Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

RJTT LDA22Y:

MX22 is the hardcoded MAP of that approach. Now the systems displays several items wrong.

1. There is no RWY-Waypoint coded in the NAVDATABASE for that approach, because the MAP is prior the Runway. So DON'T display a RWY-Waypoint in the F-PLN !!

2. The blue track line has to start at MX22, because that's the MAP ! So the INTCPT Heading of 208° has to be drawn blue from MX22, resulting in a different INCTP position with the CF leg (178°) to UTIBO.

3. If the GA is not displayed, then there is just blank between MX22 and RWY. NO green line.

4. The WPT-name "INTCPT" has to be drawn green (also the diamond) on ND.

5. That is not related to LDA, but to all non Precission Approches with the MAP prior Rwy. 

6. In the expected is the FIX INFO REF (green RJTT22 ) included, that is currently also not drawn (reported in other topic).

7. In the expexted is also a proper ALTN departure setting included (RJTT22 as departure), currently not possibel in iniAirbus, also reported.

 image.png.43cf9b30e42f0118d88ea7512ff7bafd.png

 

 

 

image.png

 

EXPECTED picture:

image.png

 

 

Edited by Der Michel

Specs:
CPU-14900K, RAM-64GB-6800, GPU-4090

Posted

@Eddie this issue is also relevant for the A350 and all other Airbus ini has done so far.

The last two pictures of my post clearly indicates the still long way ini has to go with its FMS.

Specs:
CPU-14900K, RAM-64GB-6800, GPU-4090

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...