Hitachi

Is this feedback just being ignored? The odd-looking cockpit windows were already pointed out in promotional videos before the product was even released, so it’s clearly a mistake. In other words, I’m not the only one who noticed something was off. comment1 comment2 After reviewing the footage again, the size of the nose gear doors and the cabin windows also seems to be incorrect—but let’s just say that’s due to focal length differences and leave it at that, haha.

Is this issue included in the fix list? I recently went to the airport again and took more photos of the A350, and I still feel that there is something off about the cockpit windows on the iniBuilds A350. I've created a new comparison video. Even when accounting for differences in focal length, the black paint around the cockpit windows clearly appears too wide compared to the real aircraft. Please consider correcting this. MSFS.mp4

Even though TCAS is set to TA/RA, the TCAS standby warning is displayed. This is the same in both MSFS2020 and MSFS2024. I have one more question. The bank angle exceeds 30 degrees on its own. Is this a specification of the A350? Is it necessary to manually adjust the bank angle so that it does not exceed 30 degrees, as with the B737?

There are several sound-related issues that need to be addressed. When the nose is raised, the suspension rapidly extends and a thumping sound is heard — this sound should occur almost simultaneously with the nose-up movement. However, in the iniBuilds A350, the sound tends to play a few seconds after rotation. In some cases, it can be heard when the pitch angle reaches approximately 2.5°, so it might be that the logic is set to trigger the sound a certain number of seconds after the nose-up rather than based on pitch angle directly.

All the sound of the slats starting to move seems to have been cut off. This is the same when listening in the cockpit, which is unnatural because the slat sound is heard immediately after operating the flap levers. Attached at the end of the video is the slat sound I captured on the actual A350. Please correct me. 2025-05-10_13-48-41_1.mp4

When changing from flap 1 to flap 2, the slats do not seem to be moving when looking at the PFD, but I can hear the slats moving. This is due to the slat sound mixed with the flap sound. Is it possible to separate these sounds? 2025-05-10_13-48-41.mp4

Correction. The problem with the gear deployment and storage sounds being the same seems to be present in v1.0.10; we observed the same symptom in MSFS2024. Oddly enough, however, the next time I operated the gear, this problem did not occur. I am not sure under what conditions this occurs, but it appears that this problem remains. Why is sound so buggy? There are multiple other points I would like to point out besides this one...

The issue with gear unfolding and stowing sounds doesn't seem to occur in v1.0.10. All other issues are still present...

Gear stow sound and gear deployment sound are the same audio. The impact sound of the main gear landing is not played. Bump sound is played even though the nose gear has not landed. The impact sound of the nose gear landing is slightly delayed. 2025-05-10_13-55-03_2.mp4

When I superimposed it over the actual photo, the lines still seem too thick. Of course, there may be a margin of error since the photos were not taken from the same angle or at the same focal length, but the inibuilds A350's face seems to be far from the actual A350's atmosphere. Could you please review the modeling and textures around the face? maskB.mp4

2025-04-25_11-19-11.mp4 The sound when the button is pressed is misaligned. It is playing when the power is switched, not when the button is pressed. There are too many bugs in the sound... Is there still no fix for the bug that has been around since v1.0.0, where most of the sounds are not heard when the fixed camera in the showcase is placed inside the cabin?

It is correct that the sound of the flaps can be heard inside the cockpit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9Pb_3qN910

As you are probably already aware, the tire floating bug still remains. (v1.0.8) This photo shows the -900 and -1000 gears from the same perspective. The photo was taken with the lightest and heaviest conditions. I have investigated the cause of the change in tire position depending on the weight, and it seems that the calculation of “static compression” and “max compression ratio” in flight_model.cfg - [CONTACT POINTS] is often not correct. I am not an expert, so I would like to ask another manufacturer's expert to improve this problem as soon as possible. （As for the 1000, the tires are not floating, but their position has changed due to weight.）

I adjusted the FCU to increase speed. After a few seconds, it suddenly specified 0kt and began to slow down. It occurred just after takeoff, when I was trying to increase speed in the meantime because the climb stopped due to altitude restrictions.

Thank you for adding the 90-60 sound in the recent update. I have added the new 70,60 and always feel uncomfortable when landing as it is obviously different from the actual A350 sound. The Retard sounds seem to be a bit different as well. I have lined up all the sounds in the video. Obviously the 90,80,70,60 and Retard sounds seem to be different. The rest of the sounds seem to be perfect. Please fix this in an update. GPWS.mp4