Nikolaj Delaney

WASM: Exception c0000005 CommBus callback in module m178088ef2d4800fa WASM: callback execution for event NAVIGRAPH_FunctionResult, in module m178088ef2d4800fa, failed MSFS2020 Navigraph data 2303r1 To reproduce: Load in LFBO Attempt to connect Navigraph - does not work even though Navigraph appears connected. Therefore unable to update. Switched to default navdata but encountered issue with missing SIDs at LFBO. Load flightplan LFBO-EKCH Go to FPL INFO, FIX INFO, Enter LFBO14R When will you start replying to my email tickets?

See attached screenshots. 1. holding was set up for a parallel or teardrop entry, but the aircraft attempted to perform a direct entry. After leaving the holding aircraft does not reset the speed back to 250 even though there is no specific speed constraint. Tested both direct with abeam and direct, aircraft stayed at 230 kt Somebody was mentioning something about competency to refine holdings in the A300, I wonder if that was then lost or? 🙂

Since when does not even being able to take off because of WASM crashes count as "product will never be perfect"?! You decided to take people's money and give them an empty charade instead of a usable addon. Borderline a scam.

I would be more than willing to pay for the PW engine option and Cargo/MRTT/Specialty versions of the A310, provided they would be priced reasonably. I would happily pay for the complete A300 - pax, cargo, all engine options. around 25€ would seem reasonable for PW+cargo A310, or up to 15+15 for each separately. 20+20 would be too much. (20Ł, or 10+10, more than 35Ł) Up to 50€ (45Ł) would seem reasonable for the complete A300 (Everyone reading this - this is my personal view. IniBuilds staff reading this - imagine how many more of these things you could sell to MSFS users over Xplane, and now that you already did and got paid for the bulk of the system work, it's my opinion that my price sensitivity is justified 😉 ) Hopefully your licensing terms with Microsoft allow you to do other versions of the A310, paid or otherwise. I'm sure there's plenty of sticklers to reality that just want the PW engines for historically PW ships :D