Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 6 months later...
Posted

Yes, both the stability of the simulation rate and the fuel consumption performance are very good on 350 and 340-300, because their EFB has a built-in simulation rate option, which I guess is related to this. Another important issue is that the fuel consumption of all default Airbus aircraft cannot be adjusted according to the simulation rate. This problem was mentioned by many people a year ago, but it has not changed so far. Currently, only Airbus has this problem among all 2024 default aircraft. I hope to pay attention to this issue, because not every player has time to complete long-distance flights in real time. Currently, only a small amount of fuel can be added and unlimited fuel can be turned on to solve this problem, otherwise they will face overweight landing. Such an experience always has regrets. I even saw in the wish list on the MS forum that many players hope to launch the 330pro, and many people love this aircraft and are willing to pay upgrade fees for it, because many issues have been greatly improved and enhanced on the 340-300!
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...