Jump to content

Aburek

Member
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Aburek last won the day on April 24 2023

Aburek had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Aburek's Achievements

10

Reputation

  1. the PFD in the A300/310 does not have an altitude tape.
  2. Aburek

    Destnation EFOB

    Hi All, Did this not make the SU12 update? Its a fairly large missing bit of info in the FMS. Thanks
  3. Can you show the FMS screenshot of the F-PLN page?
  4. It is possible to deploy one at a time on the real aircraft. In the case of one reverser being deferred is an example.
  5. It should also be noted that the wheel should not spin without G and Y hydraulics pressurized and the pitch trim levers engaged.
  6. Its in the settings menu of the EFB.
  7. Is nosewheel steering active in the EFB?
  8. I believe he means transition altitude/level. As this aircraft is older tech, that is manually set to or from STD by the crew. Theres no FMC setting for that.
  9. Aburek

    ILS tuning

    ILS was 109.5, therefore you should have tuned to 109.50. xxx.05 is not valid.
  10. I believe this is an MSFS code issue. If used with vPilot and VATSIM the TFR switch works correctly.
  11. Its consistent. I arm P.DES between 20-30nm prior to T/D, although ive done it earlier just to see if it makes a difference. I believe it is related to any STAR that has a 280KT constraint. It seems the aircraft will speed up to that prior to T/D when in actuality it should descend at the selected mach number and hold at the speed constraint once it reaches it in the descent.
  12. Anyone else notice that about 10nm prior to descent in P DES the aircraft accelerates to M0.82 or so from .79 before TOD? In real life it does not do that.
  13. Takeoff and descent in PROF mode is recommended actually. You just have to be more aware of what the airplane is doing as opposed to just "setting it and forgetting it". The crew must constantly monitor all phases of flight. As rudimentary as it is, the A300/A310 does better than the EMB-190 in real life. Typical rule of thumb for decent is that youll cross a constraint at the altitude you want, or speed, but not both. In either case, use the spoilers to get you where you need.
  14. I have access to an actual APS program for the A300/A310. Side by side they only differ a few degrees. My company limits to 54 I believe but the difference is only a few tenths of percent.
×
×
  • Create New...