All Activity

Excellent news!

The GTA 6 comparison doesn't hold up, but I get the underlying point that PS5 players just want some acknowledgement. AzrYN said it well: it's not personal toward iniKyle. A brief status note, even saying there's nothing firm to share yet, would do more than silence. Being left in the dark is what wears people down, not the delay itself.

All three running on the same AIRAC version 2611. Søren

I was referring to the situation in which there is no magenta dot at a waypoint with a speed restriction below the LIM SPD, as shown in the videos I attached.

I second this! @iniKyle thank you for putting up with our complaints lol. We promise we’ll be nice now, but maybe a little bit of affirmation would be nice for us PS5 players? Again, appreciate your engagement

You think a developer doesn’t care about their own product anymore, because a different product from a whole other company in a whole different genre will be released later this month? Really?

I think even the developers at inibuilds don’t care about the A380 anymore, because they are so excited about GTA 6 releasing soon. The whole world is focused and hyped up about this one game. The world as we know it, won’t be the same after November 19.

As I know, no official date has been announced yet. Just keep waiting.

@iniKyle , just wanted to say that none of our frustration is directed at you personally. We appreciate you taking the time to answer our questions. We’re just tired of being left in the dark and not knowing what’s happening with the PS5 releases. We understand that not everything is in your hands, but we really hope you understand where we’re coming from. Nothing personal at all, and thanks for your replies!

.

And honestly, what happened to the A350? When MSFS first launched on PS5 around December, the A350 was one of the aircraft everyone was talking about and hoping to see on PlayStation. But now that the A380 has become the main topic, it feels like the A350 has simply been forgotten. Are there still plans to bring it to PS5, or has it been put aside? We’d really appreciate an honest answer about its situation too.

Honestly, this whole situation is getting ridiculous. PS5 players have been waiting for more iniBuilds aircraft since the launch of MSFS, and we’re still getting vague answers with no real information. At this point, it’s hard not to wonder whether Microsoft and Asobo are deliberately making things more difficult for PlayStation users. Xbox players have already had access to aircraft like the A380, while PS5 players are still waiting and being told to just be patient. If there are technical or certification issues, then explain them. If Microsoft or Asobo are holding things back, then at least be transparent about it. What we don’t appreciate is being left in the dark for months while other platforms continue to receive content. We’re customers too. We paid for the simulator just like everyone else, and we deserve the same level of communication and consideration. We don’t want another vague response telling us to stay tuned. We want actual answers about what’s happening behind the scenes and whether aircraft like the A350 are genuinely coming to PS5.

The point about saying the submission is with Microsoft/Asobo's review is the practical one. If that's where it sits, a plain "no timeline until they finish review" tells PS5 players everything they need. "Internal discussions" sounds like something is still being decided on iniBuilds' end, which is a different situation entirely. Clarity about which side holds the next step matters more than reassurance here.

When I compare the ON and OFF settings, I start the aircraft in a cold and dark state each time. I then follow the normal procedures step by step until pushback is completed, ready to taxi.

What is the optimal location for the nav lights?

Ini's development team probably needs to take more practical action instead of blaming Microsoft.

The temporary-versus-permanent distinction you raised is worth pinning down early, since it changes how a request should be framed. If it's a community livery pack, the lead-time argument matters less, because repainters can work at their own pace rather than waiting on an official release schedule. A Christmas 707 would work well with the classic livery style, but I'd check the official MSFS forums first to see whether a seasonal request has been raised before, so interest isn't split across threads.

The temporary-versus-permanent distinction you raised is worth pinning down early, since it changes how a request should be framed. If it's a community livery pack, the lead-time argument matters less, because repainters can work at their own pace rather than waiting on an official release schedule. A Christmas 707 would work well with the classic livery style, but I'd check the official MSFS forums first to see whether a seasonal request has been raised before, so interest isn't split across threads.

Sorry, @spottersim . I just have time to try the Magenta Dot just know. In the picture below, I can confirm that the Magenta Dot is there, as long as the Speed Limit is THERE. As you can see, the Magenta Dot P/W is there, placed and ready to be hit. So it is properly simulated during climb and descend. But for @iniKyle , like I said on the post above, there's a problem whenever we select speed, the Magenta Dot P/W is lost, see the pictures below: On PFD, the Magenta Dot IS THERE on the Speed Tape, but it is LOST when we do Selected Speed, so the sequencing IS THE PROBLEM now. Even after selecting Managed Speed, the Magenta Dot P/W STILL LOST eventhough it hasn't hit the FL100 threshold OR Climbing after level-off. And that caused the Managed Climb feature was also lost and revert to OpenClimb mode due to CRZ ALT on CDU is lost (required to reentry the CRZ ALT because of that). BTW, I am using the V1.0.7 as for references.

Sorry, for some reason my text isn't being accepted here like it is for other users—how strange! Today, I loaded up MSFS 2024 with the iniBuilds A380 at KJFK, Gate A6, at night. Everything went fine during the aircraft setup; I even used the Multi-Jetway tool, and the jetway worked perfectly. Later, before requesting pushback via GSX, I called the Multi-Jetway tool again to have the jetway retract. Suddenly, the sim froze, and I had to close it using Task Manager. I restarted my PC and tried the same flight plan again, but when I called the Multi-Jetway tool and selected the jetway, the sim froze once more. What should I do now?Sorry, for some reason my text isn't being accepted here like it is for other users—how strange! Today, I loaded up MSFS 2024 with the iniBuilds A380 at KJFK, Gate A6, at night. Everything went fine during the aircraft setup; I even used the Multi-Jetway tool, and the jetway worked perfectly. Later, before requesting pushback via GSX, I called the Multi-Jetway tool again to have the jetway retract. Suddenly, the sim froze, and I had to close it using Task Manager. I restarted my PC and tried the same flight plan again, but when I called the Multi-Jetway tool and selected the jetway, the sim froze once more. What should I do now?

iniKyle's statement is at least clear about what he can't share, and that's fair — but nathanlewis has a point that 'internal discussions' reads as vague when the earlier submission update is already known. If the submission is genuinely with Microsoft/Asobo's review process, saying so plainly is enough; PS5 players can set expectations themselves. I'd rather see a short, honest 'no timeline' than repeated requests for patience that come across as dismissive. Either way, the aircraft's status is what it is until the platform side moves.

iniKyle's statement is at least clear about what he can't share, and that's fair — but nathanlewis has a point that 'internal discussions' reads as vague when the earlier submission update is already known. If the submission is genuinely with Microsoft/Asobo's review process, saying so plainly is enough; PS5 players can set expectations themselves. I'd rather see a short, honest 'no timeline' than repeated requests for patience that come across as dismissive. Either way, the aircraft's status is what it is until the platform side moves.

iniKyle's statement is at least clear about what he can't share, and that's fair — but nathanlewis has a point that 'internal discussions' reads as vague when the earlier submission update is already known. If the submission is genuinely with Microsoft/Asobo's review process, saying so plainly is enough; PS5 players can set expectations themselves. I'd rather see a short, honest 'no timeline' than repeated requests for patience that come across as dismissive. Either way, the aircraft's status is what it is until the platform side moves.

let’s hope for this month at least. btw gta 6 will save me so yeah

Let's hope it's not next summer then