Jump to content

Ralgh

Member
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Ralgh's Achievements

7

Reputation

  1. I don't think this is working correctly in the sim. I have been having an issue where it is loading 5290 lbs. of fuel in the trim tank with no fuel in the center tank, and I cannot get it to transfer automatically or manually.
  2. I am seeing the same thing in the -200. I have taken to adding 5290 lbs. of tanker fuel so I will have enough to get to my destination with adequate reserves.
  3. Okay I figured it out. Amazing what you can accomplish when you read the PDF that comes with the paintkit. I found the answer on page 12 of that document.
  4. I have done a repaint for both the -900 and -1000 but am having a problem with the cabin door outlines. Usually paintkits have a layer on the fuselage or there is a specific texture for the door outlines. I can find neither for the A350. The interesting part is that my repaint for the -900 shows no door outlines on the plane in the sim and the -1000 has gray outlines even though my fuselage textures have no outlines on them. Any assistance on how to paint my own door outlines for both versions in appreciated.
  5. I am having the same problem.
  6. Now I have never been on a real A350, but I have flown the EMB-120, 727, Fokker 100, 737-800 and A320 family of aircraft during my career and you can't hear the flap's movement in any of those planes. I've also been on the jumpseat of multiple other types and have never heard the flap's movement from the cockpit. I'm guessing the pilots don't hear the flap movement in the A350 either. Could someone please have a look and see if the sim is representing the real world flap sounds for an A360?
  7. Ralgh

    A350 green flow

    https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/25808-green-wires-on-the-outside-model/ Try the above link for a possible solution.
  8. In the MSFS world the windows are built into the model so they cannot be plugged like we could do in the P3D world. They would have to make a model for every different window option.
  9. Disregard. Misread post.
  10. Here you can see on the ORCKA departure out of LAX and the LENDY arrival into JFK the active fixes on the SID/STAR are displayed on the 160 mile range. The same fixes remained displayed on the 320 mile range too. Again there are other SID/STAR fixes displayed but I still am not sure of what the criteria is for that because not all the other SID/STAR fixes are displayed.
  11. Okay, I fly a trip tomorrow and will try to remember to get a pic of it. Interestingly enough I was paying particular attention to it on my last trip, and it was often showing one or two fixes beyond the active fix on the arrival. I don't know if it has to do with distance between fixes or what criteria it was using but the active fix was always displayed.
  12. In the simulation the aircraft is not starting to slow to 250 knots until reaching 10,000 feet in the descent in managed speed. It should plan to be at 250 knots when reaching 10,000 feet.
  13. The active waypoint is not being displayed on the nav display when the range is greater than 80 miles. Is it correct that the waypoints on the SID and STAR aren't displayed above 80 miles range except the active waypoint is always displayed in the real world aircraft.
  14. When starting the engines the lower ECAM page should stay on the ENGINE page until the ENG mode knob is returned to the NROM position. In the current version of the simulation the lower ECAM page automatically switches to the WHEEL page at about 52% N2 which is not correct.
  15. We don't have the A320 NEO but I do fly the A321 NEO with the CFM LEAP at my work and the engines do respond much quicker when setting takeoff thrust than what I am seeing in the simulation. My real world experience matches what is shown in the linked video above.
×
×
  • Create New...