Jump to content

BrianT

Member
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

BrianT's Achievements

15

Reputation

1

Community Answers

  1. Thanks for replying, I have to say I'm disappointed, surely fixing the mess of traffic queuing in all directions to gain entry to 9R on a busy day compared to the odd aircraft maybe landing on the numbers of 9L surely is more important. I'm not a developer and I wouldn't presume to tell you guys how to code but I don't understand why at this airport the 2 runways cannot be treated individualy? this doesn't seem to be the case at Maccosims EGCC for instance.
  2. @richboy2307 I see even with the 1.5.0 release this issue is still not fixed. can you please give us an update as to if this is ever going to be fixed?
  3. @richboy2307 Any news on an update for this and EGLL?
  4. I've just checked their Discord and the only response I see is "we're working on it" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
  5. My bad as I was waiting for Winwing to update SimApPro for the PMDG 777 LR I presumed (wrongly) it was the same for the inibuilds stuff. I'll go sit in the corner and keep quiet.
  6. I think you'll find it's the other way round and that Winwing neeed to make the MCDU compatible with the inibuilds range.
  7. If you have addons linker it's really useful for finding stuff like this. it allows you to quickly remove and add stuff
  8. I had problems with pink textures at EGGW not quite as bad as your's mine was just the side of that truck on the right foreground and the drivers in 2 baggage carts. after lots of uninstalling and re-installing both EGGW and GSX thinking the problem was there it urned out I had an old addon from flightsim.to which was a Gsx profile but included was also a replacement texture folder and it was that that was causing the problem. Have a look and see if you have a "kt-gsx-luton-textures" folder in your community folder.
  9. Is this still going to be looked into as I see it wasn't addressed in the last update?
  10. Well it took me long enough πŸ˜…and it's not the best but it does show the issue I didn't figure out how tro get a txt of BATC commands until just now and thta was only to me but Commands to other aircraft follow a similar pattern. I also believe that BATC doesn't require you to dictate taxi routes for AI in the scenery only to correctly label the taxiways. BATC determines the path that AI should use. anywho here is my Cecil B demill moment....(stop laughing in the cheap seats) There's no dececnty audio on it either just me rustling the mobile as I filmed it. Speedbird 117 Heavy, Gate 535, request pushback. Speedbird 117 Heavy, Heathrow Ground, pushback approved. Face south. Speedbird 117 Heavy, ready to taxi to the active. Speedbird 117 Heavy, runway 09R taxi via B, LINK 51, A, N8, NB8. Speedbird 117 Heavy, ready for departure, runway 09R. Speedbird 117 Heavy, runway 09R, lineup and wait. Speedbird 117 Heavy, Heathrow Tower, wind 060 at 11, runway 09R, cleared for takeoff.
  11. Thanks for keeping an open mind on this I'll try and get the video you requested today. as regards BATC I should also point out that VATSIM also works on a 9L arrivals and 9R for departures, also as the displaced area is just 30 meters it's also unlikely any AI is ever going to land in that area. From Vatsim Runway Alternation When westerlies are in operation, a runway change can be expected at 1500 LOCAL. (Please note, when in easterly operations there is no runway alternation - 09L is used for arrivals and 09R for departures)
  12. But surely that's an issue for Asobo or AI dev's to fix. Start of runway displaced or not is the start of runway. A fully laden A380 will have little or no rome to abandon a take off when starting at N8 and you can hardy get them to backtrack. This was also an issue in the 2020 version for 9L and you fixed it for that. I agree with Speedbird193 this really needs to be set to NB11
  13. If that is in 2020 then yes just click cancel as it means RW needs to update the profile. as regards any others I would remove them completley I've found the RW profiles or the iniBuilds one's to be the best (I believe a lot of the InBuilds profiles are created by RW anyway)
  14. In MSFS 2020 I'm using "egll-iniBuilds-rwprofiles-0lliejs.ini" and "egll-iniBuilds-rwprofiles-0lliejs.py" (they go together) if you're system is on the slow side then swap out "egll-iniBuilds-rwprofiles-0lliejs.ini" for "egll-iniBuilds-rwprofiles-0lliejs-lite.ini" In MSFS 2024 "egll-24-iniBuilds.ini" and "egll-24-iniBuilds.py" (again they go together) When you are in the sim you will need to go into GSX menu and customise this scenery and select which of the two profiles you want so in 2020 you will choose RW's profile and in 2024 you will choose the "24" profiles. once 2024 becomes more established and GSX has had a chance to figure it all out it'll get easier
  15. I found this also it seems MSFS is trying to load all the objects before it will spawn you into the aircraft. I zoom out until I can see the whole of the UK and then go from there seems to work fine then
×
×
  • Create New...