David Cherrie
-
Posts
16 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by David Cherrie
-
-
3 hours ago, Rainerb said:
I tried the Version 1.08. but it was Not stable on my System, I Reporter this allready in another thread. Therefore i switched back to the Version 1.07. (recovered it from previous Backup). With this Version i took Part on the Cross of the pod yesterday without any issues. Hopefully the next Version is stable, until this i do my flights with the Older Version.
iniBuilds really needs to have the ability to rollback versions or pull their v1.0.8. I'm not going to update their aircraft anymore without taking a save of a working build.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, tesla said:
It turns out that it's not just me who can't fly long distances after updating 1.0.8,The error code is consistent with yours one by one 0X8000003.I have no issues with the previous version, and I have not made any changes to my computer or simulation settings.If you're nlucky, start the englucky, you can fly for 6 hours. If you're uine and then exit to the desktop。
You just have to look at the Cross the Pond data and the amount of people who started their flights in the A359/A35K did not complete their flights.
-
3 hours ago, LukeSkyBellic said:
I just had to abort an EGLL-RKSI flight because at some point the controls stopped responding! Only the OIS worked but not even well because I launched an autosave now that was never created.
Is it not possible to go back to version 1.0.7?? Unfortunately I have not saved the file anywhere, because I update via the Ini Manager.
Before the last update everything worked perfectly.Have put in the suggestion being able to rollback updates since the rollout of 1.0.8 has created a huge hole in the stability of the aircraft. A lot of people reporting that they aren't getting CTD in SU2 beta which leads me to believe they have developed 1.0.8 using SU2 beta SDK which is not backwards compatible with the current live version of MFS.
-
17 minutes ago, haza2 said:
A lot of people are arnt having any issues and some are, yesterday over 260 A350s crossed the pond.
A lot more than 260 started but never reached their destinations. Looking at the statistics from VATSIM is indicating a huge widespread problem with A350. Hundreds of connections flying the A359/A35K quickly dropped connection in the first two hours then eventually being overtaken by the B77W.
-
1
-
-
Very annoying when on VATSIM changing STAR at controllers request and then having absolutely no navigation...
-
1
-
-
Would be nice if they provided in the update release notifications that being on SU1 BETA for MFS2024 is required in the iniManager instead of having users to search the forums as to why the aircraft freezes the sim.
-
Why isn't the phrase "SU1 BETA for MFS2024 Required" not on the iniManager or product description page but only found on the forum. Wasted 2 hours of my life troubleshooting why 2024 no longer worked and cleared my WASM and followed what the iniManager said.
Users would benefit much clearer messaging regarding important issues like this and your Discord and forums wouldn't be so flooded.
-
Are you getting the pink missing texture in 2024 on the wing?
-
6 hours ago, SharpWings31 said:
Since in MSFS2024 almost all content is streamed, is there a reason why not to integrate all liveries directly into the main game content instead of having to download them separately on this Forums or via iniBuilds launcher?
Because iniBuild's liveries that are on the iniManager are not necessarily done by iniBuilds staff nor have approval from Asobo or the airlines they are representing.
-
2 hours ago, BetrWingmodels said:
This was disheartening to read. You confirmed that some adult human beings cannot process what anyone's working eyes can see.
Pictures don't mean anything? Not useful? You cannot tell that Fenix got the wings modelled perfectly to the real plane while inibuilds did not? You watched pics which I provided.........and have or at least, should have the capabilities to go ahead and perform your own test to double check...yet will watch clear evidence showcasing how different, inaccurate and terrible the inibuilds wings are modelled on their A310 (the worse by a mile and on par with the FBW/Asobo A320), their A300 and now yet again, their A320?,
At this point, I can bet the price of the A350 and A380 from Inibuilds to have misshaped wings also as this is plane No.3 and no improvement from them, and bc no FSim consumer has the time or effort to go as far as to scour the Internet or approach Airbus for "3D models", somehow we should accept the lack of effort on the part of a developer who charges for their addons and tell anyone who notices room for improvement that their eyes recieves them. That is what you're saying right? If you don't find my pictures/screenshots enough proof why don't you check for yourself? I'm so confused by this response.
I'm a professional modeler and I have spent the past 15 years re-creating 3D models and environments to represent the real world so I have as much of an eye to detail as anyone you would come across. You have posted photos of a screen (not screenshots) with different camera positions with different focal lengths with no other detail at all. I see differences between the Fenix A320ceo and the iniBuilds A320neo because they have different engines and different pylons because they are 2 different aircraft.
If you can't be in any way constructive (and after reading your previous thread which also has no detail at all), how are developers or anyone who doesn't have telepathic powers supposed to address the issue?
Take screenshots of your computer, and use red circles to point out and list the inconsistencies. You are the one coming to the forums in a rude manor with no explanation other than you think it is wrong and is in no way productive for anyone.-
3
-
-
No idea what you are talking about but since you didn't give any detail at all but pictures of two different models of planes. If you have the correct specifications, what are they? Unless there are obvious differences, you can't go off of photos or screenshots, you need to compare the actual 3D models and specifications.
For example the Asobo 747-8 is actually 1.8m shorter than the actual plane. You won't see that in photos and screenshots, only way you can see it is comparing the 3D model to the specifications.
-
1
-
-
On 3/31/2024 at 6:02 AM, richboy2307 said:
Thanks, noted and reported the issue.
I believe this is in the merge GLTF model provided for liveries. Will the fix mean that all liveries need to be updated? Or is this from the base product where an animation is not referenced?
-
Apparently to do with AIRAC update has bricked the aircraft. iniBuilds have said they are sending a hotfix to Asobo.
-
Is the paintkit no longer available...?
-
Can confirm deleting Scenery Indexes does not fix the issue. I'd assume that most recent update has played with your inhibit area for default scenery but interestingly enough, reinstalling the Asobo handcrafted scenery also has the default AI buildings there too.
On 7/1/2023 at 5:44 PM, gumbyger said:Out of interest.. What happens, if y'all that are having the problem delete the SceneryIndexes?
Steam Version: C:\Users\YourUsername\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft Flight Simulator\SceneryIndexes
MS Store Version: C:\Users\YourUsername\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.FlightSimulator_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalCache\SceneryIndexes
A disaster!
in Systems
Posted
Sharing files is software piracy… you can’t recover it unless you purposely saved it yourself. Going to have to wait till a new update.