Jump to content

sunake

Member
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sunake

  1. Hi. I don't know what kind of policy you guys have on releasing updates, if you plan on releasing them weekly or what, but I completely understand not working on the weekend. However in the future maybe you guys can consider releasing updates on a Wednesday or Thursday instead of Fridays. That way if the update breaks anything (like it has broken the plane now) you can release a quick emergency hot fix before the weekend. I dunno though. 

    Anyway I greatly appreciate the work you guys have done and I'm looking forward to seeing this product improve as more things get added and can't wait to see what you have planned next. 

    • Thanks 1
  2. 6 hours ago, Hitachi said:

    switch viewpoints to make sure it is set properly.

    Switch viewpoints? You can tell the parking brake is on or off by looking at the PFD though. 

  3. Yes, what 559AS said. When Singapore did that route with the A340-600, I believe they used an all business class configuration so the passenger load was much less than a standard configuration A346. I was able to plan that route successfully in simbrief by dropping the passenger load down to 100ish. Also it's possible Singapore Airlines also has an exception or something, to use different enroute reserve fuel planning, which allows them to legally take less reserves for the enroute portion. 

  4. Which variant, the 900 or 1000? I did one 9 hour flight with the 900 so far using the simbrief profile without any adjustment and I was using less fuel than planned. By the time I was at top of descent I was up by almost 5000lbs. Did you enter the step climbs and winds into the FMS? 

  5. 1 hour ago, ApocalypsePlease0 said:

    If it's realistic, then what's the point of managed speed? I doubt it.

    Okay found it. You can see the indicated airspeed kinda hanging out below target at 44:36 and 45:21. Again it might still be a bug for the inibuilds, or maybe an unintentional realistic behaviour. The real thing does very slowly adjust pitch to catch back up to the target but it's not perfect 

     

     

  6. 1 hour ago, ApocalypsePlease0 said:

    If it's realistic, then what's the point of managed speed? I doubt it.

    Probably is a bug, but remember the real things aren't perfectly flawless either. They experience weirdness every now and then, even the brand new stuff. If I can find that video where they were climbing and the IAS was 5ish knots below the target speed on YouTube again I will send it to you if you don't mind 

  7. I successfully entered a 2 mile offset while on a NAT track. I set the offset to start at DINIM and end at waypoint 4750N which was drawn correctly on the ND but when the plane reached 4750N, it started to make a 180 degree turn. 

  8. Yeah the touchdown sounds could be improved. At the moment I have no idea I've landed unless I see the ground spoilers extend on the flight control page. So some nice feedback would be cool. 

×
×
  • Create New...