Awesome work on the A380 VC geometry accuracy compared to the A350, huge improvement! Just noticed a couple of small details missing on the glareshield though, the visible bolts and that small hole in the front on galreshield didn't make it in (attached comparison) I hope this gets added in a future update!

Edited September 19Sep 19 by Gtyh212

On 9/19/2026 at 10:53 AM, Gtyh212 said:

Awesome work on the A380 VC geometry accuracy compared to the A350, huge improvement! Just noticed a couple of small details missing on the glareshield though, the visible bolts and that small hole in the front on galreshield didn't make it in (attached comparison) I hope this gets added in a future update!

Hi,

Thanks for your detailed feedback! I will log this for the team.

Thanks again!

19 hours ago, iniKyle said:

Hi,

Thanks for your detailed feedback! I will log this for the team.

Thanks again!

not just the missing bolts but also the modelling of the airvent too although the one in the photo may actually also be damaged

Edited September 21Sep 21 by airvice

Hello, I would like to fine more report a geometry discrepancy in the A380 cockpit model regarding the nozzle object on the window pillar, unlike the real aircraft, where the outer housing features a rounded rectangle shape with smooth corners and sits right near the edge of the pillar with a very narrow gap, the model renders it as a sharp rectangular frame and leaves an unnaturally wide margin from the pillar edge and also location seems to be wrong as well Hopefully, this can be refined in a future update🙏

Edited September 23Sep 23 by Gtyh212

5 minutes ago, Gtyh212 said:

Hello, I would like to fine more report a geometry discrepancy in the A380 cockpit model regarding the nozzle object on the window pillar, unlike the real aircraft, where the outer housing features a rounded rectangle shape with smooth corners and sits right near the edge of the pillar with a very narrow gap, the model renders it as a sharp rectangular frame and leaves an unnaturally wide margin from the pillar edge and also location seems to be wrong as well Hopefully, this can be refined in a future update🙏

Thanks, will log for the team to take a look!

34 minutes ago, iniKyle said:

Thanks, will log for the team to take a look!

Lmao you guys have become very good tbh. When the only complaint we have is about bolts, you know you’ve done it.

LoL. These posts are hilarious.

5 minutes ago, MITCH1988 said:

LoL. These posts are hilarious.

I can definitely appreciate the attention to detail. It's what constantly pushes us to become better!

27 minutes ago, iniKyle said:

I can definitely appreciate the attention to detail. It's what constantly pushes us to become better!

I have a question Kyle. In the case of the A350, ofc it took a while for V2 but it makes sense since it’s considerable and you needed to go back and take new measurements and get new references and it’s a huge revamp and all. How does an adjustment of adding bolts, holes, etc. work in this case. What is the timeline and priority for such corrections? I’m curious to know.

46 minutes ago, iniKyle said:

I can definitely appreciate the attention to detail. It's what constantly pushes us to become better!

I'm definitely not saying it's bad. Inibuilds did such a good job that missing bolts are what is basically wrong with the plane. It's just funny.

27 minutes ago, frap99 said:

I have a question Kyle. In the case of the A350, ofc it took a while for V2 but it makes sense since it’s considerable and you needed to go back and take new measurements and get new references and it’s a huge revamp and all. How does an adjustment of adding bolts, holes, etc. work in this case. What is the timeline and priority for such corrections? I’m curious to know.

Priority is usually determined by the severity of the issue. If it’s a "game-breaking" bug, it will generally be addressed immediately.

Something like this would be passed along to the art team and would most likely be added to the list for one of the next 1–2 updates.

Hope this helps!

Thanks!

4 hours ago, MITCH1988 said:

LoL. These posts are hilarious.

its attention to detail that results in products being this level. unless customers push for the best quality we dont get where we are today and would still be flying 2d cockpits. we should be thanking those taking the trouble to point out these things for the ultimate benefit of all of us not mocking them just because graphical detail isnt important to some as systems

1 minute ago, airvice said:

its attention to detail that results in products being this level. unless customers push for the best quality we dont get where we are today and would still be flying 2d cockpits. we should be thanking those taking the trouble to point out these things for the ultimate benefit of all of us not mocking them just because graphical detail isnt important to some as systems

Agreed, 100%

4 hours ago, iniKyle said:

I can definitely appreciate the attention to detail. It's what constantly pushes us to become better!

exactly and this is the attitude of a company that sees the benefit and appreciates the constructive criticism rather than discouraging it like some other very well known developers still do, good business sense and we can all see the results

This issue was logged, but it still hasn't been fixed in 1.0.1

7 minutes ago, Gtyh212 said:

This issue was logged, but it still hasn't been fixed in 1.0.1

Correct, it didn't make it into v1.0.1. I have double checked that it has been logged with the team for a fix.

Thanks for your patience!