Jump to content

STK

Member
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

STK last won the day on August 29 2023

STK had the most liked content!

STK's Achievements

2

Reputation

  1. Greetings, I know it was just released, but will there be a subforum introduced for any needed support for the Local Legend Bell 47J Ranger, which was stated to be produced in cooperation with iniBuilds? I anticipate purchasing the aircraft shortly after perusing some reviews, so I don't require support at this time, but I'm noting so far that the only main threads about it are on the Official Forums. In my experience with reporting bugs to a variety of developers, more than one have quietly preferred to receive feedback directly, as...again...more than one dev seems to have discovered that they are not consistently getting feedback/bug reports from the Official Forums reporting mechanism / via Asobo and MS. Thank you.
  2. For what it's worth, I tried multiple times to reach out to SierraSim since their KMDT release last fall with no response to email or through their official support form on their website. I recommend using the newer and MUCH better Xometry version instead.
  3. On my end, A1-12 lack aircraft, A13-20 and B and beyond work fine with Hawaiian B717s that I mapped from AIG to be used by FSLTL. Just the terminal "bump out" near the highway for the initial A-gates is lacking on my system.
  4. Older thread and since then we've seen a recent PHNL release, and also noting an already good Lihue, Hawaii. With that said, KMSP would be a hit. I know that Flightbeam has one on their roadmap but they've taken a couple years already with their first product (San Fran) and won't say where MSP is on their priority order. inibuilds already hit KDTW and another provider hit O'Hare (and Midway), so the sizable Minneapolis is a glaring gap in the hub series in this part of the US.
  5. Greetings, I am *hoping* that the team was notified by now, but in consultations with the AI experts at AIG (and others), it was noted that the gate parking radius parameters (across the airport) are insufficient for some classes of aircraft - particularly heavy jets, with users consistently having issues with aircraft disappearing and reappearing while at the gate. AIG has said that inibuilds has not made the gate radiuses wide enough to support their traffic at this and other airports. There is also a known Asobo constraint with ground vehicle parking positions that also causes disappearances, but it seems like this can be partially mitigated (not fully, but an improvement) with parking radius parameters that align with "industry standards" from AIG and FSLTL. https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/637372-inibuilds-honolulu-released/page/4/ Looking forward to forthcoming updates.
×
×
  • Create New...