Fab10

Yes, I understand that, and now we all know even if it wasn’t hard to guess. In my opinion, rain effects should be offered as standard in all high end products, including your A300 & A310 products. I always felt that you were better than choosing to not say anything, but I was wrong, hence my disappointment. It seems as if customers wanting rain effects in their IS A300/A310 aircraft will have to wait until XP12, which will arrive at cost for platform as well as potential product upgrade costs. Some users may choose to not upgrade to XP12, so they’ll be stuck without rain effects in a high end product. Honestly, I expected more from you, perhaps even implementing rain effects of your own design, like other developers.

Honestly, I cannot think of a single good reason for secrecy, it is nothing but nonsensical smoke-screening. Even if you’d prefer to wait for XP12 rain effects, you should say so. First and foremost, your audience consists of customers as well as potential customers, please don’t forget that. The sums of money we have exchanged for licences to use your products are not insignificant, thus our investment in you is not marginal and not to be marginalised.