or am I not doing this right ?

Hi, in the latest built I there are no more minima callouts. I enter the MDA in the FMC. I tried both clicking the "acctivate final approach" and not. But either way no minimum callout appears. I have tuned up the "systems" sound slider in the EFB but this does not change anything either. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug in the 1.1.11 version?

I can't fly the plane with the nose-wheel steering. I've tried everything; I'm using the "Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS" as my controller. Perhaps someone can help me with the settings... Best regards, Heinz Marmetschke

Hello, I can't complete a single flight with the A300-600. About half an hour into the flight, all the systems fail and the plane becomes uncontrollable. Reinstalling the A300 and deleting the WASM A300 folder didn't solve the problem. This happens on every flight.

Hello! I am the one who wrote the suggestions for bird strike! Now, let’s move on to another potential additional procedures to your existing failure simulation: reset panels For example: According to FCOM (own copy but please consult your pilots and engineer’s for discrepancy) Faults associated with GPS jamming includes: Or all faults associated with SURV Can be eligible for an AESU 1(2) reset in the reset panel provided that The ECAM/OEB procedure permits it The reset is permitted in the reset table to ECAM faults such as those faults above They are only permitted one at a time and cycled once. No two attempts As failure to follow reset FCOM advice could lead to a reset in factory on ground settings such as the fmc a, b and c. The reset panels could risk erasing all data and flight plan in those systems. What’s more, Faults such as FWS (1)2, Flaps 1(2) fault and FQMS 1(2) are eligible for reset according to the reset table. I noticed that there is a dynamic vibration option in your failures menu thus I would like to look forward on how it behaves with a bird strike situation. Hope it helps!

Thanks its so mind boggling at this point