Wondering if the A300 is accurately modelling the climb and cruise AOA. Climbing to FL320 and at roughly 28,000’. The ADI is reading 0 degrees level but the aircraft is climbing at 825’ PM. Looking at the exterior view of the aircraft clearly looks like it’s flying level or a tad nose down In the climb
Also cruises at 0 degrees at TOC on the ADI.
I did find out that Airbus did design their ACF to cruise quite a bit more level than Boeing ACF. But this seems a bit much no?
Still an awesome payware aircraft.
And use of VHF com 2 would be nice too.
Cheers!
AOA. relevant to normal climb and cruise
in General Discussion
Posted
Wondering if the A300 is accurately modelling the climb and cruise AOA. Climbing to FL320 and at roughly 28,000’. The ADI is reading 0 degrees level but the aircraft is climbing at 825’ PM. Looking at the exterior view of the aircraft clearly looks like it’s flying level or a tad nose down In the climb
Also cruises at 0 degrees at TOC on the ADI.
I did find out that Airbus did design their ACF to cruise quite a bit more level than Boeing ACF. But this seems a bit much no?
Still an awesome payware aircraft.
And use of VHF com 2 would be nice too.
Cheers!