Physical printer support (POS ... 80) // Remote KCCU / OIS

[ClaasKrause]

Hi dear iniBuilds team,

 

first of all: huge props for the SU4 performance improvements on the A350.

The gains in smoothness and stability are very noticeable, especially on longer sectors and in complex scenery. It’s clear a lot of deep, unglamorous work went into that, and it really shows.

 

Now that performance has taken such a solid step forward, I’d like to suggest two features that would meaningfully push immersion and workflow realism to the next level, especially for users with more advanced setups.

 

---

 

 

1) 

Physical Printer Support (POS 80 / similar)

 

 

Support for a physical cockpit printer (e.g. POS 80–style thermal printers) would be a fantastic addition.

 

Use cases:

 

• ATIS printouts

• OFP / loadsheet

• Weather and route revisions

• Clearances or operational notes

 

Several aircraft already show how powerful this can be for immersion, and the A350—with its strong procedural focus—would benefit enormously from it.

 

---

 

 

2) 

Remote KCCU / OIS (Tablet / Browser / Networked Device)

 

 

A remote KCCU / OIS interface, similar in concept to what Fenix or FSLabs offer, would be a major quality-of-life improvement.

 

Potential benefits:

 

• Entering FMGS data from a tablet via a browser

• Interacting with the OIS (charts, performance, documents) outside the main sim view

• Cleaner workflows for users without perfect mouse access to the cockpit

 

 

Given the A350’s real-world architecture (KCCU + CDS + OIS), a remote implementation feels both technically appropriate and highly immersive.

 

---

 

 

Why now?

 

 

With SU4, the aircraft feels like it has reached a performance baseline where deeper interaction features become viable without compromising stability. These two additions would not just be “nice extras,” but meaningful steps toward a more complete, modern long-haul simulation environment.

 

Thanks again for the work you’ve done so far — the A350 is already an impressive piece of engineering. I hope you’ll consider these ideas for a future update.

 

Best regards, thanks, Claas

[ClaasKrause]

would be too cool ...

[IniSteve]

Hi. I'll take these suggestions and feed them back to the team.
 
For what it's worth, with mobiflight or spad, you can setup about 90% of the KCCU functions that are exposed in the sim (I do this for my WW MCDU) but I agree a native solution would improve things overall. We'll see if anything can be done. Thanks! 

[ClaasKrause]

ah interesting ... are such mobiflight profiles to be found on flightsim.to? recently I had the problem that mobiflight won´t recognize my winctrl hardware so I had to count on simapp pro itself ...

 

THANK YOU! Looking forward what the team says 🙂