Farlis

That's GSX. Check your profile for Heathrow.

Now I know what happened to my PMDG777 in VR. I had the same issue in VR and had no clue what was going on. Now I see this thread and all makes sense.

It's not realistic to fly long haul over 8 hours alone without a shift change. So flying sped up is the best option.

Cannot confirm. Issue is gone all works as it should now.

My experience is that it OVERestimates the fuel burn. I usually take up about 300kg more than the OFP states, which is good practice, but in the A350 that is not necessary because I end up with more than 1000kg than estimated at my destination. At least it used to be this way, maybe the updated profiles calculate the fuel burn mor precicesly.

I have the same issue. What is especially odd that after just updating to the newest version and clearing the WASM folder it worked on my first flight. But the 2nd time I fired up simulator and aircraft it is broken again and won't print F-Plan INIT and T.O. Data when it should.

Apart from the obvious typo I can confirm this behavior. The newest patch broke the Terrain Display on the FO side. Don't you love it when something that fixes one thing breaks another at the same time?

Because you watched videos on YouTube of the real thing, and not because you actually fly the real thing you are 100% confident? Bold. I would never be more than 86% confident about some aircraft behavior I have never flown in real life myself numerous times. 😉

A logged bug is not a fixed bug.

I mean +21 ISA... QED.

Just a heads up: You do know that you can use the windows key + the print key to make screenshots inside the sim and don't have to make a photo of your monitor?

That's the problem then. Sometimes Live weather is bugged and reports wrong temperatures. Happens in the Gander area around Greenland and northern Canada at times. When you are at FL370 trying to do a step climb but outside air temperature is at +2°C things will not go as they should.

If you like it need and clean then the covers belong there. Every airline that has the HUDS installed uses the covers as per manufacturers recommendation and actually prerequisite to not void the guarantee. These things are expensive and you don't want any scratches on them. Thefore they are always stowed away with the covers on them when not used.

As far as I know brake temperature accumulation is not yet simulated. This is also reflected in BTV where changing the distance of breaking does nothing to change the turnaround times.

So people really expect them to spend development time into getting procedures for an airport to work that has been discontinued 25 years ago? You learn something new every day...