Feedback for inibuilds, potentially ways to improve if possible that is (and the flight model as a simmer)

[limbo]

This is an interesting topic for literally nearly all simmers who don't touch the airliners because well we're to young or to old or just didn't do flying, but I would like to know if there have been any changes to flight model for a350 as I still find myself feeling a pitch up jerk as soon as raising the gear which is off putting and finding it a bit hard to control on the roll axis on final. I will add also the aircraft touches down as soon as 5 gets called out this was not present in initial versions.

To also add does Ini at all source digital flight data recorder data from real world flights, I think this would actually aid in helping create flight models alongside verification by real world pilots as Fenix has done this as well which they have set the example many times, it's not all the time a company has to go their own way!

Just want inibuilds to improve (flight model and system depth) and with how many years that a380 has been in development the community has high expectations, will it be a redemption, not sure but I'm on edge.

The company has a lot of potential with stunning visual models and on the surface systems A-B but given you guys are the first to many aircraft and being ace in system depth would certainty help with justifying the price you charge for aircraft but in the current state of system depth in the 350 and 340 I expect way more, the Xbox simmers deserve a taste to! (Not that I am one)

That is all from me, I know this is going to face critique but these are my honest thoughts of ini and how they can improve, pricing data sourcing ecetera, again to clarify I have 0 clue about aircraft development (I know it's hard) or how an aircraft feels but I am skeptical with ini.
Thanks for reading.