Jump to content

foliainfx

Member
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

foliainfx's Achievements

2

Reputation

  1. Did they really overlook the fact that RNP-AR approaches can't be flown with FLS..?
  2. Does it work with the normal 2024 version? Try clearing your wasm folder.
  3. And maybe ini shouldn't be so resistant to advice and facts. My personal opinion but I am sure many will agree. I wonder what their customers think about working less on updates.
  4. Actually, you are right, I thought you meant the line on the VD indicating the vertical path. Apologies for the misunderstanding
  5. Step descents aren't implemented currently, iirc they wanted to implement this at a later point
  6. It's dashed when the FCU altitude is different from the CRZ ALT entered, this should also be fixed in the next update already
  7. In the next update there should already be a few things fixed (RADIO HEIGHT, constraints). VIEW ALONG ACFT TRK will be implemented at a later point is what I got told previously
  8. So your issue is that when you manually tune the frequency, the values get reset?
  9. Send an image of your RMP
  10. Ini know about this issue, it should be fixed in the large update
  11. It's not unlikely they're just straight up ignoring you to prevent you from getting a refund (since the product doesn't work) actually. Wait for a response, if they don't answer within a week ask about it. They've been ignoring my ban appeal for a while now.
  12. Try doing a full deinstall, with all files deleted and then reinstalling.
  13. The first load after an update/install will be WASM compiling, this will take quite a lot of time compared to other loads. While this compiles you can switch to other tabs just fine. The time varies, it's 10-15 minutes roughly on average.
  14. I agree with what you've said. Still my primary focus is that their reference pilots agree with the incorrect model. If those pilots are flying the same spot irl they would in the sim, they are a safety hazard to flight crew and passengers. Their seating position would be too high throwing their flight path angle perception off and can cause issues operating the rudder aswell as instruments. I have attached an image which is according to Airbus a too high seating position. This gets really close to the false position (according to them and their pilots right) in the iniBuilds. I hope iniBuilds will take necessary measures as this is a hazard that should not be happening, especially under several pilots.
  15. The A350 only has 4 autobrake types: - BRK MED - BTV - BTV CONTAM - RTO (MAX in other aircraft)
×
×
  • Create New...