So it is nice that you’ve implemented the METOTS logic into the sim. However, there are still some inaccuracies in the way it currently works.

The main issue is that the iniBuilds A380s METOTS logic appears to apply a thrust limitation without taking the target N1 into account. On the real aircraft, this limitation should only apply when the target N1 exceeds 78%.

In all other cases, the engines should spool directly to the commanded takeoff thrust, without being held at an intermediate N1 value before reaching the target.

For example, in the current iniBuilds A380, if the target N1 is 73% during take-off, the engines remain at approximately 68% until reaching 35 knots, before spooling up to the target thrust. This does not appear to reflect the correct METOTS logic.

I’ll attach a couple of photos and videos of the real aircraft for comparison.

SIM:

During takeoff, Stuck on 70.5 N1 Until 35kts, and then spolled to 72%. (Incorrect Logic)

IRL, Non METOTS takeoff: https://youtu.be/pHui34_ODnc?si=Lr03VQaoLh9DwGfn&t=13

IRL, Correct logic of METOTS Takeoff: https://youtu.be/7pX9hxn-cmE?si=xrmIlb2I1sst3Otm&t=770

Hi,

Thank you for the very detailed report! I have logged this for the team to review.

We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

Thanks again!

Departed today from WSSS to EGLLwith a TOW of 531 tons.

for runway 20C, the calculated takeoff performance was only around 78-79% during the takeoff roll. Which seems quite unlikely and unrealistic considering the aircraft almost hit was very close to its MTOW.

I also noticed an issue with the speed calculations. During takeoff, Vr speed being reached very late down the runway, if had rotated another 100-150 meters later, the aircraft would have run off the runway and ended up in the grass.

I think there is issue with the takeoff performance calculations and with the engines themselves.

I’ll attach a video of the takeoff later this day.

11 hours ago, ManuelLL said:

Departed today from WSSS to EGLLwith a TOW of 531 tons.

for runway 20C, the calculated takeoff performance was only around 78-79% during the takeoff roll. Which seems quite unlikely and unrealistic considering the aircraft almost hit was very close to its MTOW.

I also noticed an issue with the speed calculations. During takeoff, Vr speed being reached very late down the runway, if had rotated another 100-150 meters later, the aircraft would have run off the runway and ended up in the grass.

I think there is issue with the takeoff performance calculations and with the engines themselves.

I’ll attach a video of the takeoff later this day.

Edited Sunday at 03:57 PM5 days by ManuelLL

Just so you know, the METOTS issue still hasnt been fixed since the last updaete (1.0.3), even though mentioned that it is.

Disregard - MSFS didnt update the aircraft to the latest version, it has been fixed. sorry for the inconvenience.

Edited 7 hours ago7 hr by ManuelLL

Welcome to Inibuilds patches....!!!

Edited yesterday at 06:08 PM1 day by tturbo180

6 hours ago, ManuelLL said:

Just so you know, the METOTS issue still hasnt been fixed since the last updaete (1.0.3), even though mentioned that it is.

Who knows where they are getting data from. Fenix told us that most of the stuff is scripted and doesnt take into account RW variables. In other words, we have some fakery going on....

MY A380 is in the hangar for now. Honesty, im not real keen on buying anymore product form ini...Its good plane, just not good enough.

Cheers!

Edited 22 hours ago22 hr by Peter

@iniKyle can this be fowarded (again) to the dev team?

Disregard - MSFS didnt update the aircraft to the latest version, it has been fixed. sorry for the inconvenience.

Edited 7 hours ago7 hr by ManuelLL

thanks for the help :)

@iniKyle