dalongpeter

Is it possible to reproduce this issue?

One more thing to add: I encounter this issue whether I use the GSX configuration file you provided or no configuration file at all, so it might not be related to GSX.

I have a rough guess: perhaps at other airports, the second jet bridge is used to connect to the aircraft door, whereas at OMAA, the first jet bridge is used instead. Due to the aircraft's dimensions, this results in an overlap—an issue that doesn't occur when I use the A380.

This is at Gate 637; I saw a screenshot of OMAA posted by someone on Discord, and it also showed overlapping jet bridges.

This issue does not occur at other airports because OMAA utilizes the first jet bridge, which does not align well with the A350's default use of the L2 door. Is it possible to specifically configure the A350 to use the L1 door for boarding at OMAA?

Hello! I would like to inquire about the progress of the OTHH update regarding multiple boarding gates. The A380 is set to be released next week; given that Qatar Airways is a major operator of the A380 and OTHH is its main hub, could you tell me roughly when we might see the OTHH update? Thank you!

Thank you so much for your reply! I have a feeling that the significantly upgraded A330as well as the future A380 and 350V2, will all be excellent products. Hats off to your team!!

I feel it should be updated along with the SU7; it seems only major updates include default aircraft upgrades.

First of all, thank you for your team's hard work. The A330 you've created is currently the highest quality. The only drawback is the lack of native EFB speed adjustment; it can only use the game speed setting, which causes a mismatch between fuel consumption and emulation speed. Has this been addressed in this major update? This issue has been raised extensively on the Microsoft forums, and we hope it can be addressed in an update.

Could you please tell us when version 1.2.7 of the 350 mentioned in the development update will be released?

I've tried 8x cruise in the Airbus aircraft you're building for 2024, and it was very stable during cruise, including the A330. The only drawback was the incorrect fuel consumption; if that could be improved, it would be perfect. 4x cruise is really outdated for a long-range wide-body aircraft. Admittedly, not every computer can handle that kind of pressure, but please add this option, because not all computers are incapable of doing so. This doesn't conflict with maintaining the existing 4x cruise. I really like the Airbus aircraft you're building, and I hope your team will seriously consider this suggestion, especially for the future A380 and A350V2!

I feel the same way as you. When using the A350, I try to choose flights under 8 hours. For some 12-15 hour flights, I choose the PMDG 777. When using the 777, I can fly at 8-16 times the speed very stably, which saves a lot of time.

I'd like to ask how the 350 8x speed is achieved? The EFB only supports up to 4x speed, and the built-in game speed options don't apply to 350

I have also encountered this problem. After my exploration, I found that it is a problem with the added lighting plugin. I had previously installed a plugin that turned the default lighting to white, which should be a compatibility issue. After I removed the plugin, all the lighting returned to normal and did not occur again. I am not sure if you also installed some third-party developer's lighting plugin. At least this is my current solution, so I am sharing it. If it is helpful to you, it would be best.

Yes, both the stability of the simulation rate and the fuel consumption performance are very good on 350 and 340-300, because their EFB has a built-in simulation rate option, which I guess is related to this. Another important issue is that the fuel consumption of all default Airbus aircraft cannot be adjusted according to the simulation rate. This problem was mentioned by many people a year ago, but it has not changed so far. Currently, only Airbus has this problem among all 2024 default aircraft. I hope to pay attention to this issue, because not every player has time to complete long-distance flights in real time. Currently, only a small amount of fuel can be added and unlimited fuel can be turned on to solve this problem, otherwise they will face overweight landing. Such an experience always has regrets. I even saw in the wish list on the MS forum that many players hope to launch the 330pro, and many people love this aircraft and are willing to pay upgrade fees for it, because many issues have been greatly improved and enhanced on the 340-300!