All Activity

This is exaclty what happens with every Inbuilds aircraft, and it´s something happening of the late 6 months or so. I have flown their products for years, including the A350 since the beginning and nothing like this happened before. At least with the A350, if you have the autosave enacted, you can restart the sim after the freeze, spawn into any airport, and then click on the last iteration of the autosave. It works quite well, it will take you back to the last situation saved, including flight plan loaded, possition, altitude etc. To tell you guys the truth, I have been avoiding Inibuilds aircraft lately, and resorted back to using the very reliable PMDG 777, since that´s what I like to do, long haul sectors. Until something´s done about I will keep avoiding Inubuilds products, which is a shame because they used to be my favorite.

still cant remove the gps like on the ys-11 innit

First time using the in-game editor, for me. The scenery jumped more than one position up the list with one click of the arrow but it did the trick. Many thanks!

The pitch is also very sensitive. I really want to love this plane however it has some really annoying problems

If you get stuck let me know

I was also banned from Discord because criticism is unwelcome.

Your token can be grabbed for discord so you don't know its compromised then perform all the spam bot actions. So no, there's no 'it wasn't compromised' contact support again if you want to get to the bottom of it. After all most of the staff here do not at all touch discord related stuff.

Even when starting up just engine 1 and 4 after pushback, I always end up below the minimum takeoff fuel level before reaching the runway. Either the fuel burn is too high, or more taxi fuel needs to be applied to the Simbrief profile. This is especially an issue when taxiing at huge airports like ZSPD.

A lot of the services still aren't being called automatically, though, like the fuel truck.

The fuel truck attachment point is inside the wing instead of just forward where the panel opens up. Sorry for the photo size, but my quota says I can only upload a 12.07 kb file.

Thanks very much, Jamir. I've just been getting frustrated because, at this point, the flight model is the biggest reason why I don't fly the TriStar regularly. Your words give me hope, though.

Thank you for these detailed posts, I'll get this logged for our team, thank you :)

Yes, suggestions have been passed along to the team including a master list that was made back in May. Thank you :)

Hello, Many of these items are still works in progress, I understand the frustrations seeing other updates ship items less focused on the FM, Nav Logic, etc. However... That is not to say that work isn't being done on said items but if we only updated our aircraft with key items instead of whatever work was already complete then there wouldn't be updates depending on how long one or two specific items take while holding back other smaller fixes that are still needed. Rest assured these items are in progress and have not been forgotten. Thank you for understanding :)

MISSING - At the far edge of stands 90-93, there is an area for ground service equipment to be placed. In the scenery, it just stops at the service road.

MISSING - Between stands 92 & 93, there is a road that goes both ways. With this, stands will need rearranging though due to space, so I understand it's quite a bit of work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06H39DZzRRA - Time: 5:47

MISSING - From stand 91, at the back, there is a service road that ramps up to lead to the stands 20-23. The concrete wall 90* turns and follows down the service road to the D1 holding point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UjO6be3K5Q - Time: 7:36 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06H39DZzRRA - Time: 6:15

MISSING - Near the Fire station, there is a road with markings that goes from stand 20 over to the fire station and round the back.

MISSING - I understand this is quite hard to add due to no aerial imagery, but it's not something you haven't done before... Luton has now expanded the Engine Run-up Bay, and added 5 new stands on there. A6W, A6E, 101, 102 & 103. Although it's in construction here, you can see the work and how big the bay is now with the stands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWLxDu8X878 - Time: 3:42

Hello, I thank you for updating Luton however, there are still quite a few bits and bobs that are outstanding with the scenery that would help with GSX profiles and add a bit more realism to the airport. These mainly focus around the 'Engine Run-up Bay' and around stands 20-23 & 90-93. Understandably, when you guys made the scenery, stands 90-93 were new and I'm sure getting proper imagery wasn't perfect... (And with that, please excuse my wonderful photos, if you like them you can put them to the fridge 😁) - All aerial imagery is with Google Earth. V1.1.0 BUG - There seems to be an LOD issue with a bit of the DART rails by runway 07. From far away, it's visible but up close it's not.

Not forgetting the GSE area at the back of the 90's, and the ramp road that goes up to the 20's which are visible in this image too...

I'll pass this along to the team, thank you.

I tend to agree. Things like engine parameters, VNAV Control and Logic and flight model don't seem to fall into any news cycle. I understand the Tristar was a cheaper aircraft brought out by ini, but I figured it's because complex FMC calculations, BTV, systems, etc. etc. don't need to be modelled. I hope they prove me wrong and finish the product they started.

Just to confirm, are either of you using RexAtmos when flying in the sim?

Do you have Photogrammetry enabled as well as other steps listed below: