Jump to content

aseinsha

Member
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

aseinsha's Achievements

8

Reputation

  1. Man i swear I remember reading it but then I totally forgot and even re-installed the plane trying to troubleshoot and I'm glad I checked the forums before going in deeper lool aight MEL!
  2. aseinsha

    IDENT

    Hello, How can I IDENT? I can't seem to find a way and there is no button for it on the squawk box.
  3. Hi gimbyger! Thanks for your reply, yes that is a good workaround, thanks for the suggestion! Hopefully though the controls can be fully separated in future maybe? 😅 Do appreciate the work around though, didn't come to my mind! thanks, I'm sure it will be of great help!
  4. Hello, When I use my rudders which is bound to RUDDER AXIS the tiller is also moving, this is proving problematic when taking off/landing with high crosswind. Is there a way to separate the controllers? I've realized that the tiller can operate separately from the rudder (using NOSE WHEEL STEERING AXIS) but the opposite doesn't seem to be true? If there isn't a way to do this right now can you please add it to the list? Thanks 🙂
  5. aseinsha

    ZFWCG

    Thank you sir 😄
  6. aseinsha

    ZFWCG

    Hello, I just wanted to ask if anyone knows a way to get ZFWCG information? The only way I have been able to get an accurate ZFWCG is to set fuel to Zero in EFB and apply changes with passenger and cargo loaded to get the CG (which in this case since its calculated with 0 fuel would be same as ZFWCG) Was wondering if there is a better way, thanks!
  7. You're correct in that it has to do with broken MSFS ice model but OP's issue is not related to engine anti-ice its the Pitot tube heat that can't handle the issue which in return gives bad airspeed data. So OP, if this ever happens and you have the pitot tube heat on then you can disable anti ice effect in MSFS assistance settings to recover from this issue. (keep in mind though a310 is pretty old and if the conditions are severe enough the real Pitot tube would probably also fail.)
  8. Yeah...missing TERR, failures, not sure how this is superior to x-plane version as being advertised but hey, its free I'm not complaining its just that it would great if they could be added. I would even pay 20 Euros or something for an enhanced realistic version.
  9. Hi Cammac! thanks for the reply! The pressurization looks to work now, not sure why it wasn't working before, thanks for the note regarding the APU door! 😃
  10. Hello I was wondering if the add-on has manual gear extension? I searched around the cockpit for it although I found the RAT release handle I didn't see anything regarding manual gear extension. I also looked through the manual and didn't see anything but I believe this was included in the X-plane version so just wondering if its something I'm missing or not, thanks 🙂
  11. Its free for end users but you're making it sound like iniBuilds just gave this out for free, that is very incorrect and misleading, Microsoft paid for it to juice up MSFS. If Laminar Research pays them it'll be "free" on X-Plane too, but that's very unlikely to happen.
  12. aseinsha

    Speedbrakes

    what if you look at the wings, can you confirm they're not extended visually?
  13. There is no arrow on top right corner of FMC showing you can go from Init to Init B via next page. The APU flap door doesn't look to be simulated. Pressurnization doesn't look to be simulated. (opening outflow valves at 30'000ft does nothing) I will buy a cargo version!! 😄
  14. Just FYI you can download a lot of liveries already through iniManager.
  15. Was looking for this as well thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...