I found my FO....

[liketofly1]

Dear Inibuilds team,

Thanks for the 1.0.4 update - its a huge stability improvement. I'm currently on my second fligh, and up to now did not encounter a crash!

However, while attending the toilet, I found my FO sitting in the galley, and was wondering why?

[frank54]

I have the same problem.  the FO isnt in the correct position

[Swisspilot1986]

thank to her boobs she can float above the seat, however. 

[Karkass]

INI has plenty of problems as it is, apparently they don't have time for the pilot and co-pilot. I also like it when there is someone else in the cockpit. In my opinion, INI has one common folder for displaying pilots "Function_Interior_A350_Pilot" (the main parameters for 350-900), so in 350-1000 (and it is longer) - he sits in the kitchen. Let them solve this problem in the future. I tried to set it up manually, but there is a lot of fuss and risks. So for now I only fly 350-900, and even then the co-pilot does not always load correctly. We are waiting for updates.

[Max]

1 hour ago, Karkass said:

apparently they don't have time for the pilot and co-pilot

This is very much untrue.

It is a bug between the variant presets and the modular simObjects system in FS2024 sometimes reading/not reading the right data which we are working on ironing out, and the result is very unpredictable as of now as the position is different between loads. Just because it doesn't pop up as resolved in the next hotfix, does not mean we are not dedicated to continuously exploring and working towards a resolution to the issue, both internally and logging the issue with the developers of the simulator.

Rest assured that we are on it regardless.

Cheers.

[Karkass]

Thanks for the answer! I am an amateur, not a professional like your team. Now we understand that the work is going on, and everything is not so simple. The plane is the best for me today. We will wait for updates. I wish success to your team!

[Max]

2 minutes ago, Karkass said:

Thanks for the answer! I am an amateur, not a professional like your team. Now we understand that the work is going on, and everything is not so simple. The plane is the best for me today. We will wait for updates. I wish success to your team!

Appreciate your understanding, and thank you for the kind words and positive feedback - it means a lot to the team and I 😁

Wishing you many more successful flights in the A350.

Cheers.

[Karkass]

Max, I am for your team - the mountain. The product is unsurpassed. It's true. You are great. I know you are working hard to improve. Where I can, I explain why there is no co-pilot in the cockpit. Previously, there was a co-pilot in the 900, then you put him in the 1000. You can put him back in the 900. There are more liveries and flights. For now, temporarily. If it agrees with your technical requirements.

By the way, there will probably be fewer complaints.

Edited May 15 by Karkass

[Swisspilot1986]

there is now an addon on flightsim.to to put the FO at the right place

[SUB750T]

does not work!

[SUB750T]

On 5/3/2025 at 10:56 AM, tjockklat said:

Anybody else with the same issue? So the problem is when i chose a approach, it immediately starts lagging. Then when changing different approach it goes back to normal. So the Lag is directly connected to when choosing a approach. Maybe it starts calculating a lot of stuff and that gets stuck or something? I also had predicted -100.0 FOB at arrival when fuel was more than sufficient. Maybe its the fuel calculations that's making the lag. 

 

In the flight i decided to just vector myself to the ILS with the freq and course manually set in, was changing some stuff in the MCDU to maybe get the correct approach tuned in without it lagging like crazy but then i had a WASM crash, so I never got to Hong Kong 😄

 

This was in msfs 24 SU2 with v1.08. haven't tried going back to SU1 to see if the problem is with SU2.

 

On 4/2/2025 at 9:37 AM, Max said:

This is very much untrue.

It is a bug between the variant presets and the modular simObjects system in FS2024 sometimes reading/not reading the right data which we are working on ironing out, and the result is very unpredictable as of now as the position is different between loads. Just because it doesn't pop up as resolved in the next hotfix, does not mean we are not dedicated to continuously exploring and working towards a resolution to the issue, both internally and logging the issue with the developers of the simulator.

Rest assured that we are on it regardless.

Cheers.

Would separating A35X and A359 as totally separate Aircrafts (Folders) resolve this issue for you?