A300-600P climb rate V.1.0.4 ?

[pmplayer]

Hi all,

Doeing a first flight at the moment with V.1.0.4 and the A300-600P and saw a climb rate ( at 24000 feet and 135000lbs  ) with 800fpm what looks a bit wired to me ?

This went goeing on to my altitude of 36000 feet more or less so i had around 165nm to 36000 feet and that seems not normal i would say. 🤔

This wasen´t like this with V.1.0.3 there i had around 130-135nm what looks more normal to me..

Anyone else have such a experience ?

cheers 😉

[Deleted Account]

Always depends on the CI, would need exact flight plans with CI, weights etc. to see if anything is wrong though

[Crabby]

On 2/3/2024 at 6:58 AM, pmplayer said:

Hi all,

Doeing a first flight at the moment with V.1.0.4 and the A300-600P and saw a climb rate ( at 24000 feet and 135000lbs  ) with 800fpm what looks a bit wired to me ?

This went goeing on to my altitude of 36000 feet more or less so i had around 165nm to 36000 feet and that seems not normal i would say. 🤔

This wasen´t like this with V.1.0.3 there i had around 130-135nm what looks more normal to me..

Anyone else have such a experience ?

cheers 😉

CI, cost index, etc. etc.  

[pmplayer]

To reply back, always i get a 100 or 90 from Simbrief, and tried with 60 and it was a little better but realy a little bit compared to 100.

By the way, what CI is used normal for the A300-600 ?

cheers 😉

[Alexair]

There is really no "normal" CI used in any aircraft. CI change very often and in real life, even when the release give you a CI (the "release" is the real name given to the equivalent of simbrief FPL), it is not very often used. Most of the time the capt is using whatever CI is more convenient for the flight or to him (is the flight late, is it a go-home day, is he flying a super-critical line (ie: making more money for him), etc.), sometime we don't even use CI at all, but either FLC or VS with speed/Mach. At least that's what we do in real life in US (same for Airbus or Boeing).

Edited February 6 by Alexair