All Activity

Hi @IniSteve - this seems like a relatively easy fix to swap these nodes. Do we know if it's likely to happen soon? AI trying to route via the above taxiways doesn't make it, making 08R departures a bit of a mess. Did we also work out what is actually changed with the BGL's switched with the 'North Runway Active?' The BeyondATC Discord is frequently seeing people raise issues with AI and debugging confirms these nodes not linking to the right runway (or that the runway in the nodes isn't correct!) is playing up. Seems to be quite a bit of disapointment with the quality of the ini product if something quite simple as renaming the runway in the node data is still left to be fixed over 2 months later from when I demonstrated the issue.

I've passed this along to the team, a video would still be very helpful if one can be added, if not I can try to get one tomorrow myself. Thank you

As jetsetuk said, I have the same issue. I did a couple patters trying different techniques including button pressed and illuminated, as well as NOT pressed and lights not illuminated. I can only manually deploy the spoilers in the air (speed brake). Once I touch down, nothing happens, regardless of thrust reverse or not…also, on touchdown, manual deployment using key bind doesn’t work. The ONLY way I can deploy spoilers after touchdown is to use the mouse and physically drag the spoiler lever. interesting note, after engine start, right before taxi on my control surface checks, the keybind works for deployment of the spoilers. 🤷‍♂️ really hoping this can be pushed towards the top of the priority list for the next update.

I'll pass this along to the team, thank you 🙂

Are you able to send a video of the below issue happening? Either a google drive link or youtube will work. Thank you

Hi Inibuilds, not yet had chance to fly the new update for the A350 but I will give it a good flight tomorrow. I've just noticed that the 2 buttons when clicked don't have a animation , I realise its not a biggie but thought I'd report it to you Video :

There is a click spot on the Radar Altimeter to the right of the ADI that will extinguish the DH lamp.

FO side clock hour hand is black under instrument light with no flood lighting And if you click by the label on the FWS CARGO COMPARTMENT extinguisher guards, the label disappears never to return. The guards work fine. Example below shows one missing after clicking. All the other guards seem fine.

On my last flight v1.0.2 the capt side decision light was permanently on.

I follow the manuals instructions so the lights are not illuminated on the spoiler lever. And still I get no spoilers on landing with reverse thrust or rejected take off. As the other users state DLC works fine and I can move the spoilers with my bindings, plus they cause no other issues on any other aircraft including the inibuild a340. I look forward to a resolution

Issues regarding the panel states are known

Hi, just to verify, when being fully configured to land and then subsequently landing does not automatically deploy spoilers unless you press the button which is actually designed to disarm them? Can you upload a video either on google drive or youtube so I can see just to make sure I got it right, thank you

Hi Seems like V1.0.3 is unusable for me. The ON APU or READY FOR TAKEOFF panel states don't work as they seem to stall and get stuck around "APU initialisation" or "waiting for RPM target", before it times out. Am I doing anything wrong? Was looking forward to the fixes in 1.0.3. and rather disappointed I cannot even start from an easy state...

Good afternoon I don't know if this question has been asked before, and if so, I apologize for asking it again. Seeing what inibuilds has recreated in the past, with their work on the A340 and A350, which continue to be updated, adding new features and making corrections, ultimately evolving the product, I would like to know if there are plans, or at least if it's being considered, to develop an A330. The A330 shares systems with the A340, even a very similar structure; they share the fuselage and wings, with modifications, for example, to the landing gear or the engine pods. It seems strange that, having developed an A340, they couldn't develop an A330 based on it, knowing that they would share common elements, meaning at least part of it would already be done. I know that there is a recreation of the A330 in the simulator, which, for a package aircraft, is quite complete. In fact, I was surprised by how much interactivity it had compared to other package aircraft that ASOBO and Microsoft developed. I know that Ini developed this aircraft for them, and that they cannot upgrade it themselves, but I understand that they would have total freedom to develop one that would do justice to the A330. A version of the -200 and -300 model with the P2F variant, similar to the work done on the A300, would surely provide many flight hours for the sim flight community. Is it possible, then, that an A330 could be developed? Have the developers at IniBuilds considered this possibility? That's all, greetings

Aircraft: A300-600 PW Simulator: FS2024 Version: Inimanager latest a300 Navdata Method: NAVIGRAPH OFP: attached WASM Error: WASM: Error during Systems_gauge_update execution. Error code : 0xc0000005 WASM: Module vfs://inibuilds-aircraft-a300/SimObjects/Airplanes/A300-600/attachments/inibuilds/Function_Interior_Passenger/panel/inibuilds-A300.wasm is now dirty Specs: AMD RYZEN 7 7800X3D, ASUS DUAL RADEON RX 9060 XT, Crucial 32GB DDR5-6000 KIT Autosave File: Please include the latest ".bin" autosave file prior to your crash. Step 9. Where possible, include on your report I was editing my approach runway. Cant share autosave as directory explained is not showing any autosave: BR, Robin EDDFEFOU_PDF_1776875737.12974a46.pdf

As there is no update here, and probably never will be, I advise anyone with this problem to download muxp and create a correctly profiled version of the runway based on published elevation data.

