Jump to content

Foxx744

Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Foxx744

  1. To be honest the tunnel entrance could have had a photo representation of the real thing as a temporary placeholder. Some designers have achieved quite a good representation of tunnel entrances. That aside what is more off-putting is the bridge/road elevation across the existing basic 2020 scenery, there is no proper integration what-so-ever which in effect has failed your quality checks 3 times. It saddens me that you say "we might revisit this area in a future patch" when a more positive "we will" would have been more encouraging. If this stays "as good as it gets" then says a lot about your attention to detail or lack thereof. Hoping for a positive outcome - regards.
  2. After 14 days, I was hoping for a response to this observation. This "poor quality" representation appears to have slipped through 3 major updates to EGLL. Is it possible to have an update on when this will be resolved or given that others have viewed but not commented; am I doing something wrong?
  3. Asobo Heathrow removed with inibulds Heathrow Airport installed. Whilst not an absolute game changer, I was disappointed with the area surrounding the main entrance to Heathrow. Roads appear elevated over the original scenery as do some bridges. The car park next to the main bridge is a squashed photo of cars as are any cars seen on the road next to the runway. The smaller bridge to the right of the main bridge is both elevated and going no where. The actual tunnel entrance itself is a poor visualisation of what it should be. I spoke to another Flt Simmer in another forum who posted screenshots exactly the same as mine. Given that this is one of the most famous airports in the world, I would have expected far better detail. Is this as good as it gets or am I doing something wrong?
×
×
  • Create New...