All Activity

Don't know if its just a one time occurence but during my flight I have had the altitude horn not sound at all.

Copy. Let me know what more should I do to help you guys. I will need to pause using the A300 for now but I'll be around the corner if you need anything else.

No that shouldn't be necessary, the screenshot was all I needed as we're investigating a hunch currently.

Want me to load the A300 and run the command search again?

Exactly what I was looking for, frustration is understood, I took no offense :)

Thanks for understanding @IniJamir. I am really upset right now, to be honest. But I want to help. Nevermind something I said without thinking. I restarted MSFS2024 and tried that console command again.

Hi, I've updated the image to show what I need regarding the startup, but as you said the logs were empty anyways so I don't believe it will make a difference as far as exactly what I am looking for in regards to startup, that said I don't like to discount anything so if you could still check for me again with the search line "it will use" as shown in the working image below. Additionally I and we as a team do care how you fly and getting the product to function as designed, and intended for all of our users. Thank you

Your image is corrupted but I searched the console with "it will use" and found no entries with that. Just had another crash. This time I am 100% sure it will ALWAYS happen on STAR inserting. Another video (timestamped): https://www.youtube.com/live/GmFw8NI0i40?si=xdBR4FwFjdpYYvub&t=3256 @IniJamir this is the second time I had to abort a livestream due to this WASM Crash. I know you don't really care about how I fly in this simulator but I have a small audience. I invested on your aircraft quite a bit (A350, A340, L1011 and now the A300). It's really disheartening to go throught this... live... Please handle this with care and really consider me invested in helping. But don't forget this issue, please.

Yes, but fuel burn remains at 4x. It's been raised countless times here and each time the team are "taking it away for review", yet nothing ever happens and they claim it's because no system can handle more than 4x. I don't know why it's seemingly so hard to add native support for 8x or even 16x sim rate with correct fuel burn. I'm not using the A350 as a result, I just don't have the time to fly 3 hours to do a 12 hour flight. Miraculously, I can use the PMDG 777 at 16x without a single issue - so not sure if I somehow have the only PC in the world that can run more than 4x?!

Good day First of all i want to thank you for the great experience that is the a320neo v2? I really enjoy flying it and already spent lots of hours trying out different flights. However, i can not seem to find out on how to get a ground marshaller guiding me in upon taxiing to the destination gate. This is strange, because when i do the exact same steps with the standard a320 that comes with fs2020 he always shows up guiding me at the gate. Some specifications: I don't use any other 3d parties addons (like GSX) airport used (with both planes): EBBR I always use default in game ATC, also to request "taxi to gates" after landing I tried to set the destination gate trough the fs2020 planning window, with or without.....still marshaller doesn't show up. Now when i do the exact same with the default, no problem, marshall appears. Is there some script or config file that can be adjusted to have this also working when using the inibuilds a320 v2? I will be happy to hear from you. Any tips are welcome (though i already tried a lot of them probably) Thanks!

It would be nice to see more Airports or already existing ones like Frankfurt or Munich, because there are is not much variatey of Airports to chose. If you would do already existing ones like Frankfurt or Munich you could consider making the new Terminals too.

I was able to find information corroborating your statement here within the Safety Airbus Website as I agree with this being the case as it's something I've been told before, what I had logged was regarding Deselecting SLS, I still am working on keyboard clarity when addressing multiple issues in one post; https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/lets-use-xls/?airbus-iframe=true&airbus-post=2048

Did you already start your engines before pushback?

GlassOut fixed the ini pop-out clustering. This is going to replace the std MSFS pop-out.

I think the brake temperature is behaving quite realistically in the current version (1.26). It is quite normal to have a BRAKES HOT ECAM after landing/parking. It's a heavy aircraft and those brakes have to absorb a lot of energy, which will eventually turn into heat. It could well take 5-10 minutes after landing before they reach their highest temperature. Also make sure you use the correct technique when braking: You should avoid multiple brake applications and instead prefer one smooth brake application to bring the speed down.

Hi, First of all, the A350 does not have a FINAL, APP NAV or FINAL APP modes. Please do not implement these. Unlike in the older Airbuses, FLS is installed by default in the A350 and it is used for RNP approaches with LNAV/VNAV and LNAV minimas. It can also create an "ILS-like" indication for some LOC and VOR approaches. As Adrian said, when you press the DESELECT SLS button, it should give you the FLS indication so that you can fly an RNP approach with LNAV/VNAV or LNAV minima. Now it seems to give you the vertical guidance of the APP DES mode, which is only meant for the RNP AR approaches. In the current version, it looks like the FLS is only available for those RNP approach procedures, which do not have a LPV SBAS approach associated with them. This is how it looks like at the moment. This approach (EDDH RNP 23) has LPV, LNAV/VNAV and LNAV approaches in the same procedure. The default is LPV (flown with SLS). When you press the DESELECT SLS button, it brings up the vertical guidance of the APP DES mode (in the screenshot). This is the FLS indication (the double diamonds) you should get after pressing the DESELECT SLS button:

I've seen it requested elsewhere but the focus of replies has been relating to liveries being added... For those that want to paint their own (for themselves or a VA that won't be covered by an "official" paint), we're kionda stuck at the moment as the "paintkits" available on flightsim.to don't match the 2024 version of the aircraft. Can we please get a paintkit to allow people to bring more to the party with this aircraft, even if it's just PSDs with the wireframe (something for Blender would be appreciated however!).

Logged for the team

Logged for the team

Should be an option if implemented. Even on modern aircraft like the Airbus most US operators display all temperatures in Celsius except the cabin temp which is usually shown in Fahrenheit.

I think that regardless of whether you import the waypoints including SIDs/STARs or without that, when you import waypoints into the INS from the PFB, that the last waypoint loaded should always be the destination airport and not the final waypoint in the flight plan. Once you hit that waypoint there is still valuable information to be gained from the distance and time to the destination that are displayed, and I am quite certain that all crews of L1011s fitted with INSes would have done the same. You can do it yourself manually, of course, but then that defeats the purpose of using the autoimport.

Everything is working fine with GSX until it comes time to push. When the operator asks to release break the plane run into the terminal. I usually pump the parking break until it stops. When it happens in the beginning of the push it's certain it will happend at the end, when I pause the sim and restart coault. At GSX they say it's from IniBuild side!

SimBrief fuel imports still seem to be resulting in a displayed 400 lb imbalance. See attached screenshots. The SimBrief OFP has a total fuel amount of 120.0k lbs which is shown in the PFD. However, once loaded, the fuel totalizer only shows 119.6k lbs, and when I add up the fuel shown on the individual tank gauges, I only see a little over 116k lbs of fuel on board.

See attached screenshot. This was after running unattended at cruise for nearly 4 hours with all crossfeeds open and all pumps on. I am not using the PFD fuel balance helper (which also appears to not be working correctly, but that's a topic for a different post). In my screenshot I've turned all pumps off but the tank 3 and 2R pumps to even out first the small imbalance in 2R and then I will try to burn tank 3 down.

I'll bring this up to the team if there is any update