All Activity

Same here. I updated it thinking the situation had already been addressed, but no… another week with this problem. I understand the aircraft reacts to the wind; that’s why at higher altitude it turns slowly, but on the ground not so much.

Also the "100 above and minimums" callouts are different to all the other callouts, sounds like two different planes are mixed.

Wow did you got this free? this product cost over 80 CAD$ Yes all is necessary at this price point!

@LineDXThe tone was wrong, it's only the quality that is the issue, it'll be fixed in due time.

Just got the update with today’s marketplace. Unfortunately, the problem persists, still no rotation of the fan blades when the engines are running.

I've noticed if I load an A350 to full, the capacity on the loadsheet in the OIS may show 324/324 or 367/367 for example, but seats are empty on the aircraft map. Why don't they match?

oh...what's the issue with it then, as that's the pic I got. I assumed it was WASM

same problem...any solution??

In addition, I'm sure we ALL appreciate your feedbacks. It's a matter of patience I hope. Personnally I'm very frustrated with TFDi and the time they need to make the MD-11 well, as it's my favorite aircraft. Each brand has it's own politics, strength and weaknesses. We have to be patient as we have simply no choice. Take it or leave it. Such sector needs deep IT and aviation knowledge, what's rare.

I agree with you. Also the printer for exemple should be implemented far away. But as I read this forum I've the feeling that most of customers are less focussing on deeper sim than those of PMDG for exemple. When you read the PMDG forum I feel the level of pilots are in general much higher and realistic. I even sometimes have difficuilties to understand some technical topics. Here we seem to touch a larger public.

With all respect to your words is it really necessary? We ask here first for stability and fidelity that have priorities. I think we first have to focus on priorities as IB has still many points to fix or tweak.

It’s possible yeah. But these things I mention are very simple. Even freeware aircraft can get these things correct. I don’t understand the mentality/lack of testing. Just look at the HUD for example. Why was it ever released? It is completely broken and completely useless. Was it ever tested? The devs say it will be rewritten, but why? Why even include it in the first place when it’s so obviously completely broken.

To be honest I think (without proof) that IB is lacking internal how-know enough to can implement them. Maybe the A350 is too complex for them regarding what we ask here to improve. Maybe the aim was to release a nice aircraft with a certain fidelity but without deeper capabilities enough like PMDG or Fenix. I'm also surprised. That's why I doubt, too, especially when some updates can make the things sometimes worse. For exemple I found the engine sound now too present in the cabin and so unrealistic.

yeah, nevermind, it actually installed. Thanks tho.

Pretty much all the bugs still there sadly, and now another update. So 20 updates and still basic basic things wrong. I just don’t understand.

the change log is still not appearing on this forum, so the update is maybe not released, yet.

Confirming the same issue here in MSFS 2024 SU4 with native Real-Time Online (live) traffic: Airport: iniBuilds EGLL (Heathrow) Traffic: Real-Time Online (native MSFS), no injectors Symptom: arrivals are coming in normally, but I see zero AI departures (no pushbacks/taxi-out/line-ups). It’s effectively arrival-only traffic at EGLL. I disabled the default Asobo EGLL to avoid double scenery (as recommended), and the issue persists with iniBuilds EGLL active.

Alright! thanks for the information, looking forward to see the callout bug fixed! Best regards!

Hi, Tried to update but cannot install locally: What happenend? I also see the latest version showing as 1.06, is this right? Thanks

Yeah, the reverse thrust is seemingly non-existent and it really annoys me! And INI refuse to do anything about it

Just installed 1.2.0 a few minutes ago and I start a flight in Sydney, Australia at a gate. While I'm still on the "Ready To fly" screen the sim reports to me that "You just crashed" - and understand that I have NO control of the aircraft at this stage as I still need to click "Ready To Fly" button, it restores the A350 after the crash (still on the Ready to Fly screen), then I hear the aircraft engines spool up and even though the chocks are on automatically, the aircraft lurches forward and crashes into the terminal building. Here it is AFTER I click "Ready to Fly". What happened here and how come with every single update this aircraft ALWAYS has something severe wrong (WASM crashes, missing cockpit, this uncontrollable movement crap) ? The second time I loaded it up it was fine.

v2.4.9 of the iniManager has been released. This update brings a handful of quality-of-life improvements, including multi-SIM support for product add-ons, a new liveries auto-update system, and fixed video playback in the iniBuilds section. It also resolves GSX profile issues for some migrating users and includes a fix for the authentication system. This update will be downloaded automatically when you launch the app or you can manually download it here. v2.4.9 - Fixed Video playback in the iniBuilds section - Added multi-SIM support for product addons - Bug fixes for GSX profiles for some users migrating from old versions - Liveries auto-update system - Fix for a bug in the authentication system

The issue described in this thread is no WASM crash.

Hello! I wanted to make a suggestion for you about expanding the A350 livery selection for Xbox players. These include: Aeroflot, Air India, Air Mauritius, Asiana Airlines, Edelweiss Air, Fiji Airways, Hainan Airlines, Ita Airways, Korean Air, Malaysia Airlines, Philippine Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, Swiss Airlines, and Vietnam Airlines. We'd be delighted to see more liveries, just like on PC. Thank you.

Thanks