Bunyip Posted April 2 Posted April 2 What a missed chance to create a true legend.The model looks and sounds awesome. But this aircraft deserved so much more system dept. 1
wf971 Posted April 3 Posted April 3 Very true! I hope the people who contributed to it feel proud, even if the overall project suffers from what were some pretty poor executive decisions. The artistry feels very good here, even if the underlying systems have not received any due focus. I'm sure even better attention to the Dart's sounds would also have been given, if there were sufficient resources. At least I hope so. Unfortunately I feel like... we never hear from the devs? I'd quite like to thank a few of them for this plane, which has promise in buckets. 1
limbo Posted April 3 Posted April 3 Microsoft/Inibuilds product so I think that tells you (I don't own or want the thing) what you guys need to know. 1
Alexair Posted Sunday at 12:00 AM Posted Sunday at 12:00 AM The freeware F-27 available on flightsim.to is maybe a bit less appealing visually, but much more evolved system wise and the flight envelop is way much better. It's free and better, cannot go wrong here... 1
Bunyip Posted Tuesday at 09:34 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 09:34 PM These Aircraft if done the right way have a much bigger aviation fan base and thus they could have made much more money and even ask more. And for the support here to wave off any critisism to ..go to microsoft .. tells you all.
IniJamir Posted Tuesday at 10:36 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:36 PM Hi, While I understand the frustrations, we do still track the feedback here even if it's not able to be actioned by us since it is Microsoft's aircraft. That being said an update is coming for the aircraft due to reports posted on the Microsoft forums, the feedback will always be reviewed but ultimately the decision to developmentally to the aircraft solely lies on Microsoft. Thank you 1
Recommended Posts