Xbox Series X

iniBuilds A350 Airliner V1.2.5 Update 🚀 The A350 Airliner v1.2.5 update focuses on further refining system accuracy and improving overall stability, with a continued emphasis on WASM performance and consistency. Following extensive testing, the team have implemented a range of under-the-hood optimisations to memory handling, data efficiency, and system robustness within the MSFS WASM environment, resulting in smoother operation and more reliable behaviour, particularly during complex and high-load scenarios. Alongside these core improvements, this update delivers a comprehensive set of fixes across key aircraft systems, addressing areas such as FMGS logic, flight guidance behaviour, navigation predictions, and MCDU functionality. Additional updates span across the EFB, sounds, and aircraft model, resolving issues with enroute mapping, missing alerts, and various animation and visual discrepancies, helping ensure a more polished and consistent experience throughout all phases of flight. We’re excited to say that after considerable work and a strong focus on improving overall WASM stability, the team have implemented a range of under-the-hood optimisations throughout the latest testing phase. Many of our testers have already reported noticeable improvements in performance and consistency, particularly in more demanding scenarios. These changes target memory handling, data efficiency, and system robustness within the MSFS WASM environment, helping deliver a much more stable experience overall. Here's what we've done: Optimised WASM performance and memory handling by reducing unnecessary data copying in key systems, lowering transient memory usage and improving overall efficiency within the MSFS WASM environment. Refined data access patterns to reduce unnecessary temporary copies, helping lower stack pressure and improve runtime consistency, particularly during high-load scenarios Added additional safety checks across critical memory pathways to guard against invalid states and edge cases As mentioned above, these changes significantly improve overall stability and reduce the likelihood of WASM-related crashes, so be sure to download the latest updates, especially ahead of a busy Cross The Pond, coming this weekend! This update can be downloaded via the iniManager. V1.2.5 SYSTEMS ⚙️ FIXED Position time manual behaviour FIXED Direct to behaviour FIXED Fix page issue FIXED Issue with Top of climb prediction FIXED TO page not locking in fields when TO phase active FIXED Fuel & load page FIXED The aircraft GW & GWCG should be calculated/shown on the ED/PERMANENT DATA FIXED ALT CSTR on ND FIXED Issues with making waypoint-bearing FIXED Deleting pilot waypoints selection exceeds the remaining number if waypoints FIXED T/C marker missing in OP CLB FIXED Altitude selection & flight phase logic during cruise FIXED Green dot speed mismatch FIXED "NOISE END" box appears on top of the previous "SPD CSTR" FIXED FD Behaviour - Vertical Guidance Timing & Wind Shift Sensitivity ART 🎨 FIXED some bolts & other small parts are missing from the landing gear, & some are not attached to anything FIXED APPR button not animated FIXED EVA command guard does not open FIXED Ext Model - Sun shades are mounted on exterior window instead of the interior ones FIXED Rudder trim animation inverted EFB📱 FIXED Enroute map token loss in flight FIXED Enroute map 403 error due to bad API call SOUNDS🔊 FIXED Missing "retard" callout FIXED No windshear alert iniBuilds Team ❤️

iniBuilds A340 Airliner V1.0.11 Update 🚀 The A340 Airliner v1.0.11 update brings a strong focus on overall stability and performance within the MSFS WASM environment, alongside a range of targeted fixes across core aircraft systems. Following extensive internal work and testing, this update introduces under-the-hood improvements to memory handling, data efficiency, and system robustness, resulting in noticeably improved consistency, particularly during high-load and demanding scenarios. In addition to these foundational enhancements, this update addresses several system-level issues affecting day-to-day operations, including corrections to flight deck indications, trim and hydraulic logic, navigation behaviour, and MCDU interactions. Together, these changes help deliver a more stable, predictable, and refined experience across all phases of flight, with a reduced likelihood of WASM-related instability. We’re excited to say that after considerable work and a strong focus on improving overall WASM stability, the team have implemented a range of under-the-hood optimisations throughout the latest testing phase. Many of our testers have already reported noticeable improvements in performance and consistency, particularly in more demanding scenarios. These changes target memory handling, data efficiency, and system robustness within the MSFS WASM environment, helping deliver a much more stable experience overall. Here's what we've done: Optimised WASM performance and memory handling by reducing unnecessary data copying in key systems, lowering transient memory usage and improving overall efficiency within the MSFS WASM environment. Refined data access patterns to reduce unnecessary temporary copies, helping lower stack pressure and improve runtime consistency, particularly during high-load scenarios Added additional safety checks across critical memory pathways to guard against invalid states and edge cases As mentioned above, these changes significantly improve overall stability and reduce the likelihood of WASM-related crashes, so be sure to download the latest updates, especially ahead of a busy Cross The Pond, coming this weekend! This update can be downloaded via the iniManager. V1.0.11SYSTEMS ⚙️ FIXED Deviation indication when no course tuned in VOR FIXED Trim can be moved without hydraulic pressure FIXED Issues with clearing scratchpad FIXED Fix page formatting issues FIXED Manually tuned navaids not resetting after landing FIXED THS should be +4 deviation on cold and dark load iniBuilds Team ❤️

FYI I have a thread over here on this same issue. Maybe if we keep pestering we will get a list of LVars!

Looks like GPS jamming, you can disable this feature in OIS menu if you like

ok please let me know if theres is any fixes to this

Hi all, i don't understand this problem ! Help please !

Hi, Sorry as sometimes life keeps us busy. We are working on a build now with refinements to our Auto Pilot and Flight Modeling. I don't have an estimated time for a delivery as of yet, but work is being done. Thank you for patience 🙂

Thanks team is working on pressurisation system/controller related issues.