Swisspilot1986

In addition, I'm sure we ALL appreciate your feedbacks. It's a matter of patience I hope. Personnally I'm very frustrated with TFDi and the time they need to make the MD-11 well, as it's my favorite aircraft. Each brand has it's own politics, strength and weaknesses. We have to be patient as we have simply no choice. Take it or leave it. Such sector needs deep IT and aviation knowledge, what's rare.

I agree with you. Also the printer for exemple should be implemented far away. But as I read this forum I've the feeling that most of customers are less focussing on deeper sim than those of PMDG for exemple. When you read the PMDG forum I feel the level of pilots are in general much higher and realistic. I even sometimes have difficuilties to understand some technical topics. Here we seem to touch a larger public.

With all respect to your words is it really necessary? We ask here first for stability and fidelity that have priorities. I think we first have to focus on priorities as IB has still many points to fix or tweak.

To be honest I think (without proof) that IB is lacking internal how-know enough to can implement them. Maybe the A350 is too complex for them regarding what we ask here to improve. Maybe the aim was to release a nice aircraft with a certain fidelity but without deeper capabilities enough like PMDG or Fenix. I'm also surprised. That's why I doubt, too, especially when some updates can make the things sometimes worse. For exemple I found the engine sound now too present in the cabin and so unrealistic.

the change log is still not appearing on this forum, so the update is maybe not released, yet.

Can someone confirm the same issue or is it specific to me?

I had the same issue. I flought another airplane and the next time I used the A350 it was working again. but why?

you can click on "IniSteven" on the left of his answer and send a private message.

Could less colored points help you? I don't remember that they are so dark in reality

I suppose nobody is able to answer your request

what about now with the v1.1.9?

you maybe simply have 2 controllers e.g a sidestick and a yoke that are simultaneously connected and are in conflict.

don't you miss with the slats sound that are very loud in cockpit in v1.1.9?

But James42's topic is also valid in 2024 since the 1.1.9!

you shall now be able to open all doors included the both rest areas

despite the FIXED A350 brake cooling time not correct, temperature of the right boggie extremely rises during taxi. In addition, lowering the gear during climb doesn't help to cool down.

I don't understand why the MCDU don't load my flight. Simbrief is loaded.

as real training simulators exists nowadays can't we "cut and paste" their datas into Flight Simulator?

Let maybe the team a few weeks/updates before recalling a topic. It shall be already registered. I think the A340 will need so many time and updates like the A350

+1. I only have the default cabin. I erased the WASM file

I hope IniBuilds gave you its A340 for free...

Should the MORA be 0 in this case?

I sent him the f-pln. I tried to return back to LSZH after beginning a flight to KSFO, but I can't add a new waypoint and even an airport as a new dest.

is there no gsx profile on flightsim.to to expect resolving this issue?

Users like Der Michel, Hélène or Dectenor2 (I forget other good ones) make a great job with reporting bugs. Let me please advise all users to precise on their reports if the bugs are also concerning other IniBuilds aircrafts. By this way we can expect that a dev will apply the same correction on the fleet.