GermanSimPilot

Hi, regarding the recently shown Early-MSN (Batch 2) and Modern-MSN (Batch 7) configurations: Will the appropriate configuration be automatically selected based on the aircraft/livery/registration, at least for official iniBuilds liveries? For example, if I select a Lufthansa livery representing a specific D-AIMx aircraft, will the EFB automatically default to the configuration appropriate for that particular aircraft, or will Early/Modern MSN always have to be selected manually by the user? Also, are these two configurations intended to represent complete aircraft standards, or will individual equipment/system options be configurable separately? I really appreciate the dedicated and hard work inibuilds is putting in here, and I can't wait to fly the A380.

I definitely agree with the previously mentioned speedbrake rattling/buffeting sound. I understand that deploying the speedbrakes creates disturbed airflow over the wing and causes aerodynamic loads and vibrations throughout the airframe. However, I am not sure how much of this would actually be audible in the real A350 flight deck. In the current version, the rattling effect seems extremely pronounced and gives me the impression that the entire flight deck is being shaken. If possible, it would be great if this could be compared against recordings or feedback from A350 pilots. Another area I would love to see revisited is the sound of the cockpit pushbuttons and KCCU keys. I recorded examples of the EFIS control panel pushbuttons, ECAM control panel pushbuttons and KCCU keyboard. They do have different sound effects depending on the panel, but to my ears they all sound somewhat artificial and overly “plasticky”. It is difficult to describe precisely, but they don't quite convey the mechanical feel I would expect from actual flight deck controls. More authentic recordings and/or some additional mechanical depth to these sounds would greatly improve the tactile impression of operating the cockpit. There is also an airflow/fan-like sound during initial electrical power-up that I noticed. After switching on the batteries and the first systems begin to come alive, this sound appears almost instantaneously at full volume. I assume this represents an avionics ventilation fan or another airflow-related system, although I am not certain. If that is indeed what the sound represents, I would expect the fan/airflow noise to build up more gradually as the fan spools up and airflow is established, rather than appearing immediately at its final level. A short fade/spool-up transition could make this part of the power-up sequence feel considerably more natural. Finally, I would really appreciate another look at the engine start sound sequence and its synchronization with the simulated engine parameters. I made recordings of a cold engine start both with and without the OIS active-noise-cancelling headset option enabled. What particularly stands out to me is the timing of the characteristic low-frequency rumble/spool-up sound following light-off. Fuel flow and EGT already indicate that combustion has begun, but the prominent engine-start rumble only becomes audible roughly 12-15 seconds later, at which point fuel flow is already around 900 kg/h in my recording. To my ears, this makes the sound sequence feel disconnected from what the engine indications are showing. I would expect the audible transition associated with light-off and the subsequent acceleration towards idle to correlate more closely with fuel introduction, EGT rise and the actual engine spool-up. The individual sound itself may be fine; it is mainly the timing/layering and synchronization that currently sounds unnatural to me. I have recorded short videos demonstrating all of the above and can attach them as references. Pushbuttons Avionics fan? ENG1 Start without ANC ENG2 Start with ANC And as Harrycot already said, I, too, would like to thank you all for the hard work and the opportunity to provide feedback - I really appreciate it.

Hello Team, today's flight was FRA-SFO and over the north of canada, it happens again. There was no wasm crash shown in the debug console but the A350 behaved so. I have attached the flightplan and last autosafe file. If you need additional information, please let me know. EDDFKSFO_M24_29Nov25.pln 1764399029.bin EDDFKSFO_INA_1764372940.fpl

I just experienced another full freeze of the A350 after an auto step climb to FL400. The entire aircraft systems stopped responding, displays were frozen, inputs had no effect, but the simulator itself was still running. I opened the Dev Console and saw several repeating error messages, such as: Key values outside of a section (ivao_mtl...) and [Coherent GT] Failed to locate file vfs://html_ui/global/undefined. After ending the flight and reloading the autosave file, the aircraft worked normally again. It seems similar to a WASM crash, but the simulator does not CTD, it’s more like a soft freeze or FMGC deadlock after the automatic step climb. I use the latest MS Store Version of FS24

After some time, i choose the A350 to perform a longhaul flight EDDF-VHHH. After around 9h of flighttime, i run through the fms, showing the PERF page, i went on DES and want to have a look about the speed constrains, clicked the button and this causes a WASM crash. Very disappointing for me, with 1h of flighttime left to HKG i had to alt-f4. This was a IVAO Tour leg, so this leg was flown in real time with no time compression. I will not take the A350 in the near future again until these WASM crashes are COMPLETLY deald with.

After opening the INI Manager today i was suprised, an update was shown. BUT: It shows update to 1.0.5 and then to 1.0.6. I will test the A300 now, maybe the V/S Bug is solved.

Seems to be a bigger issue, otherwise we would hear something. Hope it will be fixed soon, flying without proper V/S makes no fun at all. I will keep the A300 in the hangar until this is fixed.

Same V/S issue with V1.0.6

Hello everyone. Last Saturday i took the A310 again for a flight. While cockpit preperation i noticed that the warning "bings" are very loud. I reduced the system volume by almost 50%. I'm fully aware of the fact that notification or warning sounds need to be loud, but i guess not that loud. Is there any way to reduce the volume level? Greetings

So far the sounds are good to me. The only issue i have is the far too loud "bing" sounds (warning sounds) from the system when powering up the aircraft. I do turn down the volume by 50% before i perform the engine fire test... wonder if it's meant to be that loud?