Jump to content

EFB Performance: True vs. Magnetic


UpUpandAway

Recommended Posts

Could I confirm that the EFB performance pages use magnetic heading for the runway and true for the METAR?

For Cape Town (magnetic variation 26 degrees West) I noticed that the true wind from the METAR is inserted into the performance page when syncing:

METAR.thumb.jpg.bf565d9e8e40be343b604f5e201e88e5.jpg

But the runway heading is magnetic:

MAGvsTRU.thumb.jpg.79813f34cad55077935588d50efd1983.jpg

 

If the EFB were comparing apples with apples, it would need to use 156/17 magnetic for the wind, or is the variation taken care of in the background?

 

Edited by UpUpandAway
More detail added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Please allow me to bump this topic:

Magnetic variation in FACT is 26°W. Syncing the EFB T/O performance loads the magnetic runway heading and the true wind from the METAR.

Is the discrepancy dealt with by the EFB, or should I be adding variation to the WIND field? All academic I suppose, but having the variation applied automatically would be cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your question. I've shared with the team for a more detailed response of what the EFB is doing.

But meanwhile, yes ideally all bearings used should be same (both Magnetic or both True) when making calculations. So you could make the adjustment by entering TRUE bearing for the runway,  or by adjusting the reported True METAR wind bearing by MAGVAR.

Thanks!

  • Thanks 1

Vrishabh Sehgal @Richboy2307 )
Community Team Member & Tester
IniBuilds Ltd. | inibuilds.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...