Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The A350 is in many ways a switch in FS simulation. Going from the solid, old-school aircraft to a seriously modern sophisticated airliner. Difficult to simulate and replicate. I am mighty impressed by the Inibuild team. Yes, there will be teething problems initially. Feedback and information will assist in enhancing this product. 

The FMS on the real thing has over 70 pages, they got most of them working. That by itself is impressive. With time, feedback from the community and tweaks will undoubtedly mark this as one of the best and advanced products ever created for MSFS. 

Keep up the good work Inibuild. Tweak it, listen to the feedback and make this thing shine.

If you are able to go the extra mile, syncing the ECAM to the FCOM level 2/3 notes on the OIT and the TOPA (Performance calculator). Next level indeed, as this is one of the many features of the A350/A380 that makes it different and unique. 

OPS Library (FCOM/FCTM, FCI, Bulletins, MEL) etc is indeed vital and used on a daily basis. Flying an Airbus is an exercise of manual searching, knowledge and comprehension. MSFS operational MELs addition to the TOPA would be just like the real thing. (Very rear for an Airbus to push without an MEL).  System resets, pretty much a daily occurrence and done with FCOM/FCI guidance, hence the need for the OPS Library. The addition of the Loadsheet and refueling application to the OIT would be next. Trying to accurately simulate an Airbus A350 is a big ask.

Amazing job Inibuild!

 

Edited by Eurosky
  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, teyyaremakinisti said:

Open your eyes instead of being sycophants. Paying 70 pounds for this product is nothing short of being scammed. It is far from a study-level product, to put it simply. The TO checklists in ECAM and FMS are not compatible with each other. While the T.O Config appears green in FMS, it shows blue in ECAM. Is this how a study-level aircraft is released? I feel scammed by inis***. But the worst part is that a project this beautiful was also intended to be developed by Fenix, but they canceled it after Inis*** announced it. I wish they had made it.

Microsoft Flight Simulator Screenshot 2025.03.10 - 16.39.01.38.png

I think you need to calm down your tones otherwise you will be removed from this forum.

We have received a huge amount of constructive feedback from user and continue to improve the A350.

  • Like 3
Posted

I am a "Boing" guy, I was a real world 747 Captain for 15 years. However the lack of a serious set of heavies in the sim (2024) so far (I do fly the PMDG 777 in 2024) and have recently rode as a passenger on the Eh350 for Several Pacific crossings I thought I would give the 350-1000 a try.   

Quite a different aircraft in concept and maybe a computer drivers airplane, but giving it a full effort.  The difficulty is in data entry where the boxes will not activate for entry, and only occasionally function. Very difficult to do a full pre flight of the FMS.    As to and flying, not entirely pleased with the fly by wire which should make it easier?  

Posted
4 hours ago, teyyaremakinisti said:

Open your eyes instead of being sycophants. Paying 70 pounds for this product is nothing short of being scammed. It is far from a study-level product, to put it simply. The TO checklists in ECAM and FMS are not compatible with each other. While the T.O Config appears green in FMS, it shows blue in ECAM. Is this how a study-level aircraft is released? I feel scammed by inis***. But the worst part is that a project this beautiful was also intended to be developed by Fenix, but they canceled it after Inis*** announced it. I wish they had made it.

Microsoft Flight Simulator Screenshot 2025.03.10 - 16.39.01.38.png

No one stopped Fenix developing 350. It was Amir's own decision. I like Fenix 320 but the way Amir made remarks about ini was very unprofessional. 

 

JUST AN FYI, FENIX IS BASED ON PROSIM AND PROSIM DOES NOT HAVE 350. 

Posted

I have to say, I too am really please with the Inibuild A350. I think its the only aircraft that works correctly in MSFS2024. Very little glitches. However it would be nice if inibuild could figure out how to get the navigraph maps to appear constantly on the EFB. It starts off ok but halfway through a flight I just get black screens. The onlymap available is the standard version. Maybe its a streaming issue and an FS2024 one to fix but I'm sure inibuild you have some pull there now as most youtube clips about FS2024 have your A350 as the highlight.

I also believe that Inibuild have been pretty good so far getting in and trying their best to tweak the a350 to make it better (Already at version 1.04). Can't say the same about Asobo.

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...