All Activity

*Update Everything seems to be working as intended on my side.

Thanks Ed, I'll check this on my end. Thanks for your patience!

Shift C would put you in walkaround mode I believe, by default.

Hi Jez, Are you based in the UK? I could reach out to some of the team to see if anyone would be able to send one over. Thanks!

Hello, I noticed that that MFD/NAV display freezes frequently during all phases of flight. The only fix is to cycle out to external views and then back in to the cockpit. Not a huge issue, but something to note for the next update. I am using the latest version of MSFS2024. Thank you.

Hi Gungnir This calculation its been done based on numbers from the testflights before it got the redy to go from the gowerments. Waigth temprature Wind QNH Runway slope Runway attidue All this listed things have inbact on the take off performence including terain around the Airport. It have no point to take off if the aircraft not are able to climb above high tarain. (a fix in the SID) Exs: D543 at 3200ft ore above. In the earlig days the crew used tabels to calculate this take off settings. Today computers inside the aircraft own systems, ore on a tablet in the cocpit are used. Your finding between using LBS ws KG its intresting. I am prety sure the your results on the OIS when using LBS is more likly the corect one.

Hi all, I attended FSimUK 2026 with my son and we both thoroughly enjoyed it. He picked up a lanyard on the iniBuilds stand but unfortunately I broke it by accident. I feel really bad! Does anyone have a spare that they could send to me please? Happy to pay for postage. Thanks, Jez

Good morning, Tried to send FPLAN from the EFB to he Avionic but nothing happen. Thanks frank_m...some other idea?

In standard cockpit camera view or drone camera view? W, A, S, D only work in drone view and has to be used with the shift key in cockpit camera view in my setup. Søren

Hi Kyle, 556-557. I got then working and discovered it was due to an outdated livery. However just now the issue has come back- it’s not very consistent. Cheers, Ed.

When loading a saved situation (specifically on the runway ready for takeoff), the aircraft spawns on the runway on its tail pitching up. ECAM TAIL STRIKE appears. I am able to place the aircraft properly with SLEW function, but the ECAM remains, unable to reset it.

Can you tell if the support for MCDU hardware, like wincntrl MCDU, is finally part of the update?

Yes, this is a common issue that started fairly recently (not sure if it was SU7 or before). Sometimes (maybe every 3 times?) printing the loadsheet makes the other sounds mute. Switching to external view and back again makes it normal again.

Thank you very much for your response and for forwarding my suggestion to the team! I really appreciate your time and consideration. As a real-world pilot, I am very excited about the Global 6000 and would love to see it become an even more realistic and immersive experience. Although I do not currently fly the Global 6000, my real-world experience includes turboprop operations with the Cessna Caravan and Beechcraft King Air, performing medical transport flights as well as executive and government authority transportation. I believe this operational background could be useful when providing feedback on cockpit procedures, systems, and overall flight simulation realism. I will also share a link to some manuals and documentation related to the real Global 6000, in case they may be helpful during development, systems implementation, or beta testing. I would also like to offer my help as a beta tester, should the opportunity arise. I would be happy to contribute my aviation experience, test the aircraft, report issues, and provide constructive feedback to help improve the final product. Thank you again for listening to the community and for all the work your team is doing. I am really looking forward to the release of the Global 6000! https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1mXdbvg9oY8nyYt8QVdAGW7AO-fPeJ4ub

Thanks for your feedback! I will forward this to team for further consideration. Thanks again!

Feature Request: Shared Cockpit for the iniBuilds Global 6000 First of all, congratulations to the iniBuilds team on the development of the Global 6000. I am really looking forward to flying this aircraft in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024. As a real-world pilot, I would like to request native Shared Cockpit functionality, allowing two pilots to operate the same aircraft together in a fully synchronized environment. For me, flight simulation is more than entertainment. It is also an opportunity to learn, improve procedures, and share aviation experiences with fellow pilots. I would love to fly the Global 6000 with my pilot friends, assigning realistic Pilot Flying (PF) and Pilot Monitoring (PM) roles while practicing Crew Resource Management (CRM) and Multi-Crew Cooperation (MCC) principles. Shared cockpit support would allow us to practice crew coordination, communication, decision-making, checklists, standard operating procedures, and workload management throughout all phases of flight. Ideally, both pilots should be able to interact with synchronized flight controls, avionics, switches, and aircraft systems, creating a realistic two-pilot experience from preflight preparation to shutdown. I understand that implementing this functionality can be technically challenging. However, I believe it would add tremendous value to the aircraft, especially for real-world pilots and aviation enthusiasts who want to experience realistic crew operations with their friends. Although flight simulation cannot replace approved professional training, it can be a valuable environment for procedural practice and reinforcing CRM skills. Please consider adding native Shared Cockpit support, either at release or in a future update. It would make the Global 6000 even more immersive and would be a major reason for many of us to choose this aircraft. Thank you for your time and for considering this

Exactly and like ET-BAY and ET-BAZ

Hi, I believe the A350 v2 will enherit the A380 tech for hiding the cabin when door is closed. I will verify this with the team. Thanks!

Hi! The A380, I learn, has a performance mode which unloads the cabin unless the cockpit door is open -- an excellent idea. The 350 also has a Performance mode, but having tested it by opening the cockpit door while looking at the vram allocation and frame times, I don't think it unloads the cabin. 1) is that correct? What does it hide then? 2) What are the odds of 350 inheriting that tech (cabin unloaded when door closed) from the 380 in v2 or 1.2.7? I'm sure it would give us a nice boost. Thanks!

Hi, Thanks for your inquiry. I will forward this to the team for further clarification. Thanks for your patience!

Hi, I will note this for the team. Thanks!

Hi Ini team I tried every combination of potential icing weather scenarios and was unable to achieve any visible icing effects what so ever. i got one very brief engine icing warning on the ecam which soon disappeared even though i did not turn on the engine icing switches on the over head, despite still being in icing conditions. Is this a bug and can you confirm that icing effects are modelled in to both the systems and the graphics side, ice build up on windows and other areas etc?. Im not talking about the separate ice and snow feature that can be independently selected in the efb and does show ice on the wings and fuse if i use the slider. thank you

Good day I noticed that parking this plane never spawns a ground marshaller at the gate. I tried with fs2022 default a320 and fbw which went ok. Is it possible to have this fixzd for a320neo v2?

I find quite large differences between the Simbrief tool and the OIS tool too. Here is QNH 1013, 15 degrees and no wind with TOW = 280 T and CONF 1 forced, giving 10 kts difference for the same configuration. I have no clue which one is more accurate though, or how much arbitrariness is included in this. I would guess that the reason the aircraft does not do its own calculations (it's up to the airline/crew) is because there are many reasonable answers to the question. Speaking of arbitrariness, switching the weight unit to 1000x lbs (and changing nothing else) gives very different results (a bug I found reported here but not acknowledged): So something, at least, is broken.

I made a boeing bulletin board