All Activity

Hi, I'm honestly stumped, as now I am also having the same issue on my end after updating to SU6. I will speak to the team for further clarification. Thanks!

Hmmm...still seeing the pink textures. I've also performed a clean install of MSFS2024. Only thing loaded is Navigraph, PMDG 737 and iniBuilds KDFW airport. I reordered it to near the top at this point. Nothing seems to be working.

Hi, Yes, that would be correct. If moving it up one or two slots doesn’t resolve the issue, try moving it closer to the top of your reorder list. Thanks!

Correct! I edited the post after realizing it had been released publicly. Great to hear that a fresh install worked! Thanks for your feedback!

Hi André, We’re happy to have passionate users like you taking the time to provide such detailed suggestions. Thank you for your continued feedback! I’ll make sure to take note of your suggestions and pass them along to the team for future evaluation. Thank you!

Hi everyone, Thanks for your patience on this matter. I can confirm that this has been logged on our end, and I’ll push for an immediate fix based on your requests. Thanks for taking the time to share your suggestions and feedback. We really appreciate it! Thanks!

Hi, The multi-jetway tool should work with some third-party aircraft, especially those that have specific code alignment and door layout data, which the 777 does. This would explain why it “kind of” works when you pull forward past the parking spot markers. If you were to test this with any of the iniBuilds widebody aircraft, you should see the aircraft parked correctly at the designated parking stand markings. Hope this helps! Thanks!

Hi ini, is there any update on this? I'd love to buy the scenery but can't do that if you are unwilling to fix it. I mean I could buy it and then use the scenery editor to fix it myself. But that would be a rather bad deal for me. Please fix the vegetation, it was reported broken 3 months ago. Thank you!

I think the reason you being sent to the Discord is because this is a Synaptic issue. Not an Inibuilds direct issue. You have to remember Synaptic is the dev team with Inibuilds involvement.

Thank you for the help. I’ll try that 🇨🇦 👍

Hi, Thanks for attaching the screenshots, I will forward these to the team for futher investigation. Thanks again for your time! I will update this thread when I get a response from the team.

v1.1.0 of iniBuilds London Gatwick (EGKK) for MSFS 2024 has been released. This update introduces the new Multi-Jetway System at Gates 558/559, adds Taxiway Link E and updated IHPs with accompanying signage, and improves taxiway pathing and offset-threshold behaviour for ATC and AI traffic. This update can be downloaded via the iniManager. v1.1.0Added multi jetway system [Gate 558/9] Added taxiway LINK E and signage Added new/changed IHPs (MARLO, JACKA, N2, P2, Q2, R2) and signage Taxiway paths have been decluttered to help with ATC/AI pathing Taxiway/runway entries on offset thresholds should now show correct behaviour

Thanks, Rob! We have received reports of the map server not initializing properly when installed through iniManager, and we are currently investigating the issue on our side. In the meantime, I would suggest downloading the map server files directly from the Synaptic website, as we know this method works. Note: After downloading the files, the map server should launch automatically. However, we have occasionally seen cases where the auto-launch is unsuccessful. If this happens, simply launch the map-server file from the downloaded folder manually, and that should resolve the issue. Thanks!

Hi, We haven’t received any other reports of similar behavior. If you’re able to, could you load back into the same gate and try opening the EFB again? Thanks!

I used the install from ini manager

Are you using the install from the iniManager, or did you download the map files directly from the Synaptic website? Thanks!

Hi, I’m sorry to hear you’re having issues with the installer on Mac. I personally don’t have a Mac, so I’m unable to test this myself, but I’ll pass this along to a team member who may be able to assist. Thank you for your patience. I’ll update you here once I receive a response from the team. Thanks again!

Hi Kyle, I do not get a console window when I load the sim. When I first install it should I use the a220-launcher.exe or map-server.exe?

Hi, Thank you very much for providing this feedback. I’ll make note of it and pass it along to the team for further investigation. Thanks again!

Hi everyone, As this issue appears to have been resolved, I will now close the thread. Thank you all for taking the time to share your opinions, provide feedback, and help troubleshoot the issue. We really appreciate your time and assistance. Thanks!

Hi Rob, When you launch the sim, do you get a windows console window that pops up? I haven’t personally experienced any issues with this, although there are times when I need to close and relaunch the map-server software. Thanks!

Hi everyone, Apologies for the late reply. I’ve taken note of your concerns and suggestions and will forward them to the team for review. We are continually working on the A350 and, as I’m sure you’re aware, v2 is currently in development. Your feedback and suggestions will help us continue to improve the product and make it an even better experience for everyone. We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback with us. Thanks!

I would like the map server to automatically load when the sim starts. In the instruction It says that it should modify the exe.xml, But it hasn't done that.

I confirm that this has been fixed after SU6!

Hi, after yesterdays SU6 the A330 is not longer usable for me (on long-haul). If I increase the sim rate to 4x the plane starts oscillation violently left and right of the track, zig-zaging its way towards destination. In the last built before SU5 increasing sim-rate to 4x was not an issue at all. I had a flight with TFDIs MD-11 in SU6 so far and here the 4x sim rate made no problem at all. Hence, I suppose it is the plane rather then the simulator? Thanks.