2 hours ago2 hr I would like to report a suspected high-angle-of-attack protection issue with the iniBuilds A350 in MSFS 2024.During a high-altitude deceleration test, the aircraft continues to maintain approximately 25° nose-up pitch after I release the sidestick. A.FLOOR activates, but there is no apparent protective nose-down response as the airspeed continues to decrease into the red low-speed band on the PFD.Steps to reproduceFly at a high altitude, for example FL360.Apply aft sidestick to raise the pitch attitude to approximately 25° nose-up.Release the sidestick to neutral and make no further pitch inputs.Observe the aircraft as its airspeed decreases.A.FLOOR activates, but the aircraft continues to maintain approximately 25° nose-up pitch.Airspeed decreases further into the red low-speed band, with no apparent pitch reduction to limit angle of attack.Expected behaviourWith Normal Law and high-AoA protection available, the flight controls should intervene to limit angle of attack. With the sidestick released, I would expect the aircraft to reduce pitch as necessary to control AoA, rather than continue holding the previous high pitch attitude throughout the deceleration.Comparison with the default iniBuilds A330When I perform a similar test in the default iniBuilds A330 in MSFS 2024, the aircraft lowers its nose and the protection appears to work. I do not observe the same sustained high-pitch behaviour.Test informationSimulator: MSFS 2024. Example starting altitude: FL360. Pitch attitude before releasing the sidestick: approximately 25° nose-up.Reference and requestAirbus describes high-AoA protection in Normal Law as commanding a nose-down pitch rate when the alpha-protection threshold is exceeded: Airbus Safety First: Control your speed... in cruise.Could you investigate whether the A350's high-AoA protection is engaging correctly and whether its pitch-control response is working as intended in this scenario? Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by AAABBB
Create an account or sign in to comment