BrianT

Is this still going to be looked into as I see it wasn't addressed in the last update?

Well it took me long enough 😅and it's not the best but it does show the issue I didn't figure out how tro get a txt of BATC commands until just now and thta was only to me but Commands to other aircraft follow a similar pattern. I also believe that BATC doesn't require you to dictate taxi routes for AI in the scenery only to correctly label the taxiways. BATC determines the path that AI should use. anywho here is my Cecil B demill moment....(stop laughing in the cheap seats) There's no dececnty audio on it either just me rustling the mobile as I filmed it. Speedbird 117 Heavy, Gate 535, request pushback. Speedbird 117 Heavy, Heathrow Ground, pushback approved. Face south. Speedbird 117 Heavy, ready to taxi to the active. Speedbird 117 Heavy, runway 09R taxi via B, LINK 51, A, N8, NB8. Speedbird 117 Heavy, ready for departure, runway 09R. Speedbird 117 Heavy, runway 09R, lineup and wait. Speedbird 117 Heavy, Heathrow Tower, wind 060 at 11, runway 09R, cleared for takeoff.

Thanks for keeping an open mind on this I'll try and get the video you requested today. as regards BATC I should also point out that VATSIM also works on a 9L arrivals and 9R for departures, also as the displaced area is just 30 meters it's also unlikely any AI is ever going to land in that area. From Vatsim Runway Alternation When westerlies are in operation, a runway change can be expected at 1500 LOCAL. (Please note, when in easterly operations there is no runway alternation - 09L is used for arrivals and 09R for departures)

But surely that's an issue for Asobo or AI dev's to fix. Start of runway displaced or not is the start of runway. A fully laden A380 will have little or no rome to abandon a take off when starting at N8 and you can hardy get them to backtrack. This was also an issue in the 2020 version for 9L and you fixed it for that. I agree with Speedbird193 this really needs to be set to NB11

If that is in 2020 then yes just click cancel as it means RW needs to update the profile. as regards any others I would remove them completley I've found the RW profiles or the iniBuilds one's to be the best (I believe a lot of the InBuilds profiles are created by RW anyway)

In MSFS 2020 I'm using "egll-iniBuilds-rwprofiles-0lliejs.ini" and "egll-iniBuilds-rwprofiles-0lliejs.py" (they go together) if you're system is on the slow side then swap out "egll-iniBuilds-rwprofiles-0lliejs.ini" for "egll-iniBuilds-rwprofiles-0lliejs-lite.ini" In MSFS 2024 "egll-24-iniBuilds.ini" and "egll-24-iniBuilds.py" (again they go together) When you are in the sim you will need to go into GSX menu and customise this scenery and select which of the two profiles you want so in 2020 you will choose RW's profile and in 2024 you will choose the "24" profiles. once 2024 becomes more established and GSX has had a chance to figure it all out it'll get easier

I found this also it seems MSFS is trying to load all the objects before it will spawn you into the aircraft. I zoom out until I can see the whole of the UK and then go from there seems to work fine then

Great up date to EGLL looks amazing. One small issue AI Aircraft (BATC and FSTL) are now entering runway 09R at N8 rather than N11. Prior to the update (using the 2020 version in 2024) they taxied correctly to N11

I'm using Heathrow in 2024 and not had any issues yet. could probably do with a 2024 optimised version but oither than that no issues for me.

You could also check here in the inimanager, this will show all profiles made by RW profiles even fro scenery not created by inibuilds

If you're refering to the Satellite view when you select EGLL on the world map then I think it's part of an old bing map and so built into MSFS. I think only Asobo can fix it.

a fix to the AI path to make AI go to the start of runway 09L at A13 as the they are trying to join the runway at a12 and blocking the taxi way

FYI there is no GSX profile for KLAX in either the scenery install page or the GSX Profiles page.

Looks amazing, it's also my local airport and pleased to see you've included the extended runway. Would be great if as an addition you could make some much needed improvements to the port of Southampton. currently looks like a war zone!