My 2 cents...

[Der Michel]

The plane is really getting annoying....a lot reports by myself and most of them still open/not fixed...every time I try something differnet, I find new bugs.

I suggest STOP adding new features and do some weeks of bug hunting. New features are nice, but if the basic plane is bugged as this...sorry but I have no appreciation for that.

[Swisspilot1986]

I agree. All bugs should be cleaned before launching the ULR and the head-up display for exemple. Otherwise it will be a non-end frustration. 

[Janko]

1 hour ago, Der Michel said:

The plane is really getting annoying....a lot reports by myself and most of them still open/not fixed...every time I try something differnet, I find new bugs.

I suggest STOP adding new features and do some weeks of bug hunting. New features are nice, but if the basic plane is bugged as this...sorry but I have no appreciation for that.

Take a rest chap, plane is just perfect. Looking forward to new features ♥

[silentghostx]

9 hours ago, Der Michel said:

The plane is really getting annoying....a lot reports by myself and most of them still open/not fixed...every time I try something differnet, I find new bugs.

I suggest STOP adding new features and do some weeks of bug hunting. New features are nice, but if the basic plane is bugged as this...sorry but I have no appreciation for that.

Agree. Especially when each update breaks things that have been working in the past. Slow down on the new features and fixing the inaccuracies to make the A350 an A350 would be appreciated.

[unairspace]

Agreeeed. I sincerly asked for that on this forum and no body seemed to give a care.

[Farlis]

10 hours ago, Janko said:

plane is just perfect.

No it's not. He has made dozens of reports about stuff that is buggy or a deviation from the behaviour of the real thing. Quite a valuable contribution, but I get that it can get tiresome if update after update the most glaring ones are still not fixed.

On the other hand there have been improvements that were a direct reaction to his feedback. So not all is lost.

[MPO910]

I ✅ agree on the OP. 

BUG fixing and performance gains should be top priority...  

There a too many complains and most of them are common at many users

[haza2]

6 hours ago, unairspace said:

Agreeeed. I sincerly asked for that on this forum and no body seemed to give a care.

 

3 hours ago, MPO910 said:

I ✅ agree on the OP. 

BUG fixing and performance gains should be top priority...  

There a too many complains and most of them are common at many users

 

6 hours ago, Farlis said:

No it's not. He has made dozens of reports about stuff that is buggy or a deviation from the behaviour of the real thing. Quite a valuable contribution, but I get that it can get tiresome if update after update the most glaring ones are still not fixed.

On the other hand there have been improvements that were a direct reaction to his feedback. So not all is lost.

Hello,

Thank you for your feedback @Der Michel, we 100% do care on all bugs, last week I spent a lot of time going though every bug report on the forums and Discord making records of them for the dev team so we do not miss important details. Sometimes these bugs take some time to squash. Appreciate your patience and keep the reports coming! 

Thank you. 

 

[Der Michel]

1 hour ago, haza2 said:

 

 

Hello,

Thank you for your feedback @Der Michel, we 100% do care on all bugs, last week I spent a lot of time going though every bug report on the forums and Discord making records of them for the dev team so we do not miss important details. Sometimes these bugs take some time to squash. Appreciate your patience and keep the reports coming! 

Thank you. 

 

Thanks, for your effort to check every bug. I keep posting new ones.

Yeah the plane flies well from A to B, but all the basic stuff that's not correct is really frustrating.

 

[dectenor1]

Yeah I have to agree here.

I usually do a few flights after a new version, and see the same old bugs and then also new bugs, and so the aircraft goes straight back to the hangar.

Again, as @Der Michel says, these are basic things, I don't really understand why they were incorrect in the first place or have not been fixed. For those of us who enjoy realism, there is just no desire to fly this aircraft when there are others that simply don't have these basic errors. It is very disappointing for an aircraft that is marketed as offering unparalleled immersion and realism .

One can see how the frustration builds as well, when we constantly see new features, snow accumulation, printers etc., and yet the basic core functions still do not work.

I do not mean to be negative, it is just so frustrating when you spend hours and hours of your own time testing and making reports, reading the FCOM etc., and you just wonder if anyone from the team is also actually doing this, given that all the basic errors and bugs are still there after all these updates.

Of course it goes without saying that I thank all the team for the continued work on it, we'll get there eventually. It is just a shame that the release was, and still is, so far off what was promised.
 

Edited 13 hours ago by dectenor1

[Xenon341]

I like the report I see, those of Der Michel are always interesting to read I learn a lot of stuff.

But just to give some informations, there are multiples FCOM, multiples revisions of the avionics.
There are also a lot of options company dependant (Like the BTV Autobrake off audio warning speed threshold).

I have in mind the AIRCFT STATUS page that was indicated as wrong in those forums with picture as evidences.
But the AIRCFT STATUS page in the ini version is also correct, just not the same avionics revision.

I'm saying this just to underline that every bug report has to be verified. Ini may have missed stuff, but they also have their own sources for what they do.

And qualify a report can take time, and once qualified, it needs to be prioritized, implemented, tested and released. All of that within an already filled planing as you can imagine.

I still hope to find some fixes as you do, especially on the WASM crashes sides but this is also on Asobo side and some enhancement are planned for SU3 iirc.

 

PS : I'm not an ini employee and have not any stock in the company.