Good, but could be better

[LukeSkyBellic]

I tested it yesterday and it seems mostly in line with the other IniBuilds aircraft!

• The TAB for screen export combines all displays into a single one, but as you did recently with the A330, each screen should be exportable individually.

• I loaded the flight from SimBrief, added the SID and STAR, and it duplicated the entire route, giving me a DEST distance of about 117,000 nm. I had to manually delete every waypoint after landing!
  I only did one test flight, which I didn’t finish because of a CTD — not sure if it was caused by the PC, the sim, or the aircraft.

[SAN738]

Yeah, I'm disappointed. I imported from SimBrief and then NAV wouldn't engage and it said I would land with -99.9k of fuel. Once again, we seem to be paid beta testers.

[dectenor2]

3 hours ago, SAN738 said:

Yeah, I'm disappointed. I imported from SimBrief and then NAV wouldn't engage and it said I would land with -99.9k of fuel. Once again, we seem to be paid beta testers.

Yep, but you forgot to add paid beta testers whose reports then aren’t actioned upon.

 

There are so many things I reported on the A350 that have been left unfixed. And then surprise surprise, the A340 comes with exactly the same bugs.

If it was just fixed properly once and for all, it could be applied to the whole fleet, and would improve all of them dramatically. 

[Swisspilot1986]

I hope there will be now a synergy between all IB products, so a bug on an aircraft type should also be corrected on another one. Now I hope IB will not push too many resources on future A220 ans A380. The A350 is nearly released since a year and actually still need fixes, too.

Thanks especially dectenor and Der Michel for their feedbacks. We all stay on touch until all products will be fully satisfying.